SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ricochetii Challenge

Créé par: ZPirtle
Équipe: 2021-22 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 20 sept. 2021
Publié: 20 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Created by @Ricochetii

Select one player from each team.

When finished:
You must be within $1M of the cap.
You may have no more than 2 forwards on ELC's.
You may have no more than 2 defense on ELC's.
You must have a full 23 man roster including scratches.
Move the remainder of your selections to LTIR (not on final roster).
Set lines and defense pairings.

This is intended to be done in one sweep. Start with any team and make selections alphabetically by team. If there are players you have in mind for later, you may want to pick lesser players from earlier teams.
Mistakes are okay, but don't redo your selections. You'll set your roster from the players you selected and sacrificing some of your picks while making final choices is part of the exercise.
(Think of it like having a 32 player training camp and making final cuts. As you can see, I made a number of selections I had to cut and send to LTIR to be compliant).
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 377 053 $0 $850 000 $2 122 947 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 838 362 $1 838 362 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
716 667 $716 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
858 333 $858 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 sept. 2021 à 12 h 43
#1
Go Preds
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 682
Mentions "j'aime": 229
20 sept. 2021 à 13 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 7,089
Very solid team.

Goaltending is probably the weakest position just because they both only really have one season under their belts -- even if they were goodseasons. Would be nice if you could've snuck Petersen in there over Vanecek (not that I dislike him).
20 sept. 2021 à 17 h 45
#3
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
I figured people would go for MacKinnon, probably one of the best values in the league right now.
Chychrun should be another popular choice. Even if he's on the 2nd pairing, the dollar value is good.
Bonino is probably an underrated choice. Would have been my preferred 3C if I didn't go with Hertl.

It's interesting to see what people can come up with when options are more limited. This challenge probably isn't restrictive enough, but too many limitations and all the teams look sameish.

Did you find the final cuts difficult after seeing who you were left with? (I picked too many RD so it was a tough call for the final spots.)

Another aspect is where people choose to make budget cuts. You elected not to pick up any "high priced" skaters and probably made your D a little deeper with cheaper options in goal. Risky, but part of the fun.

Nice job overall!
21 sept. 2021 à 9 h 55
#4
Démarrer sujet
Go Preds
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 682
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: ricochetii
I figured people would go for MacKinnon, probably one of the best values in the league right now.
Chychrun should be another popular choice. Even if he's on the 2nd pairing, the dollar value is good.
Bonino is probably an underrated choice. Would have been my preferred 3C if I didn't go with Hertl.

It's interesting to see what people can come up with when options are more limited. This challenge probably isn't restrictive enough, but too many limitations and all the teams look sameish.

Did you find the final cuts difficult after seeing who you were left with? (I picked too many RD so it was a tough call for the final spots.)

Another aspect is where people choose to make budget cuts. You elected not to pick up any "high priced" skaters and probably made your D a little deeper with cheaper options in goal. Risky, but part of the fun.

Nice job overall!


Yeah, I had some of the same problems when I got to the end. I wanted to build a mostly two-way top 9 and strong defense. Goalies may be young/unproven, but that group in front should help out. Hardest part at the end was making Pulock work. I originally had Hakanpaa, but that seemed silly, so I moved stuff around.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage