SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kaprivoz

Créé par: Jacob_blackhawks
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 août 2021
Publié: 17 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
69 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Kaprizov, Kirill [Droits de RFA]
MIN
  1. Kubalik, Dominik
  2. Reichel, Lukas
  3. Strome, Dylan
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
2.
OTT
  1. De Haan, Calvin
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $71 541 672 $452 439 $4 232 500 $9 958 328 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 août 2021 à 20 h 48
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
I think we'll just keep Kaprivoz over that offer. If he was willing to sign that contract he'd be signed by now.
JackAce91 a aimé ceci.
17 août 2021 à 20 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 600
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: Caerii
I think we'll just keep Kaprivoz over that offer. If he was willing to sign that contract he'd be signed by now.


That's what I was thinking. The offer would have to be over 10 mil for Minnesota to even consider not matching, because Kaprisov would sign that.
17 août 2021 à 20 h 56
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,294
Mentions "j'aime": 1,325
Honestly think this deal makes Chicago worse in long run
17 août 2021 à 21 h 38
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 76
Wild aren't trading kaprizov especially to division rival like ever. Not especially for a bunch of crap like Dylan strome.
17 août 2021 à 21 h 55
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 76
Quoting: JackAce91
That's what I was thinking. The offer would have to be over 10 mil for Minnesota to even consider not matching, because Kaprisov would sign that.


By the way kaprizov isn't eligible for an offer sheet
17 août 2021 à 22 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: Amakoue
Wild aren't trading kaprizov especially to division rival like ever. Not especially for a bunch of crap like Dylan strome.


That is a great offer for Kaprizov who may not even sign with the Wild. Im not sure what crap your seeing there but thats a big pay from CHI and one I wouldn't do tbh.
18 août 2021 à 0 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,899
Mentions "j'aime": 1,239
There's nothing wrong with the value, but I just don't want to trade Kirill to a division rival where he'd play against us every other night.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
18 août 2021 à 10 h 49
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 76
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
That is a great offer for Kaprizov who may not even sign with the Wild. Im not sure what crap your seeing there but thats a big pay from CHI and one I wouldn't do tbh.


Well wild aren't trading kaprizov. what you said is just blatantly false. But hey you aren't in Minnesota and don't know the facts
18 août 2021 à 13 h 29
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,457
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
If it was possible to sign Kaprizov for 9 M$, the Wild would just sign him but this is a pretty good offer

Lukas Reichel : excellent prospect (probably Chicago's best)

Kubalik : excellent player, not even 2 years older than Kaprizov

Strome : common he's not crap, he's only 24 y/o and has proven he can produce

1st + 2nd + 3rd : a trio of picks that has pretty good value
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
18 août 2021 à 13 h 31
#10
In Zito We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 1,596
Chicago should not do this at all
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
18 août 2021 à 13 h 46
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
Quoting: Xspyrit
If it was possible to sign Kaprizov for 9 M$, the Wild would just sign him but this is a pretty good offer

Lukas Reichel : excellent prospect (probably Chicago's best)

Kubalik : excellent player, not even 2 years older than Kaprizov

Strome : common he's not crap, he's only 24 y/o and has proven he can produce

1st + 2nd + 3rd : a trio of picks that has pretty good value



I think we're throwing the word excellent around a little liberally.
18 août 2021 à 13 h 49
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,457
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
Quoting: Caerii
I think we're throwing the word excellent around a little liberally.


Excellent was used twice in that post (semantics, could have used another term), so where was it NOT deserved?

Reichel as a prospect?
Kubalik as a player?
18 août 2021 à 13 h 55
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
Quoting: Xspyrit
Excellent was used twice in that post (semantics, could have used another term), so where was it NOT deserved?

Reichel as a prospect?
Kubalik as a player?


I mean, yeah, what do you mean by excellent? What is it in relation to?

Kubalik is a good top six/top line winger. He's not an all star caliber player.

Richel is a good prospect, I like him a lot, he's one of the two players I wanted the Wild to move back into the first round to take, but he's not an elite blue chip kind of guy. He's not projected to turn into a Patrick Kane level guy. He should be a good middle six to top six forward when all is said and done. Probably not too far off Kubalik one way or the other if he reaches his potential. He may be Chicago's best prospect, but most other teams have at least one better prospect than him, some have a few.
18 août 2021 à 14 h 26
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,457
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
Modifié 18 août 2021 à 14 h 34. Raison: Delete please
double post
18 août 2021 à 14 h 26
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,457
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
Modifié 18 août 2021 à 14 h 33
Quoting: Caerii
I mean, yeah, what do you mean by excellent? What is it in relation to?

Kubalik is a good top six/top line winger. He's not an all star caliber player.

Richel is a good prospect, I like him a lot, he's one of the two players I wanted the Wild to move back into the first round to take, but he's not an elite blue chip kind of guy. He's not projected to turn into a Patrick Kane level guy. He should be a good middle six to top six forward when all is said and done. Probably not too far off Kubalik one way or the other if he reaches his potential. He may be Chicago's best prospect, but most other teams have at least one better prospect than him, some have a few.


Well, it obviously depends on everyone's semantics

I have generationnal players for guys like McDavid and Crosby

I have elite players for guys like Huberdeau, Brad Marchand, etc

Then I have high end, then excellent/very good, then good, then average, then below average, then barely NHL level I guess.

By the way, Patrick Kane is more generational than "excellent". He's probably the best USA born player ever. Of course, it depends if your standards are realistic or not.

Agreed some teams have better prospects, some have several but to me he's an excellent prospect. Not blue chip, not high end but not just "good" either
18 août 2021 à 18 h 48
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: Amakoue
Well wild aren't trading kaprizov. what you said is just blatantly false. But hey you aren't in Minnesota and don't know the facts


I don't think they should be trading Kaprizov either though what I said wasn't false, its a difference of opinion to yours clearly. I am not in Minnesota, I don't know the full situation with Kaprizov though I do feel CHI would be making a huge mistake if they made this deal.
18 août 2021 à 23 h 16
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 600
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: Amakoue
By the way kaprizov isn't eligible for an offer sheet


Didn't actually check first before commenting, you're right.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage