SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fiala post arbitration trade options

Créé par: BoredWildFan
Équipe: 2021-22 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 29 juill. 2021
Publié: 2 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Wild filed for arbitration. Fiala has the choice of a 1 or 2 year contract. I assume he chooses 2 years which will take him to UFA status. I think a trade would be inevitable.
Looking at trade options, I looked for teams that would be trying to win now and took back useful players those teams are looking to trade.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
47 750 000 $
26 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Bolduc, Zachary [Liste de réserve]
  2. Tarasenko, Vladimir
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (STL)
2.
MIN
  1. Desnoyers, Elliot
  2. van Riemsdyk, James
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PHI)
PHI
    Fiala
    3.
    MIN
    1. Lemieux, Brendan
    2. Määttä, Olli
    3. Vilardi, Gabriel
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
    Détails additionnels:
    Pick is lottery protected.
    LAK
      Fiala.
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2022
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de STL
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de LAK
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de MIN
      2023
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      2024
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2181 500 000 $80 344 313 $0 $732 500 $1 155 687 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blues de St-Louis
      3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
      AD
      NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      C
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      725 000 $725 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      900 000 $900 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      725 000 $725 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      850 000 $850 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      DD
      RFA - 2
      Équipe de réserve
      Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
      894 167 $894 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AD, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
      1 550 000 $1 550 000 $ (425 000 $$425K425 000 $$425K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
      3 333 225 $3 333 225 $ (2 208 225 $$2M2 208 225 $$2M)
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $ (5 875 000 $$6M5 875 000 $$6M)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      845 833 $845 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      C, AG
      RFA - 4

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      2 août 2021 à 21 h 3
      #1
      Patient gm
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 1,864
      Mentions "j'aime": 992
      Yii ok I will get roasted for the fiala value. I love him but that’s overvaluing him
      jnowariak et Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
      2 août 2021 à 21 h 9
      #2
      mokumboi
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 29,013
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,241
      Blues pass. Maybe with Tank and the pick, but Bolduc makes it too much.
      BluesNation a aimé ceci.
      2 août 2021 à 21 h 13
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 14,506
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,125
      I wouldn't trade Vilardi for Fiala 1-for-1.
      Manoftheworld11 a aimé ceci.
      2 août 2021 à 21 h 28
      #4
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2016
      Messages: 263
      Mentions "j'aime": 92
      Quoting: mokumboi
      Blues pass. Maybe with Tank and the pick, but Bolduc makes it too much.


      That’s fair. In my original draft I had Vlad, Bolduc and a possible conditional pick based on players’ production. Decided to go with the 1st because Vlad’s value seems to be minuscule and the 1st would be late in the round.
      2 août 2021 à 21 h 33
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2016
      Messages: 263
      Mentions "j'aime": 92
      Quoting: tkecanuck341
      I wouldn't trade Vilardi for Fiala 1-for-1.


      Nor would I. That’s why I added a guy who was rumored as a possible buyout candidate and an easily replaced fourth line grinder. With the addition of Danault to their lineup, the Kings can afford to move Vilardi. If the additional 1st seems rich, so be it.
      2 août 2021 à 21 h 40
      #6
      mokumboi
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 29,013
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,241
      Quoting: BoredWildFan
      That’s fair. In my original draft I had Vlad, Bolduc and a possible conditional pick based on players’ production. Decided to go with the 1st because Vlad’s value seems to be minuscule and the 1st would be late in the round.


      There's a fair chance Tarasenko is being undervalued, which will become apparent if he starts the season scoring and the price shoots up.
      2 août 2021 à 21 h 52
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 14,506
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,125
      Quoting: BoredWildFan
      Nor would I. That’s why I added a guy who was rumored as a possible buyout candidate and an easily replaced fourth line grinder. With the addition of Danault to their lineup, the Kings can afford to move Vilardi. If the additional 1st seems rich, so be it.


      Minnesota adds in a Fiala for Vilardi swap, not LA.
      2 août 2021 à 21 h 57
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 3,892
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
      Quoting: Lightman13
      Yii ok I will get roasted for the fiala value. I love him but that’s overvaluing him


      There’s no need for the NHL guys unless they need cap going the other way. I would say that Carolina and NJ seem to make sense. Anaheim too.
      vikhodush a aimé ceci.
      2 août 2021 à 22 h 26
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 6,694
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
      CAR would be interested at right price
      ecupirate07 a aimé ceci.
      2 août 2021 à 22 h 34
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2020
      Messages: 9,211
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,956
      Quoting: vikhodush
      CAR would be interested at right price


      Yep this. Canes have a few roster ready prospects that can help with the cap issues over the next 3 seasons. Cotton, Bokk, Suzuki, etc.
      vikhodush et Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
      2 août 2021 à 23 h 13
      #11
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2021
      Messages: 509
      Mentions "j'aime": 76
      Quoting: tkecanuck341
      Minnesota adds in a Fiala for Vilardi swap, not LA.


      Laughable. People overvaluing prospects which isn't even top prospect on kings. Fiala has better value
      2 août 2021 à 23 h 16
      #12
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2021
      Messages: 509
      Mentions "j'aime": 76
      Quoting: BoredWildFan
      That’s fair. In my original draft I had Vlad, Bolduc and a possible conditional pick based on players’ production. Decided to go with the 1st because Vlad’s value seems to be minuscule and the 1st would be late in the round.


      So wild take on worser players, contract and players in James R, and Vladimir R? Especially with wild r. Also kings proposal is bad
      3 août 2021 à 0 h 0
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 14,506
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,125
      Quoting: Amakoue
      Laughable. People overvaluing prospects which isn't even top prospect on kings. Fiala has better value


      If Fiala was 4 years younger and not guaranteed to become a UFA in 2 seasons, then maybe. Vilardi is the third best prospect on the team with the unanimously best ranked prospect pool in the league. He would immediately become the best prospect on over half the teams in the league. He's still on his ELC and is rights restricted for at least another 5 years. I'm not saying that Vilardi is currently a better player than Fiala (although he's not that far behind), but his age and contract situation makes him more valuable.
      Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
      3 août 2021 à 0 h 5
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,118
      Mentions "j'aime": 459
      Quoting: Lightman13
      Yii ok I will get roasted for the fiala value. I love him but that’s overvaluing him


      I mean yeah. Wow. That's really over valuing him. Maybe more like

      Tarasenko
      1st

      Van Riemsdyk
      No kicker or a 2nd for a 3rd kind of thing

      Maata
      Vilardi
      3 août 2021 à 0 h 6
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,118
      Mentions "j'aime": 459
      Quoting: ecupirate07
      Yep this. Canes have a few roster ready prospects that can help with the cap issues over the next 3 seasons. Cotton, Bokk, Suzuki, etc.


      I like the Canes as a trading partner for Fiala
      3 août 2021 à 0 h 7
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,118
      Mentions "j'aime": 459
      Quoting: tkecanuck341
      I wouldn't trade Vilardi for Fiala 1-for-1.


      Wow, I've been high on Vilardi for awhile. I'm glad to see my faith is not misplaced! I really like the guy.
      Manoftheworld11 a aimé ceci.
      3 août 2021 à 0 h 59
      #17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2021
      Messages: 455
      Mentions "j'aime": 89
      If the Kings are trading Vilardi it's for a top LD, not Fiala, and not by adding a 1st round pick to it.
      3 août 2021 à 3 h 52
      #18
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 8,208
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
      Fiala has about the same value as Reinhart. I'm thinking it'll be a disappointing return for him.

      I know arbitration rarely goes all the way to a hearing, but I don't have a warm and fuzzy about this one being resolved. Strange move by MN since Fiala gets to pick the term (gotta be 2 years) and it'll lead him straight into UFA.
      Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
      3 août 2021 à 9 h 30
      #19
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,118
      Mentions "j'aime": 459
      Quoting: wabit
      Fiala has about the same value as Reinhart. I'm thinking it'll be a disappointing return for him.

      I know arbitration rarely goes all the way to a hearing, but I don't have a warm and fuzzy about this one being resolved. Strange move by MN since Fiala gets to pick the term (gotta be 2 years) and it'll lead him straight into UFA.


      Sounds like Guerin isn't as high on Fiala as Fiala is on Fiala. Of course it helps our cap situation to not sign Fiala to a long term contract
      3 août 2021 à 10 h 41
      #20
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 8,208
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
      Quoting: Wildwinswhen
      Sounds like Guerin isn't as high on Fiala as Fiala is on Fiala. Of course it helps our cap situation to not sign Fiala to a long term contract


      I dunno. There doesn't seem to be much middle ground with GMBG. He either likes you or he doesn't and nothing else matters: skill, fit, team needs, etc.
      Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
      3 août 2021 à 11 h 25
      #21
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 1,118
      Mentions "j'aime": 459
      Quoting: wabit
      I dunno. There doesn't seem to be much middle ground with GMBG. He either likes you or he doesn't and nothing else matters: skill, fit, team needs, etc.


      Yeah, and we'll see if that approach translates to wins 😬
      3 août 2021 à 11 h 43
      #22
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2016
      Messages: 8,208
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
      Quoting: Wildwinswhen
      Yeah, and we'll see if that approach translates to wins 😬


      Or how long it will keep him in a job.
      Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage