SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

hertl READ EXPLANATION

Créé par: Dekes
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 21 sept. 2021
Publié: 21 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hertl has made it clear he is displeased with sharks and their actions to handle kane's situations, he also announced that he is in no rush to decide on a contract extension now if im a sharks fans this would worry me and before you compare it to bergy's situation they are completely different. Boston is all in and i guarantee you if bruins win the cup he will retire but if they don't he comes back for another push he's also 36, in hertl's situation hes only 28, san jose has been on massive decline and with couture, burns, karlson and valsic's large and close to un-movable cap hits the odds they could build a winning roster around him are close to impossible. So san jose do you think a player whos heading into his prime and is about to become a ufa will resign to a team that is gonna be a bottom 6 team for the next few years i think NO. so explain to me why you believe you could pry a team of their best prospect, a top young forwards and a first round pick that makes literally no sense when a team can take their chances of signing him in ufa. Now here is where sharks fan will say well we are in control and we won't take an offer that's worth less then his full value. Well unfortunately you don't have control at this rate it will be almost guaranteed by TDL Hertl won't be returning so the odds of you getting the best package for him will be very low. Now to the trade Debusk, beecher a 1st more and 3rd is almsot equivalent to the value of 3 1sts, idc what people think but debrusk is still a skilled young forward one bad season does not define a players a career, but it comparison to other forwards eichel for ex. his trade value is that of 4 first round quality players and picks, but the thing with eichel is buffalo has control, eichel is signed long term he's also younger and has yet to reach his full potential, with hertl you already know what you are getting. The chances of san jose bringing in a package even nearly close to eichels value is laughable
Transactions
SJS
  1. Beecher, John [Liste de réserve]
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Moore, John
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 829 841 $1 956 507 $182 500 $1 670 159 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 5,062
Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
Has there been a Boston trade that hasn't started DeBrusk, Moore...???
lilfimpen, yikes, Lenny7 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 25
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
I stopped reading the description when you guaranteed a bergeron retirement if they win the cup. Everyone else should stop there too.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 26
#3
Snipe City
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 68
DeBrusk is ham juice.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 29
#4
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
Tldr. Not the right pieces for Hertl and terrible value for SJS. Hard pass
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
San Jose declines.

Trade Debrusk and Moore together somewhere for a pair mid level prospects to free up cap space. Then trade for Hertl or JT Miller or whoever.

SJ has little interest in Debrusk and there is not enough return for them without that interest.
Klara a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 32
#6
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Look at the Sharks winger depth and see that Debrusk is the last thing needed. Trades must help both parties not 1 party.

Debrusk - not needed, value reduces because of that regardless
moore - cap dump, not large tho
beecher - low end prospect with no big upside
late first
3rd

not the right package regardless of value.

Teams like MIN, COL, OTT can offer 100x better packages fitting team needs for SJS and themselves.

Boston isn't in position of moving quality youth assets because of how bare bones they are. They can't afford a trade. They should wait till UFA if Hertl is a rental or go after other targets and keep their assest while also trading Debrusk if needed for more youth assets.
FunMustBeAlways et Bruinadian67 a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 37
#7
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,935
Mentions "j'aime": 914
Sharks want a quality prospect and a 1st I thought. How is that an Eichel trade?
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 38
#8
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: goodfella
Sharks want a quality prospect and a 1st I thought. How is that an Eichel trade?


because Debrusk is worth 2 firsts.
goodfella a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 38
#9
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Riley816
Has there been a Boston trade that hasn't started DeBrusk, Moore...???


Yeah, they're giving me the "Engvall/Dermott/Mikheyev" vibes right now.

Quoting: CMcAvoy73
I stopped reading the description when you guaranteed a bergeron retirement if they win the cup. Everyone else should stop there too.


I read until the end because I was curious as to how the trainwreck would end....The Debrusk+Beecher+1st is essentially equivalent to 3 1sts for SJ part really gave me a good chuckle too though.
yikes a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 46
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Lenny7
Yeah, they're giving me the "Engvall/Dermott/Mikheyev" vibes right now.



I read until the end because I was curious as to how the trainwreck would end....The Debrusk+Beecher+1st is essentially equivalent to 3 1sts for SJ part really gave me a good chuckle too though.


Hertl being worth three firsts is just as funny
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 51
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: yikes
Look at the Sharks winger depth and see that Debrusk is the last thing needed. Trades must help both parties not 1 party.

Debrusk - not needed, value reduces because of that regardless
moore - cap dump, not large tho
beecher - low end prospect with no big upside
late first
3rd

not the right package regardless of value.

Teams like MIN, COL, OTT can offer 100x better packages fitting team needs for SJS and themselves.

Boston isn't in position of moving quality youth assets because of how bare bones they are. They can't afford a trade. They should wait till UFA if Hertl is a rental or go after other targets and keep their assest while also trading Debrusk if needed for more youth assets.


San Jose wing depth is not very good honestly, and that is with Kane and who knows how that plays out.

SJ declines but it’s not because of that.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 56
#12
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Hertl being worth three firsts is just as funny


I don't disagree with that at all. With no extension, a 1st+a top prospect would be a reasonable ask, IMO. 3 team trade list will potentially put a damper on it as well...
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 57
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Lenny7
I don't disagree with that at all. With no extension, a 1st+a top prospect would be a reasonable ask, IMO. 3 team trade list will potentially put a damper on it as well...


First and a third is the going rate
21 sept. 2021 à 13 h 7
#14
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: Gofnut999
San Jose wing depth is not very good honestly, and that is with Kane and who knows how that plays out.

SJ declines but it’s not because of that.


Umm:

Meier - Vying for Kanes role if he leaves, talented player struggling, better to play than debrusk
Kane - top 6 high end player, but.. yknow, and hes playing anyways more likely than not
Leonard - shows alot of potential and was very good two way last year, younger and better to play than debrusk

Labanc - actually has been playing well, no need to punish him if hes been good
Bara - played really really good in his small showing, deserves to play top 6 as a result with Hertl until he loses it
3RW - open but Chmelevski and a few other prospect deserve the shot
Balcers (3RW) - play here, played well in his showing and deserves the shot

then we have:

Dahlen, Nieto, Chmelevski as I said, followed by later prospects next year; Bordeleau (tranistion to wing but could be a C), Eklund

The only guy that I would play Debrusk over is in the bottom 6/ 3rd line and thats the RW but Meier, Kane, Leonard should have LW and Debrusk isnt a 4LW. On RW (idk if he can play RW well or has) we could see him take 3RW but if Chmelevski or a guy like Dahlen earns it out of camp its better to let those younger unproven kids play there and Balcers is still around who plays well everywhere but would be best in the bottom 6.

So really its only Balcers, Chemelevski, Dahlen, Nieto (im not even counting Cogs because I dont want him to see ice time lol) who I would play Debrusk over and theyre all bottom 6 which is fine if he can play 3RW or be there if we need a 3LW for unknown reasons yet. Otherwise hes playing 4th line which isnt where Debrusk should play soooo. Only if Kane moves than Debrusk would have a role. Otherwise.. yes the Sharks are too full of wingers to have any use for Debrusk.
21 sept. 2021 à 13 h 13
#15
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
First and a third is the going rate


Dvorak got 1st and a 2nd and is worse (but good i like him and he had term), Hertl with an ext. is worth more and as a rental as Lenny said he would likely return a 1st/ spec. So basically Dvoraks return minimum/ swap the second for a prospect if hes a rental so nope its not that.
21 sept. 2021 à 13 h 27
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,025
Mentions "j'aime": 3,569
Quoting: yikes
Dvorak got 1st and a 2nd and is worse (but good i like him and he had term), Hertl with an ext. is worth more and as a rental as Lenny said he would likely return a 1st/ spec. So basically Dvoraks return minimum/ swap the second for a prospect if hes a rental so nope its not that.


Dvorak hasn’t hit 40 points in his career, Hertl has done it multiple times. If the last two seasons were not cut short, he was on pace for 65 points those seasons and has had a season over 70 points. Hertl can play 1C, Dvorak caps out at 2C. I say he’s worth more than Dvorak even as a “rental” as every likes to come back to in order to justify a bad offer.
yikes et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 13 h 28
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: yikes
Dvorak got 1st and a 2nd and is worse (but good i like him and he had term), Hertl with an ext. is worth more and as a rental as Lenny said he would likely return a 1st/ spec. So basically Dvoraks return minimum/ swap the second for a prospect if hes a rental so nope its not that.


He’s a rental. With an extension is barely worth a thought
21 sept. 2021 à 13 h 34
#18
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
He’s a rental. With an extension is barely worth a thought


Alright troll have a good day smile
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 13 h 42
#19
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,057
Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
Quoting: glarson17
Dvorak hasn’t hit 40 points in his career, Hertl has done it multiple times. If the last two seasons were not cut short, he was on pace for 65 points those seasons and has had a season over 70 points. Hertl can play 1C, Dvorak caps out at 2C. I say he’s worth more than Dvorak even as a “rental” as every likes to come back to in order to justify a bad offer.


Just tryna be fair and see both sides, I’m confident there will be a good outcome for whatever happens
glarson17 et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 13 h 59
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: yikes
Alright troll have a good day smile


Listing a fact is trolling?
21 sept. 2021 à 14 h 17
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Modifié 21 sept. 2021 à 15 h 57
Quoting: yikes
Umm:

Meier - Vying for Kanes role if he leaves, talented player struggling, better to play than debrusk
Kane - top 6 high end player, but.. yknow, and hes playing anyways more likely than not
Leonard - shows alot of potential and was very good two way last year, younger and better to play than debrusk

Labanc - actually has been playing well, no need to punish him if hes been good
Bara - played really really good in his small showing, deserves to play top 6 as a result with Hertl until he loses it
3RW - open but Chmelevski and a few other prospect deserve the shot
Balcers (3RW) - play here, played well in his showing and deserves the shot

then we have:

Dahlen, Nieto, Chmelevski as I said, followed by later prospects next year; Bordeleau (tranistion to wing but could be a C), Eklund

The only guy that I would play Debrusk over is in the bottom 6/ 3rd line and thats the RW but Meier, Kane, Leonard should have LW and Debrusk isnt a 4LW. On RW (idk if he can play RW well or has) we could see him take 3RW but if Chmelevski or a guy like Dahlen earns it out of camp its better to let those younger unproven kids play there and Balcers is still around who plays well everywhere but would be best in the bottom 6.

So really its only Balcers, Chemelevski, Dahlen, Nieto (im not even counting Cogs because I dont want him to see ice time lol) who I would play Debrusk over and theyre all bottom 6 which is fine if he can play 3RW or be there if we need a 3LW for unknown reasons yet. Otherwise hes playing 4th line which isnt where Debrusk should play soooo. Only if Kane moves than Debrusk would have a role. Otherwise.. yes the Sharks are too full of wingers to have any use for Debrusk.



Ya that’s not that good. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Meier is better suited for 2nd line playing a first line role.

Labanc is better suited for 3rd line playing a top 6 role.

After that you have bottom 6ers. Roster fillers and spare parts til the better prospects who are years away emerge.

Debrusk has been more productive and has higher ceiling than Labanc. You put Debrusk on that team today and he’s 3rd or 4th best wing. You may not like him or want him. Can’t see past last year. That’s fine. But that is reality.

He does not fit in a rebuild mode for SJ. Which is why I dont see much interest. 1st and Beecher is fine but the 3rd piece should be another prospect not a salaried player not far away from his UFA years. And Moore had no business being in a trade for Hertl when the value isnt there to begin with.
21 sept. 2021 à 15 h 0
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
I don’t know if I’ve seen a Boston trade where it’s not just Hertl for a bunch of garbage you don’t want. And I did read the entire description.

Easy decline.
yikes et Bias_it_self a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 15 h 1
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: yikes
Alright troll have a good day smile


Dude is living in a fantasy world pay no mind to him
yikes et Bias_it_self a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 16 h 2
#24
Démarrer sujet
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,025
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
I stopped reading the description when you guaranteed a bergeron retirement if they win the cup. Everyone else should stop there too.



Explains to me why he wouldn’t retire? If bruins win the cup that’s it chances are they won’t see it again for a while. Why wouldn’t he end his career on a high note of being a champion? Also you think Hertl is worth a 1st and a 3rd I think what I’m willing to offer is much more valuable as debrusk and Beecher are in the trade as well
21 sept. 2021 à 16 h 5
#25
Démarrer sujet
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,025
Quoting: glarson17
Dvorak hasn’t hit 40 points in his career, Hertl has done it multiple times. If the last two seasons were not cut short, he was on pace for 65 points those seasons and has had a season over 70 points. Hertl can play 1C, Dvorak caps out at 2C. I say he’s worth more than Dvorak even as a “rental” as every likes to come back to in order to justify a bad offer.


That’s the thing though Dvorak has term, Hertl doesn’t and Hertl has showed no signs of wanting to resign in San Jose with train wreck that’s going on there. The roster is bad it doesn’t have this stacked prospect core better then Boston’s for sure but that ain’t much considering we’ve been a dominant team for 10+ seasons. There is nothing to look forward to in San Jose until karlson, burns, vlasic and coutures contracts are off the book
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage