SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Version 22 Hughes Trade

Créé par: CptMuffin
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 3 août 2021
Publié: 3 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Does anyone actually see Hughes playing out his career in Vancouver? Make the trade now before the market can turn on him and make him Bure in 1998.

Also, I really like Petterson. I think he'll eventually be able to justify being one of the highest paid players in the league. I do not think he's there yet. 2 years @ $8 mill I feel is very fair value for where he is at right now and if he grows like he looks like he should over the 2 years, sure give him that Auston Matthews money over 8 years. 8 year $92 million deal no problem. But not yet.

Remember, its all BS and not likely to happen anyways.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
43 000 000 $
2750 000 $
28 000 000 $
Transactions
VAN
  1. Smith, Ty
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
New Jersey fans will say "TOO MUCH!" Also, New Jersey is starting to look pretty stacked.
NJD
  1. Hughes, Quinn [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Canucks fans will say "NOT ENOUGH!" I think this is more than fair value. I love Quinn in Vancouver but I truly don't believe he's a long term fit here.
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 073 992 $648 780 $2 950 000 $8 426 008 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 août 2021 à 13 h 9
#1
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Hughes is fine where he is. Let him develop a few more years and if we really need to trade him, we can get a much bigger package for him.
3 août 2021 à 13 h 10
#2
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,872
Mentions "j'aime": 4,248
TOO MUCH!
CptMuffin, Devil et Book_Hockey a aimé ceci.
3 août 2021 à 13 h 10
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 123
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Juiceman
Hughes is fine where he is. Let him develop a few more years and if we really need to trade him, we can get a much bigger package for him.


Ty Smith is preeety good. Not Hughes good. But still preeety good.
3 août 2021 à 13 h 13
#4
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: CptMuffin
Ty Smith is preeety good. Not Hughes good. But still preeety good.


Still, Hughes can demand a lot more than “pretty good” once he’s developed his defensive game and has become elite two ways…
3 août 2021 à 13 h 13
#5
Classic Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 99
Mentions "j'aime": 31
I don't think the value is bad, but I also don't think the Devils do this. Smith could become as good as Hughes, and the Devils may well suck next year (especially if we don't add more forwards) and can't afford to be giving up that pick.
Devil, Opie et Book_Hockey a aimé ceci.
3 août 2021 à 13 h 17
#6
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,935
Mentions "j'aime": 26,436
Devils decline. Value isn't terrible but Ty Smith could end up being close to Quinn Hughes. Smith is already better defensively than Quinn, but not as good offensively. Adding a 2022 first which will likely be a lottery pick makes it even worse for the Devils
Opie et Book_Hockey a aimé ceci.
3 août 2021 à 13 h 46
#7
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: Devil1122
Devils decline. Value isn't terrible but Ty Smith could end up being close to Quinn Hughes. Smith is already better defensively than Quinn, but not as good offensively. Adding a 2022 first which will likely be a lottery pick makes it even worse for the Devils


I'd prefer Smith ... I wouldn't be surprised is he proved to be equal, if not a better two way player, than Hughes long term. Only time will tell.

The 22 first is gold. Cant let that go.
Devil a aimé ceci.
3 août 2021 à 13 h 51
#8
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 785
Mentions "j'aime": 181
I actually really like Smith and I wouldn't be interested in moving him for Hughes. Mostly because with Hamilton here as NJ's #1 defenseman, I think Smith is a terrific #2 going forward. Whereas Hughes is a #1 and will be paid like one which could be really tough for the Devils. Basically it comes down to I prefer Smith @5x5 over Hughes@ 7x9 or something.

All that said from a realistic standpoint I think that trade value is fair. I just don't think it's realistic. Both teams would probably prefer to keep their homegrown talent. Only way I really see Q. Hughes to NJ is if he specifically requests to leave Vancouver and play with his brothers. Which if it happened would more likely be a couple years down the road. And if that is the case and NJ has all of the leverage his value will be way down to a point where Smith is not going to be involved. I don't see it happening anyways, more likely he signs a long extension with Vancouver and maybe goes to NJ when he gets to UFA.
Book_Hockey et Devil a aimé ceci.
3 août 2021 à 14 h 35
#9
AN "ORIGINAL SIX"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 1,742
Mentions "j'aime": 182
I don't think Hughes or Boeser will play out their careers in Vancouver.
Boldirev et CptMuffin a aimé ceci.
3 août 2021 à 14 h 46
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 604
Mentions "j'aime": 200
I doubt Hughes gets past his bridge deal in Vancouver. If the Devils want a Hughes trio they will have to pay the piper and it will be more than this. The next GM will want to hit a home run if/when the time comes.
CptMuffin a aimé ceci.
3 août 2021 à 16 h 12
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 966
Mentions "j'aime": 335
Quoting: Juiceman
Hughes is fine where he is. Let him develop a few more years and if we really need to trade him, we can get a much bigger package for him.


I think this needs to happen for both guys, both are young, un-developed with teams who have differing views on their respective ceilings. it's way to soon to trade either of them, GM's won't do it either as either player could pop off and make the trade look ridiculous.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage