SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Roll in the Tanks

Créé par: areax91
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 7 sept. 2021
Publié: 7 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is the worst-case scenario should the 21-22 season go south for the Sharks and Kane not have his contract terminated. San Jose is... not in the best of situations with their contracts and cap management but a few tweaks should make this silent rebuild less painful for fans while ensuring more top prospects refresh their farm system.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3850 000 $
3750 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
44 250 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
33 500 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
12 250 000 $
32 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Frost, Morgan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Lindblom, Oskar
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
PHI
    Hertl trade made in 21-22 trade deadline day.
    2.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
    CBJ
    1. Simek, Radim
    Détails additionnels:
    21-22 deadline day trade
    3.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
    3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (ARI)
    FLA
    1. Burns, Brent (4 000 000 $ retained)
    2. Merkley, Ryan
    4.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (COL)
    SEA
    1. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
    5.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (DET)
    2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (DET)
    6.
    SJS
    1. Kuokkanen, Janne
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
    3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
    7.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
    OTT
    1. Chmelevski, Alexander [Droits de RFA]
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de DET
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de DET
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2481 500 000 $74 067 501 $0 $215 000 $7 432 499 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    894 167 $894 167 $
    AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    1 825 000 $1 825 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    7 sept. 2021 à 14 h 23
    #1
    Bad Take Bot v1.02
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 2,683
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
    that Burns trade is just eww.
    Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
    7 sept. 2021 à 14 h 28
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 595
    Mentions "j'aime": 230
    Quoting: Klara
    that Burns trade is just eww.


    I know the Burns trade is not ideal, however, I'm not sure how else we can get out of some of the contracts we have. It's critical for the Sharks to get as many picks as possible and Burns can still perform as an offensive D for a playoff contender that can cover for him defensively. Not to mention that Merkley has been overtaken by Kniazev, Ferraro, and Knyzhov in the young D pecking order and that he will likely need a change in scenery to get himself together.
    7 sept. 2021 à 14 h 30
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 4,742
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
    Detroit has no need for Bonino.
    aedoran et will9739 a aimé ceci.
    7 sept. 2021 à 14 h 33
    #4
    Subbanator
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 7,188
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,227
    If the Hertle trade comes with an extension Philly does it. I think you could easily get more for Meier to
    7 sept. 2021 à 14 h 39
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 10,970
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,542
    Quoting: areax91
    I know the Burns trade is not ideal, however, I'm not sure how else we can get out of some of the contracts we have. It's critical for the Sharks to get as many picks as possible and Burns can still perform as an offensive D for a playoff contender that can cover for him defensively. Not to mention that Merkley has been overtaken by Kniazev, Ferraro, and Knyzhov in the young D pecking order and that he will likely need a change in scenery to get himself together.


    Merkley is still very much in our future plans, and the 3 you mentioned are all LD and Merkley is our only above average RD prospect, so until you have someone to replace him let him develop.
    and that return would still be weak if we retain that much on burns.
    7 sept. 2021 à 14 h 45
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 10,970
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,542
    Quoting: BStinson
    Detroit has no need for Bonino.


    I think this is purely hypothetical and if your in playoff contention he would be a valuable asset, however I would like him to stay and help mentor the kids.
    7 sept. 2021 à 14 h 46
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 10,970
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,542
    Pavelski will take closer to 1-2 years 4.5-5 mil after his last season and the playoff run the year before.
    you have 1 real RD and 5 LD on this lineup and only 1 true RW, i would consider a better balance going forward.
    7 sept. 2021 à 14 h 54
    #8
    Bad Take Bot v1.02
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 2,683
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
    Quoting: areax91
    I know the Burns trade is not ideal, however, I'm not sure how else we can get out of some of the contracts we have. It's critical for the Sharks to get as many picks as possible and Burns can still perform as an offensive D for a playoff contender that can cover for him defensively. Not to mention that Merkley has been overtaken by Kniazev, Ferraro, and Knyzhov in the young D pecking order and that he will likely need a change in scenery to get himself together.


    Merkley is still worth about a 2nd, which means Burns with 50% retention is only getting a 3rd and a 7th, and that is really really really bad.
    7 sept. 2021 à 15 h 19
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 1,136
    Mentions "j'aime": 444
    Not only would you have to pay to dumb a 36-year-old with three years of term, and making 4M even after 50% of retention, the Panthers are in no position to acquire Burns. They have cap problems of their own with Barkov and Huby to sign.

    Burns nowadays is good for 40 points a season plus defensive headaches. Kinda like Yandle, who the Panthers just bought out.
    7 sept. 2021 à 15 h 39
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,130
    Philly doesn't need a center
    7 sept. 2021 à 15 h 40
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 39,600
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,154
    I think its about right on NJD deal - Kuok plus a 2nd has been my benchmark.
    I also think Devils would consider Bonino if they turn into buyers over next year.
    Could be nice bridge to Mercer at 3C.
    7 sept. 2021 à 16 h 7
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 1,071
    Mentions "j'aime": 445
    I'd do that Hertl trade

    And i'd think you could get more for Meier than that
    7 sept. 2021 à 17 h 33
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,025
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,569
    Don’t like the Burns or Meier trade for the sharks.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage