SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Whats The Plan Chris

Créé par: BSpadaro83
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 1 sept. 2021
Publié: 1 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not sure how they can go into opening night with 9.4m or so in cap space. Really need to take on some bad money for assets if they pass on Eichel.

And what to do with Zach Jones?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 041 469 $0 $8 400 000 $9 458 531 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 sept. 2021 à 14 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,916
Mentions "j'aime": 725
Look at all the expiring contracts in key positions... they absolutely should start the season with as much cap as possible. If a playoff run is looking likely, get some rentals if needed at the deadline. Right now, I really wouldn't do anything. Georgiev and Jones can be dealt at the deadline for picks/propects/rentals. It's best to start the year with them in case of injuries, etc. This is the first "full" year in two years, so I expect there to be some fatigue and whatnot, especially in goal
1 sept. 2021 à 14 h 54
#2
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
They do have a ton of potential performances bonuses...might not be the worst thing in the world to give the team a year of growth, see where they are at the deadline, and go from there.

Still have the potential to be a prettttty sneaky squad (albeit in a very tough division).

*Should* see guys like Miller, Kakko, Laffy (With a solid offseason I feel like he's going to breakout...jumped straight to the NHL after a covid lockdown from March-Dec, didn't play in the WJC, etc.), and Chytil take a solid step forward this year. Not a Rags fan, and definitely get a kick out of the "SO AND SO IS THE GREATEST PROSPECT EVER!" thing that was going on during the constant Eichel trades on here, but man, I definitely think they're a potential threat moving forward.
1 sept. 2021 à 15 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 1,848
Mentions "j'aime": 757
why eat up the bonus carry over on bad contracts when cap space will be important next season?
it's not like the Rangers need more prospects in the pool at this point?
NYR1983 a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2021 à 15 h 45
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,267
Mentions "j'aime": 2,534
Quoting: Mike_Gartner
why eat up the bonus carry over on bad contracts when cap space will be important next season?
it's not like the Rangers need more prospects in the pool at this point?


Unless Laf and Kakko have Hart type seasons we won’t have more than 1M in bonuses to pay out so it shouldn’t be a problem. However, save that cap space for TDL deals and not dead cap signings.
1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 13
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,736
Mentions "j'aime": 469
Quoting: NYR1983
Unless Laf and Kakko have Hart type seasons we won’t have more than 1M in bonuses to pay out so it shouldn’t be a problem. However, save that cap space for TDL deals and not dead cap signings.


I mean why not both... like 9.4m opening night cap space mean they would have an obscene amount of TDL cap space accrued, like 20 m or something. Their actual bonus liability is much less than it was last year, the odds of them having carryover is super low, and if they do, that means they had some awesome years from the young kids AND added a bunch of pieces. If they just do nothing and open the season with almost 9m in cap space, its a massive mistake. They should be taking on some bad expiring deals from teams that need to get under the cap if they dont add Eichel.
1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 15
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,736
Mentions "j'aime": 469
Quoting: Lenny7
They do have a ton of potential performances bonuses...might not be the worst thing in the world to give the team a year of growth, see where they are at the deadline, and go from there.

Still have the potential to be a prettttty sneaky squad (albeit in a very tough division).

*Should* see guys like Miller, Kakko, Laffy (With a solid offseason I feel like he's going to breakout...jumped straight to the NHL after a covid lockdown from March-Dec, didn't play in the WJC, etc.), and Chytil take a solid step forward this year. Not a Rags fan, and definitely get a kick out of the "SO AND SO IS THE GREATEST PROSPECT EVER!" thing that was going on during the constant Eichel trades on here, but man, I definitely think they're a potential threat moving forward.


you miss the point entirely. All those expiring deals that need to be re-signed are next years cap problem. The Rangers have ludicrous space this season and to do nothing with it, to not weaponize it all and just shrug and play out the year would be a massive missed opportunity on an expiring asset, in this case short term cap space.
1 sept. 2021 à 16 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,267
Mentions "j'aime": 2,534
Quoting: BSpadaro83
I mean why not both... like 9.4m opening night cap space mean they would have an obscene amount of TDL cap space accrued, like 20 m or something. Their actual bonus liability is much less than it was last year, the odds of them having carryover is super low, and if they do, that means they had some awesome years from the young kids AND added a bunch of pieces. If they just do nothing and open the season with almost 9m in cap space, its a massive mistake. They should be taking on some bad expiring deals from teams that need to get under the cap if they dont add Eichel.


Could do both but can’t go overboard with the deadweight at the beginning. I’d allow a potential 2M bonus, 3M for TDL(which will become like 9M), the rest could go towards dead cap contracts for compensation as long as it’s quality picks
1 sept. 2021 à 19 h 30
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: BSpadaro83
you miss the point entirely. All those expiring deals that need to be re-signed are next years cap problem. The Rangers have ludicrous space this season and to do nothing with it, to not weaponize it all and just shrug and play out the year would be a massive missed opportunity on an expiring asset, in this case short term cap space.


If they were to do what you suggest, it ties Drury hands to make deals during this season, if the need arises, so why do that? I agree spend the money IF IT MAKES THE TEAM BETTER, but to just take bad contracts to pick up some draft picks is not helpful if it limits what Drury can do THIS SEASON. What if they are doing well and in the playoff hunt and need cap space at the deadline? Better to have it instead of a few extra draft picks for future years. Cap flexibility is a GOOD thing.
Mike_Gartner a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2021 à 20 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 393
Mentions "j'aime": 46
From a not fan of the team, what would the temperature be on a trade of Kravtsov? Seems like your flush with RWers, what kind of return would seem reasonable? Or is he more or less an untouchable at this point?
2 sept. 2021 à 3 h 9
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 542
Mentions "j'aime": 170
1) Need cap space to cover bonuses so it doesn’t carry into next year when cap becomes much more important to us

2) Jones can get some time in the AHL, will be a good trade chip at the deadline or next offseason. Having a lot of talent on the blue line is a good thing
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage