SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Alberta - Hello

Créé par: jimmmyg
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 6 août 2021
Publié: 6 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This should go over well
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 200 000 $
Transactions
PIT
  1. Dubé, Dillon [Droits de RFA]
  2. Tkachuk, Matthew
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Guentzel, Jake
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de CGY
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 378 206 $0 $0 $121 794 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 725 000 $1 725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 août 2021 à 14 h 16
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Cherry pick city! Go read thru again and do some research outside of looking at point totals


lmao again. You aren't backing up anything you say. Do me this at least. Show me where I said Guentzel is better
6 août 2021 à 14 h 18
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
lmao again. You aren't backing up anything you say. Do me this at least. Show me where I said Guentzel is better


“Not to mention the Tkachuk and Guentzel comparison. You are truly clueless”

This is where you say something like - “I didn’t say Guentzel was better”.
6 août 2021 à 14 h 21
#28
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
“Not to mention the Tkachuk and Guentzel comparison. You are truly clueless”

This is where you say something like - “I didn’t say Guentzel was better”.


lmao you can not be this dense, right? Your original comment was "Tkachuk >>>> Guentzel" Meaning Tkachuk is far and away better, which is not the case at all. A more realistic one is Tkachuk >>>> Zucker. Again, show me where I said Guentzel is better. Im still waiting
6 août 2021 à 14 h 24
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
lmao you can not be this dense, right? Your original comment was "Tkachuk >>>> Guentzel" Meaning Tkachuk is far and away better, which is not the case at all. A more realistic one is Tkachuk >>>> Zucker. Again, show me where I said Guentzel is better. Im still waiting


Sorry you got triggered by my over usage of >. Didn’t realize you were such a stickler! I’ll limit how many > are used going forward. Thank you for your service
6 août 2021 à 14 h 26
#30
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Sorry you got triggered by my over usage of >. Didn’t realize you were such a stickler! I’ll limit how many > are used going forward. Thank you for your service


Who is triggered lmao? You realize on this site, the more ">" you use, the more it means, right? lmao. Btw, im still waiting on you to show me where I said Guentzel is better
6 août 2021 à 14 h 27
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Who is triggered lmao? You realize on this site, the more ">" you use, the more it means, right? lmao. Btw, im still waiting on you to show me where I said Guentzel is better


Clearly you are. Go do the research on their underlying metrics with isolated impacts like I said earlier. Otherwise, keep waiting. Either way, don’t really care.
6 août 2021 à 14 h 29
#32
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Clearly you are. Go do the research on their underlying metrics with isolated impacts like I said earlier. Otherwise, keep waiting. Either way, don’t really care.


Ill look those up as soon as Tkuchuk has a 40 goal season like Guentzel, deal?
6 août 2021 à 14 h 32
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Ill look those up as soon as Tkuchuk has a 40 goal season like Guentzel, deal?


Whatever makes you happy
6 août 2021 à 14 h 36
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Making you look stupid made me happy lmao


Get in your basement troll
6 août 2021 à 14 h 37
#35
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Get in your basement troll


Yup I’m the troll lol. Meanwhile you have not backed up any single thing you have said.
6 août 2021 à 14 h 38
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Yup I’m the troll lol. Meanwhile you have not backed up any single thing you have said.


Sure
6 août 2021 à 14 h 40
#37
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Sure


Im still waiting on you to show me where I said Guentzel is better.
6 août 2021 à 14 h 44
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Im still waiting on you to show me where I said Guentzel is better.


Already did. You can’t help yourself.
6 août 2021 à 14 h 46
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 175
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
lol so if its so easy to score 40 playing with Crosby, how's come nobody else has done it other than Guentzel?


James Neal put up 40 and Kunitz put up 35. Id still take Guentzel over both Neal and Kunitz but he doesnt get close to 40 without Crosby. Wether you like it or not Tkachuk definitely has more value around the league than Guentzel does.
vikhodush a aimé ceci.
6 août 2021 à 14 h 47
#40
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Already did. You can’t help yourself.


Nope. You tried, and I explained what multiple ">" meant. So try again. Where did I say Guentzel is better? Plus, I could think tkachuk = Guentzel. I never said what "Not to mention the Tkachuk and Guentzel comparison. You are truly clueless" meant lol. You look stupid making assumptions
6 août 2021 à 14 h 48
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Nope. You tried, and I explained what multiple ">" meant. So try again. Where did I say Guentzel is better? Plus, I could think tkachuk = Guentzel. I never said what "Not to mention the Tkachuk and Guentzel comparison. You are truly clueless" meant lol. You look stupid making assumptions


Twisting your own words - yes someone on here looks very stupid. Go look in the mirror pal, it’s you!
6 août 2021 à 14 h 49
#42
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: TheLamb9
James Neal put up 40 and Kunitz put up 35. Id still take Guentzel over both Neal and Kunitz but he doesnt get close to 40 without Crosby. Wether you like it or not Tkachuk definitely has more value around the league than Guentzel does.


He can have more value. Im not denying that. My point was they are in the same tier
6 août 2021 à 14 h 50
#43
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Twisting your own words - yes someone on here looks very stupid. Go look in the mirror pal, it’s you!

lol exactly how am I twisting my words? Because I said your comparison on the 2 isn't good, and you immediate thought was I said Guentzel is better? You are reachinggggggg
6 août 2021 à 14 h 52
#44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
lol exactly how am I twisting my words? Because I said your comparison on the 2 isn't good, and you immediate thought was I said Guentzel is better? You are reachinggggggg


Nah you’re trolling. And you’re biased smile
6 août 2021 à 14 h 53
#45
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Nah you’re trolling. And you’re biased smile


Thats cool. You still haven't backed up anything you have said, and made assumptions that you can not show me squinting with tongue out
6 août 2021 à 14 h 53
#46
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Thats cool. You still haven't backed up anything you have said, and made assumptions that you can not show me squinting with tongue out


Go do your own research pal!
6 août 2021 à 14 h 55
#47
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
Go do your own research pal!


Whats funny is I did, and you called me biased because it went against your opinion lmao. Look how dumb you look "go do your own research, but make sure it fits my opinion or else you are biased"
6 août 2021 à 14 h 56
#48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Whats funny is I did, and you called me biased because it went against your opinion lmao. Look how dumb you look "go do your own research, but make sure it fits my opinion or else you are biased"


No you didn’t
6 août 2021 à 14 h 56
#49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Whats funny is I did, and you called me biased because it went against your opinion lmao. Look how dumb you look "go do your own research, but make sure it fits my opinion or else you are biased"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Oh no I’m in for it now
6 août 2021 à 14 h 57
#50
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: vikhodush
No you didn’t


lmao what? I brought up point production, and you dismissed it tears of joy you are a different type of stupid
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage