SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lines with Ritchie

Créé par: LGuy54
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 31 juill. 2021
Publié: 31 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Team is so deep i don't even know how to fit everyone
Transactions
TOR
    Traded anywhere for a third to comply with cap
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2581 500 000 $81 358 116 $0 $400 000 $141 884 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    725 000 $725 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    725 000 $725 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    31 juill. 2021 à 11 h 1
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 2,499
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
    lol kerfoot is a good player, why are we giving him away for nothing??

    leafs can bury engvall and maybe trade mikheyev to run a 22 man roster, or just leave mikheyev and run a 21 man roster.

    Makes no sense to give away kerfoot (our second leading scorer from the playoffs) just so michael amadio, hutch, and gabriel can sit in the press box lol
    GuiltTrip et palhal a aimé ceci.
    31 juill. 2021 à 11 h 6
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 26
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    If they wanted to get rid of Kerfoot they would have let Seattle take him.
    GuiltTrip et chungus a aimé ceci.
    31 juill. 2021 à 11 h 25
    #3
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
    I don't understand so many Leaf fans. They think Kempf and Brooks can hold the bottom six centre spots and can move up if Matthews or Tavares.
    Then they are depending so much on Bunting and Ritchie to be in the top 6 wingers. 31 other teams don't think Bunting or Ritchie are top 6, other wise they would have paid more than 950,00 and 2,5m.
    Kerfoot is needed by the Leafs.
    31 juill. 2021 à 11 h 31
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 2,499
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
    Quoting: palhal
    31 other teams don't think Bunting or Ritchie are top 6, other wise they would have paid more than 950,00 and 2,5m.
    Kerfoot is needed by the Leafs.


    to be fair, 6-7 other teams offered bunting more money to play for them and he turned it down to come to toronto

    you could also say most teams don't have a top 6 centred by matthews/tavares calibre players and two top 20 wingers like mitch/willy

    ritchie might be a third liner, but with JT/willy he could still be pretty effective imo

    i do agree though that kerfoot is quite valuable to the leafs, given he kind of does everything lol
    palhal a aimé ceci.
    31 juill. 2021 à 11 h 39
    #5
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
    Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
    to be fair, 6-7 other teams offered bunting more money to play for them and he turned it down to come to toronto

    you could also say most teams don't have a top 6 centred by matthews/tavares calibre players and two top 20 wingers like mitch/willy

    ritchie might be a third liner, but with JT/willy he could still be pretty effective imo

    i do agree though that kerfoot is quite valuable to the leafs, given he kind of does everything lol


    Leafs....like all teams to be successful need their bottom enders to play above their contract. I just think Kerfoot is needed due to the Leafs "iffiness" at centre behind Tavares and Matthews.
    Interesting that the Leafs "traded" 2.5m Ritchie for 3.8m Foligno. I wasn't impressed by Foligno and wouldn't be at anything over 2.5m.
    Yeah I hope for Ritchie and Bunting but Leafs are going to be have trouble putting together a 22 man roster.
    chungus a aimé ceci.
    31 juill. 2021 à 11 h 50
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 2,499
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
    Quoting: palhal
    Leafs are going to be have trouble putting together a 22 man roster.


    84812a5870dbf674f84f82278bec77fe.png

    ezpz, still with $217 to sparecool
    31 juill. 2021 à 12 h 24
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    TOR V5 GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,366
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
    Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
    lol kerfoot is a good player, why are we giving him away for nothing??

    leafs can bury engvall and maybe trade mikheyev to run a 22 man roster, or just leave mikheyev and run a 21 man roster.

    Makes no sense to give away kerfoot (our second leading scorer from the playoffs) just so michael amadio, hutch, and gabriel can sit in the press box lol


    I didn't give up kerfoot for nothing, i said anywhere for a third
    31 juill. 2021 à 15 h 0
    #8
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
    Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
    84812a5870dbf674f84f82278bec77fe.png

    ezpz, still with $217 to sparecool


    Well you did it. But I would hope the more expensive Liljegren makes the Leafs. Amadio and Gabariel..not as good as Engvall and Mikheyev.
    chungus a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage