SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks Draft Team

Créé par: Juiceman
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 20 août 2021
Publié: 20 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I guess we don’t draft RD

Also 2017 was pretty succesful
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
37 750 000 $
37 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $55 910 618 $648 780 $2 180 000 $25 589 382 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
783 333 $783 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
874 125 $874 125 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
846 667 $846 667 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 666 667 $2 666 667 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
860 833 $860 833 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
886 667 $886 667 $
AD
RFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 août 2021 à 13 h 5
#1
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
The only thing Benning is good at is drafting.
20 août 2021 à 14 h 6
#2
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,917
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
This really goes to show how bad the drafting was pre-Benning. Edler, Horvat, hutton are the only non Benning players.

There are plenty of Gillis picks out there aged 27-32 that are no where near the NHL. Brutal
Juiceman a aimé ceci.
20 août 2021 à 14 h 35
#3
Démarrer sujet
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: The_Rocket
This really goes to show how bad the drafting was pre-Benning. Edler, Horvat, hutton are the only non Benning players.

There are plenty of Gillis picks out there aged 27-32 that are no where near the NHL. Brutal


To be fair, we were contenders during that time but yeah, drafting good players wasn’t a thing from the Gillis era
20 août 2021 à 15 h 16
#4
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,917
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: Juiceman
To be fair, we were contenders during that time but yeah, drafting good players wasn’t a thing from the Gillis era


Still though. Look at 2010. Gillis had the option to keep his 1st round pick that year and trade away his 2011 first rounder instead (to Florida as per of the Keith balled trade). He had already traded away the 2010 2nd and the 2010 3rd. He decided to trade the 2010 pick anyways. Florida selected Howden with it, but kuznetsov, coyle, and Brock Nelson we’re all still on the board and they all went in the 5 spots after the Canucks original pick. The player the Canucks were targeting that dead in the first round was JARED TINORDI! They confirmed the trade to Florida after tinordi was picked at 22

Since he traded it away, the Canucks didn’t pick until the 4th round. Complete waste of a draft when so much talent was still on the board. Part of the trade to Florida included Michael Grabner who was a top prospect at the time. So he traded away a top prospect and then took a mulligan on the draft… an people wonder why the cupboards were so bare when he left.
Juiceman a aimé ceci.
20 août 2021 à 15 h 18
#5
Démarrer sujet
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: The_Rocket
Still though. Look at 2010. Gillis had the option to keep his 1st round pick that year and trade away his 2011 first rounder instead (to Florida as per of the Keith balled trade). He had already traded away the 2010 2nd and the 2010 3rd. He decided to trade the 2010 pick anyways. Florida selected Howden with it, but kuznetsov, coyle, and Brock Nelson we’re all still on the board and they all went in the 5 spots after the Canucks original pick. The player the Canucks were targeting that dead in the first round was JARED TINORDI! They confirmed the trade to Florida after tinordi was picked at 22

Since he traded it away, the Canucks didn’t pick until the 4th round. Complete waste of a draft when so much talent was still on the board. Part of the trade to Florida included Michael Grabner who was a top prospect at the time. So he traded away a top prospect and then took a mulligan on the draft… an people wonder why the cupboards were so bare when he left.


At least he left us with our captain?

I wasn’t really super into drafting signings and whatnot. Back then I just enjoyed watching the Canucks dominate
The_Rocket a aimé ceci.
20 août 2021 à 15 h 21
#6
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,917
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: Juiceman
At least he left us with our captain?

I wasn’t really super into drafting signings and whatnot. Back then I just enjoyed watching the Canucks dominate


Yeah me as well. I didn’t pay attention to prospects at all. Looking back on it though, Gillis made some incredibly short sighted moves and didn’t have the prospect system to back it up.
Juiceman a aimé ceci.
20 août 2021 à 17 h 4
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: Juiceman
The only thing Benning is good at is drafting.


he isn't bad at signing RFAs ether
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage