SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bozak Please

Créé par: Kotkaniemi15
Équipe: 2021-22 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 31 juill. 2021
Publié: 31 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $68 937 977 $597 561 $1 475 000 $12 562 023 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 juill. 2021 à 16 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 980
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Bozak would be a good Byron replacement for the time being, but he should absolutely not be your 2C.
31 juill. 2021 à 16 h 47
#2
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
With Byron and Danult off our PK
Paquette should cycle in

Factoring out his time in OTT there's no Center on our team better on the PK
He's about 75-80% as effective as Danault was in MTL
Everyone else is about 20-30% as effective Danault was but only Byron was on his level

Simple way to rank it

Byron = best
Armia /Paquette = next best
Evans/Suzuki = potential to be more but still developing
Toffoli= pitches in as part of the 3rd PK unit
31 juill. 2021 à 16 h 52
#3
Démarrer sujet
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: bluspy88
Bozak would be a good Byron replacement for the time being, but he should absolutely not be your 2C.


Well then 3C. The 2nd and 3rd lines will get around the same ice time. Is he not a valuable 3C anymore?
31 juill. 2021 à 16 h 58
#4
Démarrer sujet
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Billy739
With Byron and Danult off our PK
Paquette should cycle in

Factoring out his time in OTT there's no Center on our team better on the PK
He's about 75-80% as effective as Danault was in MTL
Everyone else is about 20-30% as effective Danault was but only Byron was on his level

Simple way to rank it

Byron = best
Armia /Paquette = next best
Evans/Suzuki = potential to be more but still developing
Toffoli= pitches in as part of the 3rd PK unit


Are you basing this on numbers, or the eye test? Because the way I see Montréal’s PK from last year (based purely on what I’d saw watching games):

1. Armia
2. Danault/Lehkonen
3. Byron
4. Evans/Suzuki/Toffoli (Evans gets more time because he’s good at faceoffs)

So for this team, if they’re changing on the fly Suzuki comes out on the 2nd unit, but on the whistle they put out Bozak. (He was 56.8% on faceoffs last year)
Tarlam01 et Billy739 a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2021 à 17 h 32
#5
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Are you basing this on numbers, or the eye test? Because the way I see Montréal’s PK from last year (based purely on what I’d saw watching games):

1. Armia
2. Danault/Lehkonen
3. Byron
4. Evans/Suzuki/Toffoli (Evans gets more time because he’s good at faceoffs)

So for this team, if they’re changing on the fly Suzuki comes out on the 2nd unit, but on the whistle they put out Bozak. (He was 56.8% on faceoffs last year)


i'm basing it off Volume
Number of Minutes played , shots taken/blocked ,Attempts and misses
Factored in Paquette and Danaults short handed offensive production

And their numbers are closer then anyone beyond Byron
Armia is close but doesnt have the volume Danault got here or Paquette got in TBL

Armia's numbers to are playing 2nd PK
If he played 1st PK like Byron he'd have more Ice time and better stats
Its nothing personal and Armia's the future but today its Byron leading the PK still
Its why we've kept him all these years even signing him with term after injuries started piling up
Danault,Lehkonen, Armia , ext are all his Protege's he molded just like Armia will likely resume his role and do very soon.

I'm not saying they're not capable of proving me wrong but the numbers are the numbers
When Lehkonen was top PK unit we were bottom of the NHL that's just fact
When he was removed forcing us to use 3 units instead of 2 to absorb the minutes he'd have played
We became top in the NHL and i dont see Burrows changing that after having such success so early on in his career as a Assistant Coach in the NHL

Lastly take Evans profile and compare it to Danaults at his age
You'll see a lot of similarities there
Then factor in they have the same mentor in place on special teams where Danault earned his shot at Special Teams Play
He's getting played because he's not only smart and responsible but also has leadership qualities and absorbs everything like a sponge.

https://twitter.com/i/status/976961722752880640
31 juill. 2021 à 17 h 40
#6
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
I dont think the Acquired Pacquette before making Lehkonen a priority by mistake

Paquette was one of the best PK Center options
I'd say Bozak , Paquette, or Zajac were the best 3 options for MTL in that respect
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage