SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

biggest sellers at deadline

Créé par: sethjonesiselite
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 10 sept. 2021
Publié: 10 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Calling it rn, Anaheim will be having a fire sale this trade deadline. 4 of their 5 best players are pending UFAs. Here's how they dismantle their once promising 2015 core to look to the future:
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Benson, Tyler
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
The Oilers are one more forward depth away from getting past the 2nd round. Tyler Benson was never given a fair shot, may he have better luck in ANA
2.
ANA
  1. Clifton, Connor
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
finally getting rid of DeBrusk to get a RD that fits the Boston mold, and it seems any time these teams trade it ages like milk. (Ritchie and Kase trades). Third time's a charm?
3.
ANA
  1. Alexeyev, Alexander
  2. Kempný, Michal
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Lindholm is the most valuable trade piece the Ducks have. If they don't end up getting a first round pick, then at least should get a prospect projected to be top 2 d-man. Kempny is brought in simply to get WSH below the cap.
WSH
  1. Lindholm, Hampus (2 602 778 $ retained)
4.
ANA
  1. Hunt, Daemon
  2. Rask, Victor
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
I see a lot of Henrique trades so why not. Mainly to OTT but it doesn't make sense since they're taking the same approach as ANA and building from within. If Henrique can bounce back, he'll be a nice 2C or 3C for MIN and their center is meh.
MIN
  1. Henrique, Adam (1 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $62 908 528 $0 $3 200 000 $18 591 472 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 sept. 2021 à 12 h 56
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Bruins would be all over lindholm, not Manson.
Duggysdanglers a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2021 à 12 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,443
Mentions "j'aime": 4,149
If they are flopping at trade deadline, I could see Getzlaf waiving his no move for the right team. Getzlaf half retained to a champsionship potential team could net a decent return. Big, vet, centre, cheap contract at half retained or double retained. Could be another foligno type of scenario.
10 sept. 2021 à 13 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,266
Mentions "j'aime": 11,644
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
If they are flopping at trade deadline, I could see Getzlaf waiving his no move for the right team. Getzlaf half retained to a champsionship potential team could net a decent return. Big, vet, centre, cheap contract at half retained or double retained. Could be another foligno type of scenario.


That’s what he said last year as well, will go if he or Murray thinks it would help the future of the Ducks
10 sept. 2021 à 13 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,266
Mentions "j'aime": 11,644
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Bruins would be all over lindholm, not Manson.


I thought they needed RD not LD?
10 sept. 2021 à 13 h 8
#5
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,263
Mentions "j'aime": 4,353
too steep for Washington .... basically giving up 2 1st round picks for a rental... would rather pay far less and get Dunn
10 sept. 2021 à 13 h 10
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I thought they needed RD not LD?


Negative. Exact opposite. Their top two d men are both RD.
10 sept. 2021 à 13 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,266
Mentions "j'aime": 11,644
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Negative. Exact opposite. Their top two d men are both RD.


Apologies then, what would you give up for Lindholm yourself?
10 sept. 2021 à 13 h 15
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Apologies then, what would you give up for Lindholm yourself?


A first, debrusk, any prospect not named lysell
10 sept. 2021 à 13 h 17
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Edmonton accepts
Bruins clearly decline, by like a lot
Washington likely declines
The wild liekyl accept
10 sept. 2021 à 14 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Trade deadline is tough to predict accepting or declining deals soooo much can change between now and then. As things stand today I think that oilers trade looks fair I personally don’t like it but giving benson half a year to show what he can do is the deciding factor.
10 sept. 2021 à 14 h 24
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,752
Mentions "j'aime": 986
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I thought they needed RD not LD?


They got McAvoy & Carlo in the top 4 on the right side so idk about that
10 sept. 2021 à 14 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 699
Mentions "j'aime": 138
There's a lot of scenarios that could play out before the deadline!! If DeBrusk ends up having a productive season on the third line then I imagine he would stay! If Wagner, Kuhlman, Forbert, Haula, Nosek or Foligno don't move the needle then they possibly become trade bait! Either way, Manson wouldn't be the target. Lindholm for sure (with the hopes of an extension) and possibly Getzlaf for a cup run if he waives his NMC (and if 2C is still a sore spot with Hertl, Monahan, Trocheck and Barkov being unavailable).
sethjonesiselite a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2021 à 15 h 11
#13
Démarrer sujet
Jonesy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Capitalfail67
too steep for Washington .... basically giving up 2 1st round picks for a rental... would rather pay far less and get Dunn


how good is Tobias Geisser? Idk about Johansen but now that I think about it, the Caps want to make room for Alexeyev and Fehervary so I doubt they wanna lose Alexeyev.

Alt trade: Tobias Geisser, Michal Kempny, and 2022 1st conditional (1st if Lindholm re-signs w/WSH, 2nd if WSH makes past second round and Lindholm does NOT re-sign, 3rd if other cases) for Hampus Lindholm?
Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2021 à 15 h 15
#14
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,263
Mentions "j'aime": 4,353
Quoting: sethjonesiselite
how good is Tobias Geisser? Idk about Johansen but now that I think about it, the Caps want to make room for Alexeyev and Fehervary so I doubt they wanna lose Alexeyev.

Alt trade: Tobias Geisser, Michal Kempny, and 2022 1st conditional (1st if Lindholm re-signs w/WSH, 2nd if WSH makes past second round and Lindholm does NOT re-sign, 3rd if other cases) for Hampus Lindholm?


depending on how young the ducks want their D core to be Nardella is pretty high end. LucaJo is still pretty good but hes been hurt way to much for any team to really want him
10 sept. 2021 à 15 h 39
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,940
4 of the 5 best players are UFA's? News to me. Fowler, Comtois, Terry, Zegras, Lindholm (+Gibson but he's a Goalie). The only UFA is Lindholm...
10 sept. 2021 à 15 h 41
#16
Démarrer sujet
Jonesy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: TZ11
4 of the 5 best players are UFA's? News to me. Fowler, Comtois, Terry, Zegras, Lindholm (+Gibson but he's a Goalie). The only UFA is Lindholm...


Yeah it's debatable who the best players on ANA are but they definitely should make Comtois-Zegras-Terry their top line. They could easily break out and have individually great seasons.
10 sept. 2021 à 16 h 0
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,940
Quoting: sethjonesiselite
Yeah it's debatable who the best players on ANA are but they definitely should make Comtois-Zegras-Terry their top line. They could easily break out and have individually great seasons.


Manson is definitely not top 5 anymore and Rakell not really imo. I hope that's the top line next season and it sounds like it will be. It seems Eakins also wants to give Terry and Getzlaf another look although I don't really understand why because they weren't that good. Two passers. No one who can shoot really well. And Comtois should definitely play with Zegras.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage