SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is Monahan actually available

Créé par: BruinsFan35
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 27 août 2021
Publié: 27 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
BOS
  1. Monahan, Sean
Détails additionnels:
3rd balances out Moore, who needs to move due to Boston’s cap with Monahan. DeBrusk and a 2023 first for Monahan I think is fair
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Moore, John
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 579 841 $1 956 507 $182 500 $920 159 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 août 2021 à 7 h 25
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Not without a C going back to Flames I'd say.
27 août 2021 à 7 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Not unless Calgary is getting Eichel
Tkachinla et Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 9 h 38
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
This is a decent trade. Moore isnt a cap dump (or at least not a 3rd rounder lol) he has been injured the past 2 years
But its still a decent trade that the bruins may accept, maybe
27 août 2021 à 9 h 39
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Not unless Calgary is getting Eichel


Lmao again, with each comment you prove me more and more right.

you are probably the most biased flames fan i have ever seen
27 août 2021 à 9 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,665
Mentions "j'aime": 406
I feel it's if the Bruins accept.
27 août 2021 à 9 h 58
#6
Buljujarvi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,209
Mentions "j'aime": 2,552
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Not unless Calgary is getting Eichel


i respect you a lot but Monahan has not been playing like a 1C since 18-19. his WAR is around 63 percent. hes a solid 2C. but nowhere near Eichel level. this boston trade is fair price but it does nothing for the flames so they certainly decline.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 10 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 410
Mentions "j'aime": 138
As a Flames fan, I think the value is fair. The concern would be losing a #2C and not having a replacement ready. Backlund could move up, but then still a gap.
If this was next year and Zary or Pelltier were ready to move up, Id make this move.
Gmonwy et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 10 h 26
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Value seems right, but that leaves CGY with a hole at center. Have to think they only move Monahan if it means they're acquiring a guy like Eichel (to @Ledge_And_Dairy point)
Tkachinla et Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 10 h 54
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
i respect you a lot but Monahan has not been playing like a 1C since 18-19. his WAR is around 63 percent. hes a solid 2C. but nowhere near Eichel level. this boston trade is fair price but it does nothing for the flames so they certainly decline.


The point Ledge is making here is that CGY shouldn’t trade Monahan unless they are targeting a second trade that improves them at C. Nowhere on this site in the history of ever has anyone tried to say Monahan is on par with Eichel.

CGY should definitely be exploring options to upgrade over Monahan, and CGY has the assets to be a top bidder for Eichel. Monahan would have to move to make that deal work. Unfortunately, I think Treliving is also thinking that keeping Monahan and hoping he can play a full season without injury will improve his value — and he’d also be a decent 2C.

Flames fans want to see more change for the roster, however. And rightly so.
ConnorMcHellebucyk a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 11 h 8
#10
Buljujarvi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,209
Mentions "j'aime": 2,552
Quoting: Tkachinla
The point Ledge is making here is that CGY shouldn’t trade Monahan unless they are targeting a second trade that improves them at C. Nowhere on this site in the history of ever has anyone tried to say Monahan is on par with Eichel.

CGY should definitely be exploring options to upgrade over Monahan, and CGY has the assets to be a top bidder for Eichel. Monahan would have to move to make that deal work. Unfortunately, I think Treliving is also thinking that keeping Monahan and hoping he can play a full season without injury will improve his value — and he’d also be a decent 2C.

Flames fans want to see more change for the roster, however. And rightly so.


i think all these eichel trades have broken me to the point that i belived someone else i respect a lot thinks that eichel is on par with monahan lmao
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 11 h 42
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: LogicOnly
Lmao again, with each comment you prove me more and more right.

you are probably the most biased flames fan i have ever seen


Why? He’s correct. Unless they are making a play to get Eichel there is no way they trade Monahan. It creates a massive hole at C for them that they don’t have internal options to fix it.

Trading Monahan to Boston, or anyone, to free up cap space to go get Eichel makes sense. Trading him just to trade him does not.
27 août 2021 à 11 h 49
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: Gofnut999
Why? He’s correct. Unless they are making a play to get Eichel there is no way they trade Monahan. It creates a massive hole at C for them that they don’t have internal options to fix it.

Trading Monahan to Boston, or anyone, to free up cap space to go get Eichel makes sense. Trading him just to trade him does not.


Don't even bother with that clown. Seriously just do yourself a favor and add them to the ignore list. They act like they know everything and then get defensive when someone doesn't agree with them. Instead of defending there point they just try and insult people. Ironically enough they lack "logic" lol
Ledge_And_Dairy et vikhodush a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 16 h 32
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
i respect you a lot but Monahan has not been playing like a 1C since 18-19. his WAR is around 63 percent. hes a solid 2C. but nowhere near Eichel level. this boston trade is fair price but it does nothing for the flames so they certainly decline.


I never said Monahan returns Eichel, I said Monahan is not available ubless Calgary is getting Eichel
27 août 2021 à 16 h 32
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: LogicOnly
Lmao again, with each comment you prove me more and more right.

you are probably the most biased flames fan i have ever seen


?

What are you even talking about?
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 17 h 13
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: Gofnut999
Why? He’s correct. Unless they are making a play to get Eichel there is no way they trade Monahan. It creates a massive hole at C for them that they don’t have internal options to fix it.

Trading Monahan to Boston, or anyone, to free up cap space to go get Eichel makes sense. Trading him just to trade him does not.


Quoting: ON3M4N
Don't even bother with that clown. Seriously just do yourself a favor and add them to the ignore list. They act like they know everything and then get defensive when someone doesn't agree with them. Instead of defending there point they just try and insult people. Ironically enough they lack "logic" lol


Lmao
so why are yall making bruins acgms if he is only going to the sabres. whats the point, yall are wrong anyway then.
Point is this kid still is a clearly biased Flames fan

and again, as has been proven multiple times: I am the one that is pointing out that people can have their own opinions, I am the one that is being shat on for having Wagner on the 4th line, which is where I think he will play and is a good opinon, people can disagree, but if they are going to be rude and tell me im dumb beause I think a 4th liner should play on the 4th line, I will tell them to f off.

Dont join the ranks of the rude people on this website. Its not worth it.
27 août 2021 à 17 h 14
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
?

What are you even talking about?


god you shoul;d probably learn hockey before coming here lmaoooo
27 août 2021 à 17 h 18
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: LogicOnly
god you shoul;d probably learn hockey before coming here lmaoooo


Learn to think before you can start typing? I've said multiple times now, Flames have zero reason to trade Monahan to add a winger to their 3rd line.

You always talk about logic but never actually have any yourself. Tell me why Calgary should make this trade?
ON3M4N, Gofnut999, gretzkyghosts and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
27 août 2021 à 17 h 42
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,294
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
i think all these eichel trades have broken me to the point that i belived someone else i respect a lot thinks that eichel is on par with monahan lmao


I dont blame you there lol
27 août 2021 à 17 h 42
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Learn to think before you can start typing? I've said multiple times now, Flames have zero reason to trade Monahan to add a winger to their 3rd line.

You always talk about logic but never actually have any yourself. Tell me why Calgary should make this trade?


Does LogicOnly.....

A. Ask why your so defensive
B. Tell you to make an ACGM
3. Throw out a weak attempt at an insult

popcorn
27 août 2021 à 23 h 15
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: LogicOnly
Lmao
so why are yall making bruins acgms if he is only going to the sabres. whats the point, yall are wrong anyway then.
Point is this kid still is a clearly biased Flames fan

and again, as has been proven multiple times: I am the one that is pointing out that people can have their own opinions, I am the one that is being shat on for having Wagner on the 4th line, which is where I think he will play and is a good opinon, people can disagree, but if they are going to be rude and tell me im dumb beause I think a 4th liner should play on the 4th line, I will tell them to f off.

Dont join the ranks of the rude people on this website. Its not worth it.


Are you really that dense? Nobody is saying Monahan for Eichel. They are saying Flames are not in position to trade Monahan unless they going to bring in someone to replace him after they trade him, like Eichel…two separate trades. Jesus. SMH.

BTW, the only one being rude here is you. 🤷🏻‍♂️
gretzkyghosts, vikhodush et ON3M4N a aimé ceci.
28 août 2021 à 16 h 8
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: Gofnut999
Are you really that dense? Nobody is saying Monahan for Eichel. They are saying Flames are not in position to trade Monahan unless they going to bring in someone to replace him after they trade him, like Eichel…two separate trades. Jesus. SMH.

BTW, the only one being rude here is you. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Well thsts clearly not true
9 sept. 2021 à 16 h 25
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: Gofnut999
Are you really that dense? Nobody is saying Monahan for Eichel. They are saying Flames are not in position to trade Monahan unless they going to bring in someone to replace him after they trade him, like Eichel…two separate trades. Jesus. SMH.

BTW, the only one being rude here is you. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Facts lol. I don't think I've ever seen someone get so defensive over the suggestion of a 4th liner....its actually mind blowing to me.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage