SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

need someone who can play defense on the left side

Créé par: kingkanuck
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 20 août 2021
Publié: 20 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If neither OEL or QH can play defense who will defend the left side?
OEL has a no-movement clause so is untouchable. This trade saves the Canucks approximately $3.5M and gives them a quality Dman plus 2 good prospects and a first round pick.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
810 500 000 $
Transactions
VAN
  1. Carlsson, Gabriel
  2. Gavrikov, Vladislav
  3. Marchenko, Kirill [Liste de réserve]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
CBJ
  1. Hughes, Quinn [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 060 659 $648 780 $3 400 000 $4 439 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 août 2021 à 11 h 55
#1
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,928
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
I really like Gavrikov but I wouldn’t move Hughes for him.

Offensive defensemen are a much rarer breed than defensive defensemen.
20 août 2021 à 11 h 57
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,880
Mentions "j'aime": 6,386
Can we stop with this garbage
sedin33 et PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
20 août 2021 à 12 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 234
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Columbus would be getting a steal with this but I don’t think it would work out in the long run.
1.) He’s a LHD when we need a RHD.
2.) There’s no guarantees that he would stick around long term.
20 août 2021 à 13 h 4
#4
Démarrer sujet
AN "ORIGINAL SIX"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 1,742
Mentions "j'aime": 182
Quoting: The_Rocket
I really like Gavrikov but I wouldn’t move Hughes for him.

Offensive defensemen are a much rarer breed than defensive defensemen.


And how many small offensive Dmen do the Lightning have? None because you can't win the cup with them. Hedman is their most offensive Dman and he ain't exactly small. Dmen should help keep the puck out of the net and the Canucks don't have enough players doing that.
20 août 2021 à 13 h 59
#5
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,928
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: kingkanuck
And how many small offensive Dmen do the Lightning have? None because you can't win the cup with them. Hedman is their most offensive Dman and he ain't exactly small. Dmen should help keep the puck out of the net and the Canucks don't have enough players doing that.


Size has nothing to do with offence. And looking at one teams blue line does not mean that small defensemen are bad. Girad In Colorado, Ellis in Nashville, Matt dumba/Jared spurgeon in Minnesota, Tory Krug/Matt Gryzlyk in boston, etc.

There are plenty of examples of teams with great blue lines where a smaller player is on their top pair. Hughes’s offensive abilities more than offset his size.

If your goal is to import everything the defense on the blue line, you should be looking to dump Myers, not hughes
20 août 2021 à 14 h 23
#6
Démarrer sujet
AN "ORIGINAL SIX"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 1,742
Mentions "j'aime": 182
Quoting: The_Rocket
Size has nothing to do with offence. And looking at one teams blue line does not mean that small defensemen are bad. Girad In Colorado, Ellis in Nashville, Matt dumba/Jared spurgeon in Minnesota, Tory Krug/Matt Gryzlyk in boston, etc.

There are plenty of examples of teams with great blue lines where a smaller player is on their top pair. Hughes’s offensive abilities more than offset his size.

If your goal is to import everything the defense on the blue line, you should be looking to dump Myers, not hughes



And how many Stanley cups have those players won? Krug played 2 games as a rookie in 2011. Myers was -8 last year, Hughes was -24. That doesn't look like his offensive prowess offset his defensive shortcomings.
20 août 2021 à 15 h 2
#7
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,928
Mentions "j'aime": 3,575
Quoting: kingkanuck
And how many Stanley cups have those players won? Krug played 2 games as a rookie in 2011. Myers was -8 last year, Hughes was -24. That doesn't look like his offensive prowess offset his defensive shortcomings.


Boston went to the finals in 2019, Nashville in 2016. Too early to say for Colorado. Minnesota never put together a good enough forward group to compete, but that doesn’t mean their d-core was bad. Clearly, you can build a contender with small defenseman in big roles, provided they are good defensemen.

Hughes is 10 years younger than Myers. Myers was far more permissive 5 on 5 than Hughes was. Hughes heavily outproduced Myers. The choice should be obvious which one to dump
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage