SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Van Should Do

Créé par: Eclipze
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 18 sept. 2021
Publié: 24 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 250 000 $
811 000 000 $
Transactions
VAN
  1. Boqvist, Jesper
  2. Mercer, Dawson
  3. Smith, Ty
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 823 992 $648 780 $3 800 000 $5 676 008 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 sept. 2021 à 0 h 33
#1
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,925
Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
What the Devils shouldn't do
Eclipze, UBS_ARENA et Tintin a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 0 h 35
#2
BigTramFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 395
Mentions "j'aime": 86
VAN should literally do the opposite of this! Are you a Devils fan?
24 sept. 2021 à 0 h 40
#3
Démarrer sujet
EclipzeEDM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 992
Mentions "j'aime": 225
Quoting: Devil1122
What the Devils shouldn't do


I wouldn’t if I was NJ either but to get the Hughes trifecta they might be dumb enough to.
UBS_ARENA a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 0 h 42
#4
Démarrer sujet
EclipzeEDM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 992
Mentions "j'aime": 225
Quoting: BigTramFan
VAN should literally do the opposite of this! Are you a Devils fan?


If NJ were to offer this package Vancouver would be dumb to say no.
GenXHockey, UBS_ARENA, Tintin and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 0 h 48
#5
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,925
Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
Quoting: Eclipze
I wouldn’t if I was NJ either but to get the Hughes trifecta they might be dumb enough to.


Their GM isn't dumb enough to do this
24 sept. 2021 à 0 h 48
#6
BigTramFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 395
Mentions "j'aime": 86
Quoting: Eclipze
If NJ were to offer this package Vancouver would be dumb to say no.


I disagree. Q Hughes is elite (by the way Jack Hughes isn't elite). Smith may end up being a top 4 Dman. Mercer and Boqvist are totally unproven. You don't trade your potential SUPER star for lesser players. End of story.

Also Pettersson has not earned an $11m contract yet.
zackhendo a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 0 h 51
#7
Démarrer sujet
EclipzeEDM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 992
Mentions "j'aime": 225
Quoting: BigTramFan
I disagree. Q Hughes is elite (by the way Jack Hughes isn't elite). Smith may end up being a top 4 Dman. Mercer and Boqvist are totally unproven. You don't trade your potential SUPER star for lesser players. End of story.

Also Pettersson has not earned an $11m contract yet.


Offensively yes but defensively he’s terrible.
UBS_ARENA et Devil a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 1 h 0
#8
BigTramFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 395
Mentions "j'aime": 86
Quoting: Eclipze
Offensively yes but defensively he’s terrible.


His defense was terrible last season, as was the entire team defense under Baumgartner. Prior to that, esp in the bubble playoffs of 2020, he showed he can defend well. I wouldn't put too much stock in last season's defense, which is another reason why I wouldn't be selling low on QH
24 sept. 2021 à 1 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 795
Quoting: BigTramFan
I disagree. Q Hughes is elite (by the way Jack Hughes isn't elite). Smith may end up being a top 4 Dman. Mercer and Boqvist are totally unproven. You don't trade your potential SUPER star for lesser players. End of story.

Also Pettersson has not earned an $11m contract yet.


Lmao. Smith as a rookie is already a top 4 dman. As for hughes he is top 3 in worst defenseman defensively. Him, barrie and deangelo. He isnt and will never be a number 1 dman. Because hes such a liability defensively. Jerseys 1st will probably be top 10 simply bc of how tough the metro and east as a whole are. Mercer is unproven yet looks great and boqvist looks like he will be a solid 2 way 3rd liner. Theres no way im doing this if im NJD.
Devil a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 4 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,590
Mentions "j'aime": 18,152
Take out Mercer and the pick, and that is the realistic return ...should Vancouver ever be forced into moving Quinn.
Eclipze et Devil a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 9 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,646
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: Devil1122
What the Devils shouldn't do


Beat me to it. 👍🏻
Eclipze et Devil a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2021 à 9 h 7
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,646
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: BigTramFan
I disagree. Q Hughes is elite (by the way Jack Hughes isn't elite). Smith may end up being a top 4 Dman. Mercer and Boqvist are totally unproven. You don't trade your potential SUPER star for lesser players. End of story.

Also Pettersson has not earned an $11m contract yet.



Hughes is terrible defensively
24 sept. 2021 à 9 h 12
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,691
Mentions "j'aime": 1,932
That's funny right there!
Eclipze a aimé ceci.
27 sept. 2021 à 1 h 24
#14
VanFan12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 321
Mentions "j'aime": 97
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
Lmao. Smith as a rookie is already a top 4 dman. As for hughes he is top 3 in worst defenseman defensively. Him, barrie and deangelo. He isnt and will never be a number 1 dman. Because hes such a liability defensively. Jerseys 1st will probably be top 10 simply bc of how tough the metro and east as a whole are. Mercer is unproven yet looks great and boqvist looks like he will be a solid 2 way 3rd liner. Theres no way im doing this if im NJD.


'He will never be a number 1'. He is the Canucks number one dman, right now. He would be New Jersey's number on dman, right now (you could probably argue Dougie is better, and I'm sure you would).

Ty Smith played by far the most sheltered minutes for NJ last year and was still a negative player. QH also almost doubled him in points.
4 oct. 2021 à 4 h 17
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 795
Quoting: zackhendo
'He will never be a number 1'. He is the Canucks number one dman, right now. He would be New Jersey's number on dman, right now (you could probably argue Dougie is better, and I'm sure you would).

Ty Smith played by far the most sheltered minutes for NJ last year and was still a negative player. QH also almost doubled him in points.


Wtf???? "He would be new jerseys number one dman right now"?? No, no just please no. Tell me that you have some inkling of who is better than who. "You could probably argue that dougie is better" no i cant. Bc in order to argue that id need to have someone with the other opinion and i dont think anyone is dumb enough to say that quinn hughes is better than dougie hamilton. I also know that you dont really know how to evaluate hockey players. I know your eye test is all screwed up thanks to your comments about dougie (who btw is a fringe top 5 dman certainly top 10 whereas quinn isnt close to that) and i know you dont know how to use stats/analytics either bc you are using points to determine how good a player is, let alone the fact that its a defenseman.
Also just bc hes the best defenseman on the 2nd worst defense in the league (per jfresh hockey) doesnt make him a number 1 dman. Leon draisaitl isnt a 2C even though hes the 2nd best C on his team.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage