SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

De Hann to Islanders Strome to MTL and Lindholm to Chicago

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 1 sept. 2021
Publié: 1 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Convoluted, but also beautiful.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
De Hann is still a good 2nd pair LD and this pick is late. Islanders can afford to make this move.
NYI
  1. De Haan, Calvin
  2. Shaw, Andrew
Détails additionnels:
Since the islanders are already using off-season LTIR, Shaw can allow them to exceed the cap by his cap hit.

If you are confused about why Shaw allows the islanders to get De Hann without sending cap back then ask in the comments but the short explanation is

Islanders are using off-season LTIR with Boychuck (6 mil) they have about 2 mil of that space left unused.

They can acquire and put Shaw on LTIR (Boychuck 6 AAV + Shaw’s 3.9 = 9.9 AAV)

Acquiring De Hann would only cost them 650k on their existing relief pool. That cap space goes away at the seasons start.
2.
CHI
    Flips offer-sheet compensation of KK to Chicago for Strome.
    MTL
    1. Strome, Dylan
    Détails additionnels:
    Purely hypothetical, but see my recent post about how KK being offersheeted make me believe that is a comparable for a Strome deal.
    3.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
    CAR
      Prior trade.
      4.
      CHI
      1. Lindholm, Hampus
      Détails additionnels:
      Extension
      ANA
      1. Beaudin, Nicolas
      2. Johnson, Reese
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
      4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (COL)
      5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
      Détails additionnels:
      Comparable to the Seth Jones deal.
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2022
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CHI
      2023
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      2024
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $62 319 450 $452 439 $3 382 500 $19 180 550 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      997 500 $997 500 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
      C, AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
      AD
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      874 125 $874 125 $
      AD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      C
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      AD, C, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
      AG, C, AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      975 000 $975 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      800 000 $800 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      850 000 $850 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
      DG
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 1
      Équipe de réserve
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance307 500 $$308K)
      AG, C
      RFA - 3

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      These moves make sense for all teams involved?
      Le graphique a été masqué

      Options de sondage


      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 11
      #26
      Billy739
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2017
      Messages: 6,590
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
      Quoting: exo2769
      If it's a higher cap hit...he would have either A.) Earned it or B.) You can let him walk. If Drouin doesn't make a monster comeback...he's a cap dump. At least if Strome stinks...you just let him walk.


      MTL is good with Drouin
      Fans might not be but they can suck it
      GM is , His new Coach who coached him in Junior to a Memorial Cup is and so it his team
      They're all happy with Drouin because without him our middle of the league power play is bottom of the league

      He has his faults but come PP time he's consistent as the day is long
      Drouin scored more in 2 years on PP then Strome in his career
      That has value to a team like MTL even if he is 1-2m over paid
      Why ?
      As last year showed no one else can fill that role
      If they could maybe we'd have made the finals more competitive
      exo2769 a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 15
      #27
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 18,989
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
      Quoting: Billy739
      Drouin gets crapped on because of his contract like you said
      Take it away and everyone loves him

      KK and Strome will face these situations
      KK because of the OS
      Strome because CHI has no choice but to pay
      MTL if they acquired him would have no choice but to pay

      We already got Suzuki to worry about


      Chicago does have a choice, either to trade Strome or not sign him and his numbers at arbitration at this point aren't going to award him a $6M contract. Players don't want to use arbitration unless they want to burn the house down with their current team and then they are damaged goods and end up getting traded. Zadarov for the Hawks is a good example and didn't work out in his favor.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 17
      #28
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 18,989
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
      Quoting: exo2769
      It's all dependent on Toews and what condition he's in to come back. As a Hawks fan, I would not do the swap all by itself. The 30th pick in the draft isn't exciting. Having center depth for a playoff run is exciting. With that said...if Stan could somehow convince ANA into a 3-way trade, Then yes I would. Hampus would indeed be a VERY nice piece to have. This would introduct another problem next year with the cap, but Hampus is indeed a very good player.

      As a side note...I think ANA would actually rather have Vlasic. The 6'6" defensive Dman next to Drysdale would be perfect.


      I think a three way makes sense or a direct trade with Anaheim and save on the picks. Strome + Beaudin or Nylander + a 3rd is plenty to pry a rental in Lindholm. He's not Jones or Hamilton type of value in the market. He's very good but he's never in the discussion for the top 10 or even 20 d men in the league.
      exo2769 a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 18
      #29
      exo2769
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2015
      Messages: 15,595
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,675
      Quoting: Billy739
      MTL is good with Drouin
      Fans might not be but they can suck it
      GM is , His new Coach who coached him in Junior to a Memorial Cup is and so it his team
      They're all happy with Drouin because without him our middle of the league power play is bottom of the league

      He has his faults but come PP time he's consistent as the day is long
      Drouin scored more in 2 years on PP then Strome in his career
      That has value to a team like MTL even if he is 1-2m over paid
      Why ?
      As last year showed no one else can fill that role
      If they could maybe we'd have made the finals more competitive


      I actually agree with you about MTL keeping Drouin. That's the best place for him. My comments were more around the options. IF hypothetically Drouin stinks...you're stuck. IF hypothetically he's great...then his $5.5M cap hit will be justified. Now translate that to Strome at the Hawks. If Strome's cap hit increases to $5.5M...great he would have earned it. IF Strome's cap hit for some reason jumps to that amount, but you didn't think he earned it. Then you don't need to worry about it. Let him walk and spend the $5.5M in "better ways". That's all.
      Billy739 a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 19
      #30
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2019
      Messages: 561
      Mentions "j'aime": 189
      I don’t think you understand how ltir works.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 21
      #31
      exo2769
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2015
      Messages: 15,595
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,675
      Quoting: Trotz2020
      I don’t think you understand how ltir works.


      He does. It's different in the summer than it is during the season. Boychuck and Seabs will LTIR in the summer. If you take someone into the season and then LTIR it's different.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 22
      #32
      Démarrer sujet
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 9,831
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      I think a three way makes sense or a direct trade with Anaheim and save on the picks. Strome + Beaudin or Nylander + a 3rd is plenty to pry a rental in Lindholm. He's not Jones or Hamilton type of value in the market. He's very good but he's never in the discussion for the top 10 or even 20 d men in the league.


      I think Strome + Beaudin as a base for Lindholm makes sense, but with the D market being so crazy right now I think ANA wants a first round pick plus other assets in the deal for Lindholm with an extension.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 22
      #33
      Démarrer sujet
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 9,831
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
      Quoting: Trotz2020
      I don’t think you understand how ltir works.


      I don’t think you understand how ltir works.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 23
      #34
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2020
      Messages: 4,742
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
      https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2758806

      Doesn’t look like NYI is compliant
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 25
      #35
      Démarrer sujet
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 9,831
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
      Quoting: BStinson
      https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2758806

      Doesn’t look like NYI is compliant


      I’m sure there are ways that that 29k can be achieved.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 25
      #36
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 18,989
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      I think Strome + Beaudin as a base for Lindholm makes sense, but with the D market being so crazy right now I think ANA wants a first round pick plus other assets in the deal for Lindholm with an extension.


      The center market isn't too shabby either, but again, Lindholm isn't Jones or Hamilton or even Reilly (who might get traded).
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 26
      #37
      Billy739
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2017
      Messages: 6,590
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
      Quoting: exo2769
      I actually agree with you about MTL keeping Drouin. That's the best place for him. My comments were more around the options. IF hypothetically Drouin stinks...you're stuck. IF hypothetically he's great...then his $5.5M cap hit will be justified. Now translate that to Strome at the Hawks. If Strome's cap hit increases to $5.5M...great he would have earned it. IF Strome's cap hit for some reason jumps to that amount, but you didn't think he earned it. Then you don't need to worry about it. Let him walk and spend the $5.5M in "better ways". That's all.


      O Well i misunderstood the context of your point my bad
      I agree with what you're saying in regards to Strome being your Drouin more or less

      You guys need the Goal Scoring Strome and have Toews to handle bulk faceoffs to make up for his Faceoff issues
      We dont really have that and would need any center taking over to be able to handle themselves for 900-1100 faceoffs at 50%+ a year

      If we still had Danault this becomes a little less far fetched
      exo2769 a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 27
      #38
      exo2769
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2015
      Messages: 15,595
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,675
      Quoting: Billy739
      O Well i misunderstood the context of your point my bad
      I agree with what you're saying in regards to Strome being your Drouin more or less

      You guys need the Goal Scoring Strome and have Toews to handle bulk faceoffs to make up for his Faceoff issues
      We dont really have that and would need any center taking over to be able to handle themselves for 900-1100 faceoffs at 50%+ a year

      If we still had Danault this becomes a little less far fetched


      I probably wasn't very clear! My bad cheers
      Billy739 a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 28
      #39
      Démarrer sujet
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 9,831
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      The center market isn't too shabby either, but again, Lindholm isn't Jones or Hamilton or even Reilly (who might get traded).


      Right now is a great time to trade a Center, in any case I hope the hawks maximize on their center depth with a move.
      Billy739, ChiHawk et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 29
      #40
      Rangers 2023
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2017
      Messages: 19,043
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
      Quoting: mastersp4
      KK would never receive a 6,1M OS oh wait.....


      KK is much better asset
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 32
      #41
      Démarrer sujet
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 9,831
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
      Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
      KK is much better asset


      That’s debatable, KK is a couple years younger than Strome but that’s the only place he has him beat. Strome has a better Cap hit, drives offense much better, and has a better history of production. Not sure about faceoffs, but I don’t rate them extremely highly in any case.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 46
      #42
      Roster Architect
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2021
      Messages: 2,643
      Mentions "j'aime": 909
      Quoting: exo2769
      AZ isn't trading away Dvorak for a 1st and 3rd. AZ needs MORE Dvorak's not less. He's on a really good contract and that's a premium to budget teams like AZ. Romanov would be required for Dvorak.


      The reported ask for Dvorak was already mentioned as the same as what Kuemper got (a 1st and a quality prospect), which is far better value than giving up a 1st and a 3rd for Strome.

      Romanov would not be included for Dvorak. It's likely around a 1st + Norlinder + mid round pick. Which is a way better deal than going after Strome.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 49
      #43
      Billy739
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2017
      Messages: 6,590
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      That’s debatable, KK is a couple years younger than Strome but that’s the only place he has him beat. Strome has a better Cap hit, drives offense much better, and has a better history of production. Not sure about faceoffs, but I don’t rate them extremely highly in any case.


      Im a habs Fans and i think its pretty much on par
      KK has value dont get me wrong but he's no better a Center then Strome
      But Strome is a MUCH Superior Winger then KK by a country mile

      KK only gets a 1st and a 3rd on OS's
      Strome gets a 1st in most situations even if they are conditional
      I dont think anyone expected KK to get that offer , even i didnt
      But that said i wouldnt have been alright giving him up without an over pay

      I think if you can find a deal with TBL to bring Killorn on in a package for Strome that you could get that 1st and 3rd if not more
      They're in Cap hell and you offer them a Strome and the cap to re-sign him i think they'll happily pay
      Plus there's upside in having Killorn-Johnson back together to so its not like you're taking a cap dump just exploiting TBL cap situation
      exo2769 a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 50
      #44
      exo2769
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2015
      Messages: 15,595
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,675
      Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
      KK is much better asset


      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      That’s debatable, KK is a couple years younger than Strome but that’s the only place he has him beat. Strome has a better Cap hit, drives offense much better, and has a better history of production. Not sure about faceoffs, but I don’t rate them extremely highly in any case.


      Their paths are more alike that people think. Yes, the younger player is perceived to have a higher upside. That just comes with the territory. Projections are always rosie. Both #3 OA picks. Both approx. 6'2" 200 lbs. and neither are very speedy.
      KK was a ppg AHLer. KK's 1st 115 games got him 42 points
      DS was a ppg AHLer. DS's 1st 106 games got him 69 points
      Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 17 h 36
      #45
      Habs 2010
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2020
      Messages: 1,514
      Mentions "j'aime": 941
      Quoting: exo2769
      Their paths are more alike that people think. Yes, the younger player is perceived to have a higher upside. That just comes with the territory. Projections are always rosie. Both #3 OA picks. Both approx. 6'2" 200 lbs. and neither are very speedy.
      KK was a ppg AHLer. KK's 1st 115 games got him 42 points
      DS was a ppg AHLer. DS's 1st 106 games got him 69 points


      I agree Strome and KK are very similar... it's odd that I'm not particularly interested in paying a 1st and 3rd for Strome, yet I've been debating with myself over matching the KK offersheet every day since it's come out... even though KK will cost $6.1M and Strome makes $3M.

      The reason I'm on the fence over Strome isn't because it's not fair value, it totally is, but I'd rather see MTL just give guys like Drouin, Evans, and Poehling a chance while signing Bozak as a contingency. I believe one of those 3 players will suprise as a top 6 C so I'm willing to take the chance and keep the picks.
      exo2769 et Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
      1 sept. 2021 à 20 h 34
      #46
      Démarrer sujet
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 9,831
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
      Quoting: Shanesaw9
      I agree Strome and KK are very similar... it's odd that I'm not particularly interested in paying a 1st and 3rd for Strome, yet I've been debating with myself over matching the KK offersheet every day since it's come out... even though KK will cost $6.1M and Strome makes $3M.

      The reason I'm on the fence over Strome isn't because it's not fair value, it totally is, but I'd rather see MTL just give guys like Drouin, Evans, and Poehling a chance while signing Bozak as a contingency. I believe one of those 3 players will suprise as a top 6 C so I'm willing to take the chance and keep the picks.


      This is a reasonable mindset to have, it also opens up the door for a future move (for strome or otherwise) if you don’t get the center development that you need out of those guys.
      Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
      2 sept. 2021 à 13 h 46
      #47
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 1,965
      Mentions "j'aime": 601
      Quoting: TrueCanuck
      For Strome of Dvorak?


      Dvorak
      2 sept. 2021 à 15 h 15
      #48
      Roster Architect
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2021
      Messages: 2,643
      Mentions "j'aime": 909
      Quoting: Bolts20Cup
      Dvorak


      Elliotte Friedman already reported that the cost that Arizona is looking for is the same as what they got for Kuemper being a 1st and a decent prospect/young NHL player. A 1st and a 3rd isn't far off that, maybe add a smaller piece to it, but it's still close
      2 sept. 2021 à 16 h 59
      #49
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 1,965
      Mentions "j'aime": 601
      Quoting: Billy739
      Im a habs Fans and i think its pretty much on par
      KK has value dont get me wrong but he's no better a Center then Strome
      But Strome is a MUCH Superior Winger then KK by a country mile

      KK only gets a 1st and a 3rd on OS's
      Strome gets a 1st in most situations even if they are conditional
      I dont think anyone expected KK to get that offer , even i didnt
      But that said i wouldnt have been alright giving him up without an over pay

      I think if you can find a deal with TBL to bring Killorn on in a package for Strome that you could get that 1st and 3rd if not more
      They're in Cap hell and you offer them a Strome and the cap to re-sign him i think they'll happily pay
      Plus there's upside in having Killorn-Johnson back together to so its not like you're taking a cap dump just exploiting TBL cap situation


      Why would TB consider trading Killorn? They're going for 3 no chance the give up Killorn!!!!!
      4 sept. 2021 à 20 h 16
      #50
      Roster Architect
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2021
      Messages: 2,643
      Mentions "j'aime": 909
      Quoting: Bolts20Cup
      Dvorak


      Quoting: TrueCanuck
      Elliotte Friedman already reported that the cost that Arizona is looking for is the same as what they got for Kuemper being a 1st and a decent prospect/young NHL player. A 1st and a 3rd isn't far off that, maybe add a smaller piece to it, but it's still close


      Would you look at that? A 1st and a 2nd for Dvorak. Guess a 1st and a 3rd wasn't too far off 🤷🏻‍♂️
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Chargement de l'animation
      Soumettre les modifications du sondage