SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Small Improvements

Créé par: Rankers
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 sept. 2021
Publié: 16 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Edmundson, Joel
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
3.
NJD
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
4.
TOR
  1. Patrick, Nolan [Droits de RFA]
VGK
  1. Mikheyev, Ilya
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de TBL
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $77 838 117 $0 $0 $3 661 883 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,629
Mentions "j'aime": 7,363
the leafs wouldnt trade a cardboard cut out of morgan rielly for that
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 26
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,479
Mentions "j'aime": 22,654
Don't know how having Edmundson over Reilly is an improvement.
Trading Kerfoot gives the Leafs absolutely no centre depth.
Gee, what's so special about Patrick over Mikheyev\?
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 30
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
I think that's the closest Rielly trade I've seen that's realistic in terms of value to this point. That said, I don't think MTL makes this trade simply because they're trading a cost-controlled solid dman for a rental. Now, you swap him out with Chiarot? I think you're closer. TOR would have a better chance financially of re-signing Chiarot.

The NJ trade just wouldn't work for NJ IMO....

NJ isn't moving Graves, not for that return. Graves is definitely a better dman than Dermott. Now, Kerfoot for Wood? Wood is definitely a fan favorite and gives NJ that grit element, but bringing in Kerfoot allows them to have a solid 3C and Zacha can stay at wing, so if you amended something around that? I could see potential.
Opie a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 34
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: palhal
Don't know how having Edmundson over Reilly is an improvement.
Trading Kerfoot gives the Leafs absolutely no centre depth.
Gee, what's so special about Patrick over Mikheyev\?


Patrick is probably a lateral move to replace Kerfoot. There's nothing really special about Patrick over Mikheyev aside from age and pedigree. I personally think Patrick tops out at a solid 3C, which isn't bad, but him being 22 and a former 2nd overall, I think the ceiling is higher for him at this point than Mikheyev.

Edumundson isn't an improvement over Rielly in terms of offense, but he is in terms of defense and he's cost-controlled at $3.5M for three seasons.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 38
#5
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Did not have to look any further than that first trade.
Oodz a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 41
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I think that's the closest Rielly trade I've seen that's realistic in terms of value to this point. That said, I don't think MTL makes this trade simply because they're trading a cost-controlled solid dman for a rental. Now, you swap him out with Chiarot? I think you're closer. TOR would have a better chance financially of re-signing Chiarot.

The NJ trade just wouldn't work for NJ IMO....

NJ isn't moving Graves, not for that return. Graves is definitely a better dman than Dermott. Now, Kerfoot for Wood? Wood is definitely a fan favorite and gives NJ that grit element, but bringing in Kerfoot allows them to have a solid 3C and Zacha can stay at wing, so if you amended something around that? I could see potential.


Did u not see see Jones and Risto got in return- as expiring deals. This deal isn’t even close to being Reilly’s trade value
Barilko14 a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 43
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,479
Mentions "j'aime": 22,654
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Patrick is probably a lateral move to replace Kerfoot. There's nothing really special about Patrick over Mikheyev aside from age and pedigree. I personally think Patrick tops out at a solid 3C, which isn't bad, but him being 22 and a former 2nd overall, I think the ceiling is higher for him at this point than Mikheyev.

Edumundson isn't an improvement over Rielly in terms of offense, but he is in terms of defense and he's cost-controlled at $3.5M for three seasons.


But the point of the post, was to make the Leafs better, and the Leafs are still in a win mode, so this makes them worse.
The Leafs don't know Edmundson long term as their LHD seems secure even without UFA Reilly in 22/23. Patrick certainly has more upside than UFA MIkeheyev, but the trade probably doesn't help the Leafs this year. Kerfoot is a dependable centre, which the Leafs lack in NHL depth. Kampf and his one goal last season is not 3C, and even Spezza did not play much at centre last season. le
I really don't understand any post from a positional point of view that trades Kerfoot and doesn't have a capable centre as a replacement.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 43
#8
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
"Why would team x ever consider that"

Is over used here but applies 100% to that Rielly deal

It doesn't even save much cap for Toronto 😑
Barilko14 et Oodz a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 43
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,287
Mentions "j'aime": 19,536
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I think that's the closest Rielly trade I've seen that's realistic in terms of value to this point. That said, I don't think MTL makes this trade simply because they're trading a cost-controlled solid dman for a rental. Now, you swap him out with Chiarot? I think you're closer. TOR would have a better chance financially of re-signing Chiarot.

The NJ trade just wouldn't work for NJ IMO....

NJ isn't moving Graves, not for that return. Graves is definitely a better dman than Dermott. Now, Kerfoot for Wood? Wood is definitely a fan favorite and gives NJ that grit element, but bringing in Kerfoot allows them to have a solid 3C and Zacha can stay at wing, so if you amended something around that? I could see potential.


Kerfoot is despised is Jersey, really bad nlood there. They will never trade for him
zyyyp, Devil, Tintin and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 52
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Quoting: Radu47
"Why would team x ever consider that"

Is over used here but applies 100% to that Rielly deal


It doesn't even save much cap for Toronto 😑


Lol I feel like players lose value If they play for the leafs,
On this site
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 54
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,075
Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
Wood >> Kerfoot
Graves >>>>> Dermott

the difference is a lot more than a 2nd and a late round pick
Devil et Tintin a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 55
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Kerfoot is despised is Jersey, really bad nlood there. They will never trade for him


I feel like we've heard those kind of things before regarding players and it didn't matter. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I personally don't put a ton of stock into stuff like that.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 57
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: palhal
But the point of the post, was to make the Leafs better, and the Leafs are still in a win mode, so this makes them worse.
The Leafs don't know Edmundson long term as their LHD seems secure even without UFA Reilly in 22/23. Patrick certainly has more upside than UFA MIkeheyev, but the trade probably doesn't help the Leafs this year. Kerfoot is a dependable centre, which the Leafs lack in NHL depth. Kampf and his one goal last season is not 3C, and even Spezza did not play much at centre last season. le
I really don't understand any post from a positional point of view that trades Kerfoot and doesn't have a capable centre as a replacement.


Patrick would/could be that suitable replacement with more upside. Look, I'm not saying I agree with the trades for either side, but I can see the reasoning behind them.
16 sept. 2021 à 9 h 59
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Oodz
Did u not see see Jones and Risto got in return- as expiring deals. This deal isn’t even close to being Reilly’s trade value


Very different situations.

EDIT: My overall point is this was closer than most deals on here. Leafs fans have him getting multiple firsts, 2nds and prospects. Crazy trades.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 1
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 101
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Devils decline
Devil a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 8
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,612
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Quoting: Oodz
Did u not see see Jones and Risto got in return- as expiring deals. This deal isn’t even close to being Reilly’s trade value


makes sense that its not even close since Rielly is not Seth Jones by any stretch of the imagination. Its a garbage deal 100% leafs would never consider it, but Rielly is not a comparable to Jones, if he was the leafs would probably make it out of the first round every once in a while.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 15
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Very different situations.

EDIT: My overall point is this was closer than most deals on here. Leafs fans have him getting multiple firsts, 2nds and prospects. Crazy trades.


How was it different situations ? It feels like the leafs get the short end of the stick on every situation. U can’t tell me Reilly’s not better than both of those two dmen.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 17
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
makes sense that its not even close since Rielly is not Seth Jones by any stretch of the imagination. Its a garbage deal 100% leafs would never consider it, but Rielly is not a comparable to Jones, if he was the leafs would probably make it out of the first round every once in a while.


Are u kidding me? Do u actually think Seth Jones is a good dmen?? He’s an average top 4 guy and every stat proves it. He’s on one of the worst deals in the league. If u think he’s better than Reilly, you prolly don’t know the slightest about advanced stats.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 20
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Oodz
How was it different situations ? It feels like the leafs get the short end of the stick on every situation. U can’t tell me Reilly’s not better than both of those two dmen.


No, I misspoke. My point was in contrast the regular trades I see on here from leafs fans it's closer. Generally we see whacky trades that includes like two 1sts, a very good prospect, a very good roster player and sometimes more. Not to mention regularly moving him to teams that don't have room for him on the roster.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 20
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
No, I misspoke. My point was in contrast the regular trades I see on here from leafs fans it's closer. Generally we see whacky trades that includes like two 1sts, a very good prospect, a very roster player and sometimes more.


I see, what do u think is a fair trade for Mo
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 21
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,612
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Quoting: Oodz
Are u kidding me? Do u actually think Seth Jones is a good dmen?? He’s an average top 4 guy and every stat proves it. He’s on one of the worst deals in the league. If u think he’s better than Reilly, you prolly don’t know the slightest about advanced stats.


thanks for the good laugh to start my day. Never said i though seth jones was a good dman, just that he is better than Rielly.
Rielly isnt a top pairing dman on any real contender and yes Jones is the better dman, the contract is another story theres not many dman that should be making 9 mil or over you could look at the top 10 highest paid dman in the league and probably only 2 or 3 are actually worth the deal they are on.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 24
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
thanks for the good laugh to start my day. Never said i though seth jones was a good dman, just that he is better than Rielly.
Rielly isnt a top pairing dman on any real contender and yes Jones is the better dman, the contract is another story theres not many dman that should be making 9 mil or over you could look at the top 10 highest paid dman in the league and probably only 2 or 3 are actually worth the deal they are on.


Ok let me ask u this, what stat proves Seth Jones is better than Reilly? Or are u just ignorant like 90% of Habs fans ?
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 25
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Oodz
I see, what do u think is a fair trade for Mo


I think it depends on the team and the market at the time. I think the Leafs missed the boat on moving him. If they do/did want to move him, it's too late. Teams have already shored up their major holes and right now everyone else is just shoring up depth.

If this was a few months ago? I'd say a 1st + a good prospect is fair. Possibly adding a decent depth player for salary purposes if needed.

I can't see the Leafs moving him at the deadline unless they have a secondary move to adequately replace him, so in general I think the Reilly trade-ship has sailed. The Leafs might be able to get a little something for his rights after the season is over.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 27
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
thanks for the good laugh to start my day. Never said i though seth jones was a good dman, just that he is better than Rielly.
Rielly isnt a top pairing dman on any real contender and yes Jones is the better dman, the contract is another story theres not many dman that should be making 9 mil or over you could look at the top 10 highest paid dman in the league and probably only 2 or 3 are actually worth the deal they are on.


Jones is definitely overrated, but I still view him as a very good #2 dman. He's much more complete than Rielly. Rielly is a black hole defensively. Rielly definitely brings excellent offense, so there is major value in that, but he's not worth the same return as Jones.
16 sept. 2021 à 10 h 28
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 588
Mentions "j'aime": 278
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I think it depends on the team and the market at the time. I think the Leafs missed the boat on moving him. If they do/did want to move him, it's too late. Teams have already shored up their major holes and right now everyone else is just shoring up depth.

If this was a few months ago? I'd say a 1st + a good prospect is fair. Possibly adding a decent depth player for salary purposes if needed.

I can't see the Leafs moving him at the deadline unless they have a secondary move to adequately replace him, so in general I think the Reilly trade-ship has sailed. The Leafs might be able to get a little something for his rights after the season is over.


Ya makes sense, doesn’t make sense for a contending team to move a top 4 guy, unless they think Sandin can replace him.
Mr_Gardoki a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage