SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

For The Love of God We Need a Rebuild

Créé par: FlexSportsNet
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 21 sept. 2021
Publié: 21 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Niederreiter, Nino
  2. Quapp, Nikita [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
CAR
  1. Karlsson, Erik
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. McNabb, Brayden
  2. Primeau, Mason
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Kane, Evander
  2. Kniazev, Artemi
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2781 500 000 $67 030 264 $0 $425 000 $14 469 736 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
825 000 $825 000 $
C
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
889 166 $889 166 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 822 764 $2 822 764 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 sept. 2021 à 2 h 0
#1
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
ah yes presume cap space doesnt exist here right?
21 sept. 2021 à 2 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 86
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Vegas runs away with that trade and doesn't look back.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 2 h 7
#3
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Don Waddell has no idea how to manage a cap situation so unfortunately the Karlsson trade results in Carolina trading Necas for a 2nd rounder ☹
21 sept. 2021 à 2 h 8
#4
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Not sure I see why either team does the 3rd trade

Can you elaborate

SJ should hit cap floor by weaponizing cap like AZ
21 sept. 2021 à 2 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,131
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Kniazev isn’t being traded. These moves are not good for a rebuild at all
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 2 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Not sure how trading our best LD prospect and a 1st is a good idea if we’re rebuilding
21 sept. 2021 à 2 h 27
#7
MajorMoose
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 3,425
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
So the team who wouldn't offer Hamilton more than 6.2 would trade for a worse player making 11.5
21 sept. 2021 à 9 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 520
Mentions "j'aime": 373
Sending a gambling addicted to Vagas, what can go wrong with that?
palhal et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 9 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,884
Mentions "j'aime": 6,389
Ah yes, Kane in Vegas what could go wrong
gretzkyghosts et RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 9 h 13
#10
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,639
Mentions "j'aime": 9,748
I've been saying for 2 years now that SJS should rebuild. It was always a bad choice to get EK. He's the same player and position as Burns. Never made sense from the jump. IF SJS really wants to rebuild...and actually do it right, vs half a$$ing it. You just trade one piece EK and retain 50%. Dead serious about that too. If MIN can find a way to eat $14M...SJS can find a way to eat $5.75M. You don't think TOR would give practically their entire prospect pool for the puck moving RD for a steady contract of $5.75M for EK? Amirov, Robertson, Topi, the 2022 1st...SJS would still have their lottery pick too!
21 sept. 2021 à 9 h 21
#11
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
We need a rebuild so let's trade one of our best prospects and a likely very high 1st in a super deep draft. What a start.
Bias_it_self et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 9 h 36
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
We need a rebuild first trade moving own first round pick. If rebuilding why trade your most valuable rebuilding asset? That contract is less harmful if committed to a rebuild it’s harmful if trying to build a competitive team around it.
Bias_it_self a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 10 h 13
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,489
Mentions "j'aime": 22,664
Teams certainly can't/won't be involved in trades where they receive so much back in cap in trades. Right now, despite his play, Kane is not tradable. And EK is no where worth his contract.
21 sept. 2021 à 10 h 43
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,350
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: Radu47
Not sure I see why either team does the 3rd trade...
The Sharks kill that trade.
Middleton, and Meloche are career AHL players.
Only Ristolainen had a higher TOI/GM than Bryson, he will not be traded unless it is a good return.
Adams wanted Bjork when he traded Hall, it is unlikely he will be traded for two AHL players.
He will most likely play #3 LW behind Skinner and Olofsson and on the #1 PK unit.
I have no idea how Karmanos managed to squeeze a fifth out of NJD with Butcher.
Last year he had 11 pts in 23 games, for his career he averages over .35pts/gm
This year he is penciled in to be the Sabres #2 LHD.
I can see why the Sharks make this trade, they get THREE NHL players for 2 AHL players and a fifth.
Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2021 à 12 h 51
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 500
Mentions "j'aime": 101
kane in vegas, fookit if it works it works lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage