SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who would you rather have and why

Créé par: The_Rocket
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 9 sept. 2021
Publié: 9 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Use any argument you’d like: age, contract, analytics, points, icetime, historical success, team, whatever. Who would you rather have on your team
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $68 450 659 $648 780 $2 550 000 $13 049 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 sept. 2021 à 2 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
Morrissey very easily.
9 sept. 2021 à 6 h 46
#2
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I'm taking Morrissey, but it's surprisingly closer than I thought it would be....
9 sept. 2021 à 8 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,173
Mentions "j'aime": 697
What?!?! Is this a real offer? Did Winnipeg agree to this? Did OEL waive his NMC for this???

CALL THE LEAGUE!! CALL THE LEAGUE!!!
9 sept. 2021 à 8 h 38
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,455
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
Quoting: Lenny7
I'm taking Morrissey, but it's surprisingly closer than I thought it would be....


When you say it's closer than you thought...

Is there a voting option on Cap Friendly and I don't see it?
9 sept. 2021 à 8 h 50
#5
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Xspyrit
When you say it's closer than you thought...

Is there a voting option on Cap Friendly and I don't see it?


No, no voting...I just compared them on hockey-reference. OEL playing a offence first role would probably be a more fitting role for him with Vancouver, but I can't see his zone starts changing much given that Hughes is there.

Edit: I'd be taking Morrissey based on age and contract though.
9 sept. 2021 à 8 h 56
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,455
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
Quoting: Lenny7
No, no voting...I just compared them on hockey-reference. OEL playing a offence first role would probably be a more fitting role for him with Vancouver, but I can't see his zone starts changing much given that Hughes is there.

Edit: I'd be taking Morrissey based on age and contract though.


Same, Morrissey based on age and contract though

Depends what team you are though, if you're a team like Pittsburgh or Washington trying to win "one last time", maybe you'd be tempted to go with OEL and hope he plays at his old form when you need it

As for the voting, I thought it was the case as I have seen a similar comment a few times. It'd be great if there was. Some kind of like/dislike function for every trade proposal, like you approve the trade or not.
9 sept. 2021 à 9 h 27
#7
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Xspyrit
Same, Morrissey based on age and contract though

Depends what team you are though, if you're a team like Pittsburgh or Washington trying to win "one last time", maybe you'd be tempted to go with OEL and hope he plays at his old form when you need it

As for the voting, I thought it was the case as I have seen a similar comment a few times. It'd be great if there was. Some kind of like/dislike function for every trade proposal, like you approve the trade or not.


I do feel like a lot of OEL's issues stem from poor usage, but I could be completely wrong...I don't spend a lot of time watching Yotes games, aside from when they play the Ducks and he doesn't "look" bad, though the eye test can be deceiving.

As for a like/dislike function-They used to have that, but I assume they removed it because it ended up being more of a "trash" based comment sections, without any form of feedback. There's rarely a trade posted on here that doesn't get dumped on by one fan base or the other. You're also never (maybe rarely...) going to get an unbiased vote, based purely off of the size of each fanbase that is represented on here.
Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
9 sept. 2021 à 12 h 44
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,816
Mentions "j'aime": 623
Morrissey because he’s younger, better, and isn’t as overpaid
9 sept. 2021 à 14 h 44
#9
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,916
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: Canucks33
Morrissey very easily.


Quoting: CJets
Morrissey because he’s younger, better, and isn’t as overpaid


Curious as to what makes Morrissey the easy choice, or why he is better than OEL. They score at a similar rate, OEL has better underlying numbers, they both play tough matchups, and both of them are brutal in their own ends.

Quoting: Xspyrit
Same, Morrissey based on age and contract though

Depends what team you are though, if you're a team like Pittsburgh or Washington trying to win "one last time", maybe you'd be tempted to go with OEL and hope he plays at his old form when you need it

As for the voting, I thought it was the case as I have seen a similar comment a few times. It'd be great if there was. Some kind of like/dislike function for every trade proposal, like you approve the trade or not.


This position makes sense. Morrissey is $1 million less (though one extra year) and 4 years younger. Maybe he doesnt deteriorate as much over the life of his contract compared to OEL
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage