SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boeser to New York

Créé par: AFox23
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 27 sept. 2021
Publié: 27 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Canucks use Boeser to get cap space and Hamonic replacement
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
89 000 000 $
56 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Schneider, Braden
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
2.
VAN
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (3 500 000 $ retained)
STL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 197 326 $648 780 $3 800 000 $10 302 674 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
250 000 $250 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
886 667 $886 667 $
AD
RFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 sept. 2021 à 23 h 52
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Hey, the league doesn’t exist to benefit the rangers.
28 sept. 2021 à 0 h 5
#2
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,478
Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
The 7M retention would cost a 1st by itself.
28 sept. 2021 à 0 h 45
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,771
Mentions "j'aime": 1,386
VAN decline.
28 sept. 2021 à 2 h 16
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,361
Mentions "j'aime": 593
Add Kakko and Van might consider that trade
28 sept. 2021 à 2 h 33
#5
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,862
Mentions "j'aime": 1,423
We need BS & 1st more than an expensive winger
28 sept. 2021 à 3 h 1
#6
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Van should have traded Boeser last season and resigned Toffoli. But Van fans went crazy at the thought of trading Boeser, so the GM let Toffoli walk as a UFA.
28 sept. 2021 à 3 h 24
#7
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Hey, the league doesn’t exist to benefit the rangers.


Hey, the Rangers are not trading for Boeser when they just traded Buchnevich to avoid resigning him to 5.8. If Buchnevich is worth Blais and a 2nd, why would the Rangers trade more for Boeser? The league doesn’t exist to benefit the Rangers... Thank you Captain Obvious, but you’re comment doesn’t apply to this trade.
28 sept. 2021 à 8 h 27
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: AJC13
Hey, the Rangers are not trading for Boeser when they just traded Buchnevich to avoid resigning him to 5.8. If Buchnevich is worth Blais and a 2nd, why would the Rangers trade more for Boeser? The league doesn’t exist to benefit the Rangers... Thank you Captain Obvious, but you’re comment doesn’t apply to this trade.


So this was just right over your head, huh.
29 sept. 2021 à 8 h 51
#9
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
So this was just right over your head, huh.


Not at all over my head, but rather your comment is completely devoid of logic. I consider Buchnevich and Boeser as just about equal in trade value. But the above trade proposal has the Rangers giving up much more in trade than they received for Buchnevich.

So, why would you make the comment “The league doesn’t exist to benefit the Rangers.”? Do you understand that your comment is not applicable and makes absolutely no sense or was this just right over your head?
29 sept. 2021 à 8 h 54
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: AJC13
Not at all over my head, but rather your comment is completely devoid of logic. I consider Buchnevich and Boeser as just about equal in trade value. But the above trade proposal has the Rangers giving up much more in trade than they received for Buchnevich.

So, why would you make the comment “The league doesn’t exist to benefit the Rangers.”? Do you understand that your comment is not applicable and makes absolutely no sense or was this just right over your head?


Okay, so, this was over your head. I’ll explain why. Obviously…obviously this trade heavily favors the rangers. This particular poster went on a bit of a spree where he posted three of four threads with with the rangers getting phenomenal bounties for next to nothing. He had a thread just prior to this trading basically a first rounder for mcavoy.
29 sept. 2021 à 9 h 23
#11
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Modifié 29 sept. 2021 à 9 h 35
see below
29 sept. 2021 à 9 h 34
#12
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Okay, so, this was over your head. I’ll explain why. Obviously…obviously this trade heavily favors the rangers. This particular poster went on a bit of a spree where he posted three of four threads with with the rangers getting phenomenal bounties for next to nothing. He had a thread just prior to this trading basically a first rounder for mcavoy.



Thank you for explaining. Regardless of his other trade proposals, this trade is very tilted towards VAN - not NYR. Boeser’s market value right now is a player similar to Blais and a 2nd round pick. Unless you’re insinuating that the Vancouver’s GM is so much better that the Rangers GM, that he would be able to finagle more in trade out of the market value than Drury.
29 sept. 2021 à 9 h 47
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: AJC13
Thank you for explaining. Regardless of his other trade proposals, this trade is very tilted towards VAN - not NYR. Boeser’s market value right now is a player similar to Blais and a 2nd round pick. Unless you’re insinuating that the Vancouver’s GM is so much better that the Rangers GM, that he would be able to finagle more in trade out of the market value than Drury.


Boeser is worth more than you think. Blais has never had more than 20 points, and has never had more than eight goals. Boeser has three 20+ goal seasons, and has averaged an 82 game pace of 31 goals and 68 points. Oh, and he’s younger than blais.
29 sept. 2021 à 9 h 50
#14
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Okay, so, this was over your head. I’ll explain why. Obviously…obviously this trade heavily favors the rangers. This particular poster went on a bit of a spree where he posted three of four threads with with the rangers getting phenomenal bounties for next to nothing. He had a thread just prior to this trading basically a first rounder for mcavoy.


Looked up the McAvoy trade proposal... I hate trades that involve Strome... Strome has been just about a point per game player the last two seasons playing on a line with Panarin. The season prior to the last two, he was on pace (with NYR) for just about a 45 point season playing on the 3rd line - without Panarin.

But for some reason Strome is considered by most hockey fans, not rooting for the Rangers, to be over rated. Which leads to every trade proposal he’s listed in becoming a debate. Which is hysterical because obviously if he played for any Canadian team, the trade proposals being presented would be Strome for McAvoy straight up.
29 sept. 2021 à 9 h 56
#15
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Modifié 29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 2
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Boeser is worth more than you think. Blais has never had more than 20 points, and has never had more than eight goals. Boeser has three 20+ goal seasons, and has averaged an 82 game pace of 31 goals and 68 points. Oh, and he’s younger than blais.


I believe the Rangers value Blais much more than his point totals. So Van would instead get a player who produced more points, but didn’t bring the physical type element Blais brings. Though Blais might have the talent to evolve into the point producer he once was before the NHL.

But Boeser’s market value is just about Buchnevich’s value.
29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 14
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: AJC13
I believe the Rangers value Blais much more than his point totals. So Van would instead get a player who produced more points, but didn’t bring the physical type element Blais brings. Though Blais might have the talent to evolve into the point producer he once was before the NHL.

But Boeser’s market value is just about Buchnevich’s value.


Boeser has a pretty well rounded game. He’s worth more than Buchnevich, and a country mile more than blais. I can’t honestly believe anyone would value blais close to boeser.
29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 15
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: AJC13
Looked up the McAvoy trade proposal... I hate trades that involve Strome... Strome has been just about a point per game player the last two seasons playing on a line with Panarin. The season prior to the last two, he was on pace (with NYR) for just about a 45 point season playing on the 3rd line - without Panarin.

But for some reason Strome is considered by most hockey fans, not rooting for the Rangers, to be over rated. Which leads to every trade proposal he’s listed in becoming a debate. Which is hysterical because obviously if he played for any Canadian team, the trade proposals being presented would be Strome for McAvoy straight up.

Would you trade strome for fox straight up? That’s the equivalent. I now think you don’t know who boeser or mcavoy is.
29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 23
#18
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Boeser has a pretty well rounded game. He’s worth more than Buchnevich, and a country mile more than blais. I can’t honestly believe anyone would value blais close to boeser.


We have a failure to communicate... Boeser’s trade value is equal to Buchnevich. Buchnevich is just as well rounded as Boeser if not better well rounded. Is Boeser on Vancouver’ number one penalty killing unit, like Buchnevich? Expect Boeser’s trade return to be on par with Buchnevich... Which was Blais and a 2nd round pick.
29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 25
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: AJC13
We have a failure to communicate... Boeser’s trade value is equal to Buchnevich. Buchnevich is just as well rounded as Boeser if not better well rounded. Is Boeser on Vancouver’ number one penalty killing unit, like Buchnevich? Expect Boeser’s trade return to be on par with Buchnevich... Which was Blais and a 2nd round pick.


Buchnevich hasn’t provided the offense over the course of his career that Boeser has. Boeser is also two years younger. The rangers also made a really bad trade. That doesn’t impact Boeser’s value.
29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 31
#20
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Would you trade strome for fox straight up? That’s the equivalent. I now think you don’t know who boeser or mcavoy is.


Hello! Hello! Hello! I’m not a fan of a Canadian team!

I now think you have a very low attention span and you’re just not capable of reading everything I’m writing. Just a sentence or two of it. Your comments have nothing to do with the conversation at hand. Please force yourself to reread what I wrote and see how your comments are completely devoid of logic.
29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 37
#21
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Buchnevich hasn’t provided the offense over the course of his career that Boeser has. Boeser is also two years younger. The rangers also made a really bad trade. That doesn’t impact Boeser’s value.


Regardless of the past, Buchnevich is now a better point producer and a more well rounded player. Thus he’s a better player. The Rangers received market value for Buchnevich. If Van gets more for Boeser, it won’t be much more. If you believe differently, get ready for disappointment.
29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 39
#22
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: AJC13
Regardless of the past, Buchnevich is now a better point producer and a more well rounded player. Thus he’s a better player. The Rangers received market value for Buchnevich. If Van gets more for Boeser, it won’t be much more. If you believe differently, get ready for disappointment.


I’m not a Canucks fan. I don’t care. The Canucks have no reason to move him. I think you’re being a bit of a rangers fanboy here.
29 sept. 2021 à 10 h 58
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: AJC13
What is it with you Bruin fan boys getting drunk all the time? Please, in the future sober up first before making comments.


Just for the record, you’re the one being a contrarian here. I don’t think you’ll find anyone outside of New York that thinks Boeser is worth Blais and a 2nd.
29 sept. 2021 à 11 h 14
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,538
Mentions "j'aime": 6,693
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Just for the record, you’re the one being a contrarian here. I don’t think you’ll find anyone outside of New York that thinks Boeser is worth Blais and a 2nd.


I agree. Id give way more than Blais and a 2nd for Boeser and I think many many would agree. With that said, Buchnevich was also undersold solely due to cap considerations. If Covid never existed, Buch would have got more in trade too. IMO.
CMcAvoy73 a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2021 à 12 h 9
#25
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Bb
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage