SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

next year

Créé par: Bobbyt32
Équipe: 2022-23 Islanders de New York
Date de création initiale: 16 sept. 2021
Publié: 16 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
3950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 000 000 $
75 750 000 $
44 500 000 $
55 250 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NYI
Logo de COL
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
2023
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $80 689 963 $245 796 $537 500 $810 037 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 2
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $ (250 000 $$250K250 000 $$250K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 sept. 2021 à 14 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 270
Pulock will get more than that. Ekholm too, probably.
UBS_ARENA et palhal a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 14 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 795
I know youre basing that pulock extension on pelechs deal but pulock is a better player, and hes a UFA. Its gonna be imo something like 7×7-7.5.
16 sept. 2021 à 14 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 15,017
Mentions "j'aime": 12,091
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
I know youre basing that pulock extension on pelechs deal but pulock is a better player, and hes a UFA. Its gonna be imo something like 7×7-7.5.


Pelech was better than Pulock last season, but points factor into how much a D gets paid and Pulock has scored 10 goals multiple times in his career which is why he’ll get paid more.
16 sept. 2021 à 14 h 49
#4
Daws is underrated
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 1,915
Mentions "j'aime": 636
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
I know youre basing that pulock extension on pelechs deal but pulock is a better player, and hes a UFA. Its gonna be imo something like 7×7-7.5.


yeah I would say 7x7
16 sept. 2021 à 14 h 56
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 15,017
Mentions "j'aime": 12,091
Quoting: islandersfan14
yeah I would say 7x7


8* years
islandersfan14 a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 15 h 10
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 795
Quoting: Db1899
Pelech was better than Pulock last season, but points factor into how much a D gets paid and Pulock has scored 10 goals multiple times in his career which is why he’ll get paid more.


Yes, pelech had a career year and pulock had a terrible year. Also where do you see pelech "was better"? What are you using to determine that?
16 sept. 2021 à 15 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 795
Quoting: Db1899
8* years


Id rather 7 tbh
16 sept. 2021 à 15 h 13
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 15,017
Mentions "j'aime": 12,091
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
Yes, pelech had a career year and pulock had a terrible year. Also where do you see pelech "was better"? What are you using to determine that?


Pulock wasn’t bad, his underlying numbers were good he just had a career low S%

Every analytics platform had pelech as a top 10 defenseman overall last season. Elite at driving offense as well as being the 2nd best defensively.

16 sept. 2021 à 16 h 4
#9
Daws is underrated
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 1,915
Mentions "j'aime": 636
Quoting: Db1899
8* years


yeah probably
16 sept. 2021 à 16 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 795
Quoting: Db1899
Pulock wasn’t bad, his underlying numbers were good he just had a career low S%

Every analytics platform had pelech as a top 10 defenseman overall last season. Elite at driving offense as well as being the 2nd best defensively.



Im not saying pelech wasnt great, my question is what metric or model are you using that says he was better than pulock?
As for pulock having a bad season, his entire offensive game was gone. The 3 seasons before last (which was basically his whole career. He played 15 games in 15-16 and 1 in 16-17) he scored at a .5ppg rate consistently. Last year he had a .3ppg. Over those 3 season roughly 1/3 of his points were goals, this season it was roughly 1/9.
16 sept. 2021 à 16 h 38
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 15,017
Mentions "j'aime": 12,091
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
Im not saying pelech wasnt great, my question is what metric or model are you using that says he was better than pulock?
As for pulock having a bad season, his entire offensive game was gone. The 3 seasons before last (which was basically his whole career. He played 15 games in 15-16 and 1 in 16-17) he scored at a .5ppg rate consistently. Last year he had a .3ppg. Over those 3 season roughly 1/3 of his points were goals, this season it was roughly 1/9.


Pelech had a higher GF/60, xGF/60, CF/60 (all offensive metrics) than Pulock. Evolving Hockey, micahs isolated impact. And Jfresh all had pelech as the stronger defenseman. Pulock was still above average in all those metrics, but Pelech was elite.

Pulocks offensive game wasn’t gone. In fact Pulock was better at driving offense this season than the previous 3 seasons at even strength. He only had 2 goals but he should have had 6 or 7 based on the quality scoring chances he was getting. That’s just bad luck. Pulock’s production took a hit because of that and the fact that and because no one could finish the chances he created on the powerplay. Next season he’ll be back to a .5 ppg pace


UBS_ARENA a aimé ceci.
18 sept. 2021 à 7 h 36
#12
NY Isles Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 253
Mentions "j'aime": 9
I think there is no reason to bring back Clutterbuck at this point, unless its a 1 year deal
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage