SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Team USA

Créé par: xXHAMMER8Xx
Équipe: 2021-22 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 30 juill. 2021
Publié: 30 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I have DeBrincat just barrels missing the team. Torrey Krug also just misses behind Petry and Quinn Hughes.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
25999 999 999 $126 859 000 $0 $3 700 000 $873 140 999 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
858 333 $858 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Hughes, Quinn
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 juill. 2021 à 20 h 0
#1
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,925
Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
DeBrincat?
xXHAMMER8Xx a aimé ceci.
30 juill. 2021 à 20 h 13
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quinn Hughes doesn’t belong anywhere near this team.
30 juill. 2021 à 20 h 21
#3
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,256
Mentions "j'aime": 4,439
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Quinn Hughes doesn’t belong anywhere near this team.


Neither does MacAvoy


Jk….
CMcAvoy73 et xXHAMMER8Xx a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2021 à 16 h 19
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: Devil1122
DeBrincat?


He was the last guy out. Could easily make the team, maybe over someone else like Rust?
31 juill. 2021 à 16 h 21
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Quinn Hughes doesn’t belong anywhere near this team.


He doesn’t have to start. Who would you put in? I think Krug and Petry can make the team. I’m totally open ears.
1 août 2021 à 14 h 54
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: xXHAMMER8Xx
He doesn’t have to start. Who would you put in? I think Krug and Petry can make the team. I’m totally open ears.


Slavin would be the top pair LD. Krug out, Hughes out, probably Carlson out. Lots of other good options.
xXHAMMER8Xx a aimé ceci.
1 août 2021 à 15 h 43
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Slavin would be the top pair LD. Krug out, Hughes out, probably Carlson out. Lots of other good options.


I could definitely see Slavin make the team. I honestly don’t think they’d pass up on Carlson as the Vet on the team.
1 août 2021 à 15 h 48
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: xXHAMMER8Xx
I could definitely see Slavin make the team. I honestly don’t think they’d pass up on Carlson as the Vet on the team.


They can scratch Carlson i guess.

Slavin isn’t a, “i could see him making the team,” kind of guy. He’s a lock as their number 1 LD.
1 août 2021 à 18 h 36
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Quinn Hughes doesn’t belong anywhere near this team.


lol
1 août 2021 à 18 h 39
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Wqrrior
lol


Insightful
1 août 2021 à 18 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Insightful


You had the first post, and it had no more insight than mine... go on, spill the beans. I have all day.
1 août 2021 à 18 h 43
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Wqrrior
You had the first post, and it had no more insight than mine... go on, spill the beans. I have all day.


Hughes at 5 on 5 is a below average d man. Awesome on the powerplay, but fox is better. Werenski too. Therefore there’s just zero use to him being on this team. Maybe he’s the 8th d man or something in case of injury.
1 août 2021 à 18 h 51
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Hughes at 5 on 5 is a below average d man. Awesome on the powerplay, but fox is better. Werenski too. Therefore there’s just zero use to him being on this team. Maybe he’s the 8th d man or something in case of injury.


Pretty much every Canuck fan on this website will (or should) agree with you that he had a really bad season defensively. That part of your take is fine.

Let's take a look at a different player though: Dahlin. It's hard to despite his potential, and we have seen repeated flashes of his skill. But his defense is far from great. Does this mean he is forever a mediocre defensive player? McDavid was in the doghouse from advanced stat nerds for years, and then suddenly went on to master the defensive game as well.

What is more, we are looking at a player who had a offensive year that many defensemen will never reach in their careers, and are still calling it a down year. Down. Year. This implies that he has done better prior to this year. Defensively as well.


Down years don't define players. Nor do small sample sizes. It's pretty foolish to write off a player's talent just because of a bad year (which honestly everyone in VAN did, and the defensive structure also sucks - so he wasn't exactly set up to thrive).

I consider myself a pretty neutral fan compared to many on this site, but I also refuse to form a conclusion based on only recent events. Dude's 21. Pettersson hasn't been written off because of a similarly bad year, so why should Quinn? The guy was 2nd in the Calder race for a reason. That's not a bias thing. And where I agree he isn't to the level of Makar, Fox, or even Heiskanen, there is no reason to use the one down year and write him off as you've clearly inserted into many posts on here.
1 août 2021 à 18 h 54
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Wqrrior
Pretty much every Canuck fan on this website will (or should) agree with you that he had a really bad season defensively. That part of your take is fine.

Let's take a look at a different player though: Dahlin. It's hard to despite his potential, and we have seen repeated flashes of his skill. But his defense is far from great. Does this mean he is forever a mediocre defensive player? McDavid was in the doghouse from advanced stat nerds for years, and then suddenly went on to master the defensive game as well.

What is more, we are looking at a player who had a offensive year that many defensemen will never reach in their careers, and are still calling it a down year. Down. Year. This implies that he has done better prior to this year. Defensively as well.


Down years don't define players. Nor do small sample sizes. It's pretty foolish to write off a player's talent just because of a bad year (which honestly everyone in VAN did, and the defensive structure also sucks - so he wasn't exactly set up to thrive).

I consider myself a pretty neutral fan compared to many on this site, but I also refuse to form a conclusion based on only recent events. Dude's 21. Pettersson hasn't been written off because of a similarly bad year, so why should Quinn? The guy was 2nd in the Calder race for a reason. That's not a bias thing. And where I agree he isn't to the level of Makar, Fox, or even Heiskanen, there is no reason to use the one down year and write him off as you've clearly inserted into many posts on here.


Defining players? What are you talking about? If you want to get into that, sure. Writing off a players talent? What? I just said he doesn’t belong anywhere near this team. And that’s because he isn’t an adequate defensive player. I was judging him based on his down year. I’m basing this off his career.
1 août 2021 à 19 h 34
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
They can scratch Carlson i guess.

Slavin isn’t a, “i could see him making the team,” kind of guy. He’s a lock as their number 1 LD.


That’s fair. But Carlson and MAYBE Hughes should make the team.
1 août 2021 à 19 h 38
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: xXHAMMER8Xx
That’s fair. But Carlson and MAYBE Hughes should make the team.


Hughes shouldn’t even get any consideration.
1 août 2021 à 19 h 40
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Hughes shouldn’t even get any consideration.


I respectfully disagree. His offensive abilities are to elite to not crack the team.
1 août 2021 à 19 h 45
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: xXHAMMER8Xx
I respectfully disagree. His offensive abilities are to elite to not crack the team.


He’s awesome on the PP, but fox would take top PP duties. There’s just no use for him.
xXHAMMER8Xx a aimé ceci.
1 août 2021 à 19 h 49
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
He’s awesome on the PP, but fox would take top PP duties. There’s just no use for him.


You have to be prepared for injuries. Anything happens to Fox, Quinn can handle the offensive responsibilities.
1 août 2021 à 19 h 51
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: xXHAMMER8Xx
You have to be prepared for injuries. Anything happens to Fox, Quinn can handle the offensive responsibilities.


So could werenski. And he’s not atrocious defensively.
1 août 2021 à 19 h 54
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
So could werenski. And he’s not atrocious defensively.


All you would have to do is put Quinn on a pairing with your boy McAvoy, and that pairing wouldn’t be putrid. Plus Quinn is better offensively than Werenski.
1 août 2021 à 20 h 1
#22
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: xXHAMMER8Xx
All you would have to do is put Quinn on a pairing with your boy McAvoy, and that pairing wouldn’t be putrid. Plus Quinn is better offensively than Werenski.


There are significantly better options.
1 août 2021 à 20 h 2
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
There are significantly better options.


Again, I disagree. I say we agree to disagree.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage