Why is it a sign and trade? They are all under contract.

My bad I mean Hertl sign an extension prior to the trade so he isn’t a rental

If he's not a rental SJ will require full value and that's short of it.

Lazar over Wagner

I do think Lazar is better than Wagner but Wagner have been there longer so I doubt he gets scratch for Lazar (unless he plays bad)

Lazar is better defensively and at faceoffs, that should be it

Hertl is one of those guys that seems to be perceived as something other than what he is.

He’s cracked 50 points….ONCE. He’s a nice player, and he had that one outlier season where he had 70 points and 30 goals, but outside of that his averages are in the 30s.

BCarlo25 still trying to pretend Hertl is a 30 point player.

SJ very easily declines, nowhere near enough value for Hertl.

Perhaps you should re-read my post. I don’t think you understood it.

What i said was objectively factual. There is no other way to interpret it, unless you are incapable of doing simple math.

I've already had to do this a million times with you, but your lying through omission is getting old.

So what happened to your old account?

What
Nowhere near enough lmao
What would be enough for Hertl EXTENDED for you
What would it take for the Bruins to acquire Hertl

Lysell + 1st would be the ask.

(Okay depending on how you value the assets in the trade would be “not near enough”)

IMO
DeBrusk + Studnicka + 2nd >>> Lysell + 1st

I'm not high on Studnicka, he's never put up the numbers that justify valuing him so highly, and my few viewings of him haven't made me a believer.

So putting DeBrusk + 2nd = 1st, then Studnicka would have to be more valuable than Lysell, and I just can't ever see that being the case, no matter how much you like Studnicka.