The Panthers would do that all day long IMO, but not the Canucks

hmmm i think they might maybe add a second or woo instead of a first tho?

And why would the Canucks give you two firsts in this deal?

cause myers is terrible retention and a really good contract for a top 4 RD but honestly i would take one out for like a second or woo maybe as imo he hasnt shown much

… Myers is staying and the Canucks aren’t trading two firsts to lose him. Canucks also don’t need Kessel. Look at their top 9, where does Kessel fit in the wing?

This deal is a moot point anyway though regardless of value. Myers won't waive for Arizona

Exactly! Also why would Myers waive anyhow?

Fixed Yay

good

By the way I have a question, is the "Do I look nervous" under your username a reference to Jordan "Losington"?

yea i felt like that Luongo in that picture would kill me lmao

Winnington* you mean?

Nashville gave up a first for gaustad, you should trade em a 4th liner for o e too

Perhaps

LOL

I abide by the title that Loui gave him

Florida is a no-state-income-tax jurisdiction and Arizona isn't, so this would require Bobrowsky to waive his NMC in order to go from a Stanley Cup contender to a bottom-3 team AND take a significant pay cut.

AZ is im pretty sure so i was thinking he waives gets the same amount of money and gets to be the starter

The Arizona state income tax rate for all incomes over $250,000 per year, which obviously applies to all NHL players, is 8%. Arizona also has a high sales tax rate, almost as much as California's (which is the highest in the US).

Thus Bobrowsky would pay $960,000 in state income tax this year and next.

huh my bad