SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

brand new first line U S

Créé par: NoWah49
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 9 sept. 2021
Publié: 9 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Beecher, John [Liste de réserve]
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
2.
BUF
  1. Backlund, Mikael
  2. Dubé, Dillon
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 775 000 $0 $0 $7 725 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
912 500 $912 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 sept. 2021 à 22 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,310
Mentions "j'aime": 3,987
A hefty overpay for Monahan and a drastic underpay for Eichel.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
9 sept. 2021 à 22 h 15
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,287
Mentions "j'aime": 19,535
Probably too much for Monahan, Boston can't fit him under the cap anyways, keep Backlund (who's not gonna waive) and just flip the assets gained from Monahan to Buffalo instead.
9 sept. 2021 à 22 h 17
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,287
Mentions "j'aime": 19,535
Quoting: Wqrrior
A hefty overpay for Monahan and a drastic underpay for Eichel.


Don't agree with this, add Moore to the Monahan trade or retention and it's pretty close. Currently it is an overpay but not by that much.
As for the Eichel trade, the value there is definitely over 4 1sts its just a combination of assets that Buffalo probably isn't looking for as well as no chance Backlund waives
9 sept. 2021 à 22 h 25
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,310
Mentions "j'aime": 3,987
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Don't agree with this, add Moore to the Monahan trade or retention and it's pretty close. Currently it is an overpay but not by that much.
As for the Eichel trade, the value there is definitely over 4 1sts its just a combination of assets that Buffalo probably isn't looking for as well as no chance Backlund waives


Remove Beecher from the Boston trade and it's fair.

Backlund doesn't have any value to Buffalo, and as you said won't waive. Dube to me isn't something Buffalo doesn't already have many of. If I'm buffalo, I'm not accepting unless both Zary and Mangiapane are in the deal. So those two and another pair of 1sts.
9 sept. 2021 à 22 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 781
Mentions "j'aime": 338
Im not sure either deal happens. You might be better off dropping the monahan to boston part and sending monahan to buffalo instead of dube and backlund who they don't want. Maybe get an olofsson or bjork with eichel depending on how well you do. Boston might be interested in a backlund deal...
9 sept. 2021 à 22 h 37
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,287
Mentions "j'aime": 19,535
Quoting: Wqrrior
Remove Beecher from the Boston trade and it's fair.

Backlund doesn't have any value to Buffalo, and as you said won't waive. Dube to me isn't something Buffalo doesn't already have many of. If I'm buffalo, I'm not accepting unless both Zary and Mangiapane are in the deal. So those two and another pair of 1sts.


I don't entirely disagree with removing Beecher but as it stands right now that puts Boston at least 2M over the cap, I think the price to dump Moore (or retain on Monahan) is around a 2nd, hence why I don't think the value is that far off.

Dube is actually the kind of player Buffalo would likely have interest in; proven team leader, fast skater, drive to win, relentless, still quite young, and has lots of team control. Mangiapane definitely won't be available and even if he was he could force his way out of Buffalo in 2 years due to his age. I agree that Zary would have to be involved.

My offer (and ive posted it before and gooten good feedback from both sides) would be Monahan + Zary + Dube + 2022 1st + a conditional pick on health. Then Monahan is flipped to the 3rd team (ie Boston) for like you said DeBrusk and a 1st in value (if Sabres retain or take back cap then it cost a little more)
9 sept. 2021 à 23 h 9
#7
BigTramFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 396
Mentions "j'aime": 86
Monahan won't waive to go to BUF though, but if his eventual destination (i.e. all part of the deal) is BOS, then he might
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
9 sept. 2021 à 23 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 795
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Don't agree with this, add Moore to the Monahan trade or retention and it's pretty close. Currently it is an overpay but not by that much.
As for the Eichel trade, the value there is definitely over 4 1sts its just a combination of assets that Buffalo probably isn't looking for as well as no chance Backlund waives


Monahan is a big overpay.
9 sept. 2021 à 23 h 11
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,310
Mentions "j'aime": 3,987
Quoting: UBS_ARENA
Monahan is a big overpay.


Yeah, and Moore's dump value isn't as drastic as a 2nd. It's a third tops.
9 sept. 2021 à 23 h 17
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
The rest of the league also knows that monahan just turned in a couple down years.
9 sept. 2021 à 23 h 21
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,287
Mentions "j'aime": 19,535
Quoting: Wqrrior
Yeah, and Moore's dump value isn't as drastic as a 2nd. It's a third tops.


it cost a 2nd to dump 1 year of Staal, it wont cost a 3rd to dump 2 years of Moore
9 sept. 2021 à 23 h 29
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,310
Mentions "j'aime": 3,987
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
it cost a 2nd to dump 1 year of Staal, it wont cost a 3rd to dump 2 years of Moore


If its a TDL trade its essentially one year, and his buyout is significantly less than staals to where it is feasible. If anything we should be using Panik as the comparison, since his cap was the same. That cost a 2nd for 3 years, but also that was widely seen as a drastic overpay.

Even at that, Monahan for Debrusk, Moore, 1st and 3rd is good value.
9 sept. 2021 à 23 h 33
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,287
Mentions "j'aime": 19,535
Quoting: Wqrrior
If its a TDL trade its essentially one year, and his buyout is significantly less than staals to where it is feasible. If anything we should be using Panik as the comparison, since his cap was the same. That cost a 2nd for 3 years, but also that was widely seen as a drastic overpay.

Even at that, Monahan for Debrusk, Moore, 1st and 3rd is good value.


It wouldn't be TDL, Eichel is still more likely trad3d this summer than during the year. And Monahan wont be traded unless Eichel is going to Calgary. As for buyout, that can't be done again until the beginning of next summer
9 sept. 2021 à 23 h 54
#14
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
White has more value to Ottawa than DeBrusk, who’s had declining 5v5 p/60 numbers since his rookie season, and hasn’t been a top6 forward the last two seasons.
10 sept. 2021 à 0 h 6
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 795
Quoting: Wqrrior
Yeah, and Moore's dump value isn't as drastic as a 2nd. It's a third tops.


No its not. 5.5m in a cap dump is actually a 2nd on the money.
10 sept. 2021 à 0 h 18
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,786
Mentions "j'aime": 8,836
Pass on that
10 sept. 2021 à 0 h 29
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,310
Mentions "j'aime": 3,987
Quoting: sensibleguy
White has more value to Ottawa than DeBrusk, who’s had declining 5v5 p/60 numbers since his rookie season, and hasn’t been a top6 forward the last two seasons.


I don't really see a long term place for either of these players, but its easier to flip DeBrusk because less teams will hold off due to White's contract.
10 sept. 2021 à 1 h 5
#18
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: Wqrrior
I don't really see a long term place for either of these players, but its easier to flip DeBrusk because less teams will hold off due to White's contract.


One of them is a centre
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage