SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just an old idea I hadnt seen in a while

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 24 sept. 2021
Publié: 24 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This proposed trade is after Malkin gets sent to LTIR.

From the Hawks perspective. I'm beating a drum here, but Strome isn't a winger. It's incredibly frustrating to see Stan insist that Strome can play wing. Yes, it's SUPPOSED to be easier to transition from center to wing than going from wing to center, BUT Jesus Marian Hossa...let the kid be who he is! It's only been 1 day of training camp, but if Borgstrom is anything close to as advertised...then we have 6-8 NHL centers right now. Even if we Load Manage Toews...we'll have enough centers

From the PIT perspective. I'm a Hawks fan and Stan is messing up Strome big time. Is Strome going to be a defensive stalwart...no, but he's got great vision, great passer and let's face it...PIT is set up to be a run and gun type offense. The run part can be handled by KK, but Strome will help the gun part for sure. His metrics are actually a lot better than people give him credit for......WHEN HE PLAYS CENTER...STAN!!! CHI isn't getting any of your best prospects and in all sincerity, you can still flip his RFA rights after the season if you want. Heck, you might get a better return that (2) 2nds if you actually play him at center.
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $63 141 672 $452 439 $3 382 500 $18 358 328 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 sept. 2021 à 11 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 92
Mentions "j'aime": 9
I like strome alot, but Hextall said no 1sts and 2nds getting traded unless its a big player. Id work with Strome for Bjorkqvist and a 2nd, not two.
Imagine875948 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 11 h 37
#2
Pens are the best
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 5,390
Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
Pens decline because of cap. Hextall also said his 2nd and 1st round picks aren't for trade unless it's a big player. I'd do a Pettersson and Strome swap, but idk if it works for CHI
24 sept. 2021 à 11 h 58
#3
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Quoting: Imagine875948
Pens decline because of cap. Hextall also said his 2nd and 1st round picks aren't for trade unless it's a big player. I'd do a Pettersson and Strome swap, but idk if it works for CHI


Hawks aren't really interested in a player coming back. More so picks. Does 6'3" 200+ lbs count as a big player??? awesome face

But why cap? Malkin will be LTIR for "at least" 2 months Per Sexy Hexy
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,735
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
Call me nuts, but Edmonton maybe a better fit.

Something along the lines for Strome for Kassian and a pick...... gives Edmonton a legit 3C and the Hawks get real sandpaper on the third line......🤷‍♂️
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 10
#5
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Quoting: swinny
Call me nuts, but Edmonton maybe a better fit.

Something along the lines for Strome for Kassian and a pick...... gives Edmonton a legit 3C and the Hawks get real sandpaper on the third line......🤷‍♂️


Hawks won't touch Kassian even if he can't with a 2nd and no Strome. Hawks really can't take any long term cap dumps.
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 25
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,735
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
Quoting: exo2769
Hawks won't touch Kassian even if he can't with a 2nd and no Strome. Hawks really can't take any long term cap dumps.


Not sure I call it a cap dump if the contracts are nearly similar, and long term Strome likely sees more money.

The real idea is to move Strome (and the contract) to address an area of need. Maybe that isn't the 3rd line (I like Hagel and Nylander there frankly), but I don't think moving him just for picks is the right direction either.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 30
#7
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Quoting: swinny
Not sure I call it a cap dump if the contracts are nearly similar, and long term Strome likely sees more money.

The real idea is to move Strome (and the contract) to address an area of need. Maybe that isn't the 3rd line (I like Hagel and Nylander there frankly), but I don't think moving him just for picks is the right direction either.


That's fair. I can't discourage another opinion. My Opinion is that the Hawks roster is packed right now. It was designed that way for competition purposes, but the enitre point of this post was that the Hawks are NOT utilizing players are their best positions. So, then why even have them?
24 sept. 2021 à 12 h 34
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,735
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
Quoting: exo2769
That's fair. I can't discourage another opinion. My Opinion is that the Hawks roster is packed right now. It was designed that way for competition purposes, but the enitre point of this post was that the Hawks are NOT utilizing players are their best positions. So, then why even have them?


Quoting: exo2769
That's fair. I can't discourage another opinion. My Opinion is that the Hawks roster is packed right now. It was designed that way for competition purposes, but the enitre point of this post was that the Hawks are NOT utilizing players are their best positions. So, then why even have them?


Can't disagree there. We have seen this so many times. Depth is great, but when it begins to erode the real potential of players, it is a detriment.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage