SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Revisiting an old idea post signing day

Créé par: Hawkisles
Équipe: 2021-22 Islanders de New York
Date de création initiale: 2 sept. 2021
Publié: 2 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This doesn’t need to be the forward line up we use, this is mainly just to show how much a middle six center wing gives Trotz options to mess with the lines and find what works. Maybe Nelson is the elusive destined winger for Barzal? Maybe Strome is? Or maybe Strome fills in on a very dangerous third line? Who knows, either way, this team now effectively has three dangerous lines no matter what match ups you make.

I think Chicago would at least be interested in this. They have a surplus of LHDs and Strome has reportedly been shopped this offseason. This trade could give them futures a rebuilder like them would want to have.
Transactions
1.
NYI
  1. De Haan, Calvin
  2. Strome, Dylan
Détails additionnels:
Isles get the LHD they need on a low risk contract length and a young middle six center-wing that adds on to the Isles already ridiculous depth.
CHI
  1. Bolduc, Samuel
  2. Hickey, Thomas
  3. Pánik, Richard
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
Hawks get two good futures from Bolduc and the 1st rounder and a 3rd rounder as a sweetener. Paník and Hickey are cap dumps, but both could be buried to the point where they barely affect Chicago’s cap hit.
2.
NYI
    Anywhere
    CHI
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de COL
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    2023
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    2024
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de NYI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $81 596 688 $1 365 854 $1 357 500 $-96 688 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, AG, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    725 000 $725 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    2 sept. 2021 à 20 h 39
    #1
    exo2769
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 15,603
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,697
    If I'm the Hawks I do the 1st trade.
    Hawkisles a aimé ceci.
    2 sept. 2021 à 20 h 47
    #2
    Chicago
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 6,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
    Quoting: exo2769
    If I'm the Hawks I do the 1st trade.


    Maybe, the hawks need one more LD that can play in the top 4, and potentially a 2nd line RW. This is a good package, but I have to imagine the hawks moving Strome would be for a top 4 LD or a middle 6 RW. This trade is a really solid offer, but I don't think the hawks brought in Jones, Fleury, and McCabe this season to take cap dumps. I'm not sure Panik can play that role anymore.
    2 sept. 2021 à 20 h 55
    #3
    Kyle from Chicago
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2018
    Messages: 9,831
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
    Quoting: exo2769
    If I'm the Hawks I do the 1st trade.


    Quoting: NickC1988
    Maybe, the hawks need one more LD that can play in the top 4, and potentially a 2nd line RW. This is a good package, but I have to imagine the hawks moving Strome would be for a top 4 LD or a middle 6 RW. This trade is a really solid offer, but I don't think the hawks brought in Jones, Fleury, and McCabe this season to take cap dumps. I'm not sure Panik can play that role anymore.

    I don’t know, I don’t feel like this makes us significantly better. Strome and De Hann are both good players and we don’t seem to be getting players or assets of equal quality back. De Hann specifically is a good 2nd pair guy, and I don’t feel confident in anyone except for Beaudin to take his spot in the lineup. The first round pick is sure to be at the end of the round, and the prospect probably isn’t going to be better than De Hann.
    2 sept. 2021 à 20 h 58
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,380
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Stan_Bowman
    I don’t know, I don’t feel like this makes us significantly better. Strome and De Hann are both good players and we don’t seem to be getting players or assets of equal quality back. De Hann specifically is a good 2nd pair guy, and I don’t feel confident in anyone except for Beaudin to take his spot in the lineup. The first round pick is sure to be at the end of the round, and the prospect probably isn’t going to be better than De Hann.


    Is de Haan that good. I always thought of him as a #4-5, like a decent/acceptable second pair guy or a good third pairing. Kinda deeper than a good second pairing. I'll admit I haven't seen much of him since he went to chi town
    2 sept. 2021 à 21 h 7
    #5
    exo2769
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 15,603
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,697
    Quoting: Stan_Bowman
    I don’t know, I don’t feel like this makes us significantly better. Strome and De Hann are both good players and we don’t seem to be getting players or assets of equal quality back. De Hann specifically is a good 2nd pair guy, and I don’t feel confident in anyone except for Beaudin to take his spot in the lineup. The first round pick is sure to be at the end of the round, and the prospect probably isn’t going to be better than De Hann.


    I should probably caveat that Toews needs to be ok...which is a clear assumption. As far as the deal goes. Bolduc is a really good prospect. I'd place him as another 1st round pick. The two cap dumps are indeed dumps, but the Hawks still have less cap. I don't think the Isles do it because they need to find a home for Leo. But I'd do it.
    2 sept. 2021 à 21 h 18
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 2,156
    Mentions "j'aime": 521
    Quoting: NickC1988
    Maybe, the hawks need one more LD that can play in the top 4, and potentially a 2nd line RW. This is a good package, but I have to imagine the hawks moving Strome would be for a top 4 LD or a middle 6 RW. This trade is a really solid offer, but I don't think the hawks brought in Jones, Fleury, and McCabe this season to take cap dumps. I'm not sure Panik can play that role anymore.


    I feel Chicago could flip those picks for what you’d need. Though hearing this makes me wonder about a three way trade
    2 sept. 2021 à 21 h 21
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 2,156
    Mentions "j'aime": 521
    Quoting: Stan_Bowman
    I don’t know, I don’t feel like this makes us significantly better. Strome and De Hann are both good players and we don’t seem to be getting players or assets of equal quality back. De Hann specifically is a good 2nd pair guy, and I don’t feel confident in anyone except for Beaudin to take his spot in the lineup. The first round pick is sure to be at the end of the round, and the prospect probably isn’t going to be better than De Hann.


    I can comfortably guess Bolduc has a higher ceiling than de Haan’s current talent, especially when you consider how quickly de Haan’s playstyle will age him.

    I feel like while yes, Chicago gets a bit worse here, these assets really help them along while losing assets they don’t need or are actively shopping.
    2 sept. 2021 à 21 h 21
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 3,455
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,624
    Absolutely not from the Isles. Have no need for Strome and De Haan is worth at most a 3rd. Isles are not trading a 1st and their top d prospect for that.
    2 sept. 2021 à 22 h 3
    #9
    Chicago
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 6,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
    Quoting: Hawkisles
    I feel Chicago could flip those picks for what you’d need. Though hearing this makes me wonder about a three way trade


    Potentially, but cap would be very limited, so I'm not sure it would work for them.
    2 sept. 2021 à 22 h 11
    #10
    You owe us picks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 447
    Mentions "j'aime": 163
    Quoting: BCAPP
    Is de Haan that good. I always thought of him as a #4-5, like a decent/acceptable second pair guy or a good third pairing. Kinda deeper than a good second pairing. I'll admit I haven't seen much of him since he went to chi town


    Leddy was better, De Haan would be a down grade. There's a reason Lou let him walk in free agency.
    BCAPP a aimé ceci.
    2 sept. 2021 à 22 h 28
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,269
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,915
    hawks accept
    3 sept. 2021 à 8 h 30
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 2,156
    Mentions "j'aime": 521
    Quoting: Warrior24
    Absolutely not from the Isles. Have no need for Strome and De Haan is worth at most a 3rd. Isles are not trading a 1st and their top d prospect for that.


    Here’s how I hash it out:

    3rd= Take Paník and Hickey (it’d normally be more, but taking on de Haan’s contract does a lot to make it a 3rd)
    Bolduc=de Haan
    1st=Strome

    I feel like the only part of that that’s bad for the Isles is Bolduc for de Haan… maybe Aho instead of Bolduc in this trade?
    3 sept. 2021 à 8 h 44
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 3,455
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,624
    Quoting: Hawkisles
    Here’s how I hash it out:

    3rd= Take Paník and Hickey (it’d normally be more, but taking on de Haan’s contract does a lot to make it a 3rd)
    Bolduc=de Haan
    1st=Strome

    I feel like the only part of that that’s bad for the Isles is Bolduc for de Haan… maybe Aho instead of Bolduc in this trade?


    Isles don’t need to dump contracts they can bury them and save cap.

    De Haan is not even close to Bolducs value.

    Isles have no need, nor want strome.
    3 sept. 2021 à 8 h 52
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 2,156
    Mentions "j'aime": 521
    Quoting: Warrior24
    Isles don’t need to dump contracts they can bury them and save cap.

    De Haan is not even close to Bolducs value.

    Isles have no need, nor want strome.


    They’ll need to dump cap if they add, and they really should add given how close they are to a Cup.

    In retrospect, yeah, Bolduc is way more valuable. I’m thinking Aho instead by this point.

    Isles don’t need Strome specifically, but with as many older forwards as they have, they might want to consider adding a guy who’ll still be good even after Lee, Bailey, Palmieri, etc are all too old to contribute like they used to.
    3 sept. 2021 à 9 h 28
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 3,455
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,624
    Quoting: Hawkisles
    They’ll need to dump cap if they add, and they really should add given how close they are to a Cup.

    In retrospect, yeah, Bolduc is way more valuable. I’m thinking Aho instead by this point.

    Isles don’t need Strome specifically, but with as many older forwards as they have, they might want to consider adding a guy who’ll still be good even after Lee, Bailey, Palmieri, etc are all too old to contribute like they used to.


    The Isles forwards are set, and strome does not fit nor do the isles want him. You also are overvaluing him, unless he has a good year he is worth a 2nd. And I believe Lee, Bailey and Palmeri will all produce equal or better then him for the next 4 years.

    The only way the isles trade for de Haan is if it is Hickey and a 4th for de Haan. At this point you cannot count on de Haan to play more then 60 games. The benefit to the hawks is after you bury Hickey you saved about 3m in cap.
    3 sept. 2021 à 11 h 8
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 2,156
    Mentions "j'aime": 521
    Quoting: Warrior24
    The Isles forwards are set, and strome does not fit nor do the isles want him. You also are overvaluing him, unless he has a good year he is worth a 2nd. And I believe Lee, Bailey and Palmeri will all produce equal or better then him for the next 4 years.

    The only way the isles trade for de Haan is if it is Hickey and a 4th for de Haan. At this point you cannot count on de Haan to play more then 60 games. The benefit to the hawks is after you bury Hickey you saved about 3m in cap.


    Here’s why I value Strome at a 1st rounder:

    - The first rounder will be a late one
    - Strome would still be RFA by the end of this season, meaning unless he has his best year yet coming up, he won’t leave in free agency and will likely get another similarly cheap contract at the end of this year
    - Strome has the potential to be a good 2nd line center-wing, he’s shown he can score at a high pace before. I see Strome as very low risk high reward while he’s still RFA; either we lose a late 1st rounder for a low cap hit point per two games kind of guy (worth it) or Strome lives up to his potential and we strike gold (even more worth it)

    Young RFA center wings are a rare commodity, and its even rarer when a team wants to sell low on one.

    But hey, if the Isles can nab Strome for a 2nd I’d be very happy with that!
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage