SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Finishing Touches on an Imperfect Roster

Créé par: BeterChiarelli
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 29 juill. 2021
Publié: 29 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This level of detail may appear to be the ramblings of a madman. Take that as you will.

The key foci of this AGM are Winnipeg missing the boat on a backup goaltender and Dallas needing to shed Khudobin in order to find ice time for Oettinger. In this instance I think Edmonton can take advantage of both teams needs: I fully believe that Dobby is too pricey (in acquisition cost and term specifically) for the Jets to go out and get him themselves. I also believe the Jets may want to aim a touch higher than Stalock, who is likely more apt for AHL employment this season. A retained Koskinen remains one of the only options in terms of a readily-available backup netminder besides the remains of Devan Dubnyk: in this instance, the Jets take the better goaltender with upside to maintain or improve upon his .917sv% form. Because Edmonton cannot retain beyond the shown $1M, I have the Oilers recouping Beaulieu (total AAV equals a 50% Koskinen and makes some room on their back end) and a diminished return in a b-prospect and late pick.

I think the peak price on Khudobin given the Stars' desire to make room for Oettinger is a b-prospect and a 3rd round pick. Given the Oilers' cap constraints however, a second round pick probably appeals to the Stars more as I require them to retain just shy of league-minimum AND take Beaulieu off the Oilers' books. Nate can either play or to be buried: in either case, the Stars free up $500k after Oettinger is added to the main roster, $1.5M if they bury Beaulieu. With Bishop on LTIR, could be the difference in adding quality up front before or during the season.

Blink and you'll miss it, Holland mentioned wanting another defenceman to add and is on record of hating having more than four RHD (see: Bear trade). I don't think anyone expects Russell to play an entire season thus I wanted the upgrade to be somewhat substantial within the means of the Oilers' cap situation. I think Murray on a more Cole-esque deal than what he signed for last year is a perfect fit: I wouldn't be surprised to see Murray-Bouchard even emerge as the Oilers' second pair by midseason. The addition of another defender likely means Lagesson is going to be waived: this is poor asset management and the justification for the Minnesota trade, which admittedly only works if the Wild are interested in Lagesson. If the pairings fall as Brodin-Spurgeon, Goligoski-Dumba, and Kulikov-Mermis, Lagesson offers more at a lower price in that #7 slot than AHL journeyman Jon Lizotte. My ask I don't believe is all that extravagant either: Dewar appears to be an AHL tweener/late bloomer and Johansson is one of those names I wanted late in 2018 and appears to be a buy-low candidate. The Oilers system is not flush with RHD with Bouchard graduating and I think SiJo, pending a successful year in Finland, can at the very minimum make an impact at the AHL level. The Oilers as an organization highly value Kris Russell and losing Lagesson to waivers is poor asset management: I think a return similar to Kurtis MacDermid (re: a 4th) is possible here but I have less interest in assets that won't be ready in 4 years as opposed to depth pieces that could contribute in a year or two. Very 'meh' deal from an external POV but a shrewd case of asset management I believe.

Finally, the Canucks trade addresses a miniscule gap in their goaltending depth: I fully expect Silovs to play big minutes in the ECHL this season which means the Canucks are left with Dubnyk, a laundry list of ineffective AHL goaltenders, or the Oilers' Stalock to split starts with DiPietro. Vancouver's new AHL team isn't flush with pivots either and I believe Rasanen has some value as an AHL-ready prospect for their system. I suspect the only reason Edmonton hasn't signed him is his not being a Holland pick and/or Edmonton's hit-or-miss relationship with Finns post-Puljujarvi. I don't know how highly Kunz is regarded in the Canucks' system but I do recognize that he's still likely 2 or 3 years out from the AHL. Because I'm less interested in a draft pick and much more interested in a prospect that would be ready sooner, I think the value is fine regarding Abbotsford acquiring more AHL depth even if Kunz stretches out the definition of 'ready sooner' a touch.

Signings are relatively straightforward: I have Foegele signing his QO as I think the Oilers' brass would appreciate a closer look at what he does for the team before offering him too much money. If Yamamoto comes in lower, Foegele can come in higher. Cairns, Johansson, and Tullio to sign before the AHL playoffs. Rodrigue gets the entire season in the ECHL.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
12 150 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Beaulieu, Nathan
  2. Reichel, Kristian
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Koskinen, Mikko (1 000 000 $ retained)
2.
EDM
  1. Khudobin, Anton (683 333 $ retained)
DAL
  1. Beaulieu, Nathan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
3.
4.
EDM
  1. Kunz, Jackson [Liste de réserve]
VAN
  1. Räsänen, Aapeli [Liste de réserve]
  2. Stalock, Alex
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de WPG
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 796 968 $669 339 $907 500 $703 032 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 juill. 2021 à 16 h 36
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,771
Mentions "j'aime": 1,386
VAN decline
29 juill. 2021 à 16 h 36
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,958
Mentions "j'aime": 7,726
Buffalo might be a better target for a Koskinen trade. But if Khudobin isn't available for fairly cheap I'd rather just keep Koskinen.
29 juill. 2021 à 17 h 12
#28
Simpleton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,365
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
If we look to hockey-reference, over the span of January 13th to February 6th while Smith was hurt, Koskinen was an .889sv% goaltender. This was bad yes but also saw him play 12 games in 24 days, a workload he's not known to handle. Once Smith returned, over the span of February 9th to May 15th (13 games), Koskinen sported a 0.929sv%. Had it not been for Holland's inability to keep a goaltender to play with Koskinen, it's increasingly likely that both of Edmonton's goaltenders would have been in the Vezina conversation.

If we turn to naturalstattrick, over the past three seasons Koskinen has maintained a 0.916sv% (re: league average) at even-strength play. For goaltenders over this span that have played 1900min or more (such that there are 62 goalies to look at, two per team over this window) Koskinen ranks 43rd with that same save percentage ahead of names like Demko, Georgiev, Korpisalo, and Hart. If we assume that there are three tiers of goaltender - starter, tandem, and backup - with natural jenks every 20 some-odd goaltenders, Koskinen is either a poor man's tandem goaltender or the peak of backup netminders. This is the exact value I want to extract out of him.

I recognize that he's paid like a starter and cannot perform in that role. That's the point of the retention. He has ONE year left on his deal and I've shown that the Jets can make the cap work in a trade for Koskinen. What hasn't happened in this conversation is any rational sort of reply from any of Koskinen's detractors about how or why he "sucks". Koskinen is at minimum a league average goaltender who's only genuine downside is his cap hit.

It's not bias. It's not trolling. You simply don't have a point to make and resort to name-calling.


Save percentage is a common indicator used to evaluate a goaltender, but it is based on shot volume and quite heavily influenced by the quality of shots allowed by the team in front of the goaltender. I know it seems ridiculous to suggest that Edmonton's defense may bolster their goaltender's stats, but oddly enough the numbers seem to suggest the Oiler d-men did okay. Goals saved above expected (GSAx), while not perfect, is probably a better measure of a goaltender's performance because it factors quality of scoring chances and not simply shot volume.

FWIW last season Mike Smith had the fourth best GSAx, at 14.4, and that was born out by his outstanding play. On the other hand, among the 28 goaltenders with between 20 and 30 starts, Koskinen ranked 18th. He posted a GSAx of -10.2, which is right between Braden Holtby (-11.4) and Pekka Rinne (-9.7). That's not great company to be keeping when you are paid a starter's wage, but the number is roughly middle of the pack. Koskinen's GSAx would be much better if not for his struggles at the beginning of the season, his penchant for allowing first-shot goals from time to time, and his miserable performance in his final couple of starts. However, most of those poor performances are on him, and all goaltenders would have better stats if we simply eliminated those games in which they struggle.

Of interest to the the discussion, in 2020/21 Koskinen and Khuldobin have remarkably similar stats. Khudobin played six more games than Koskinen and allowed the same number of goals. The difference between the rest of their numbers is minimal, and could easily have ended in Koskinen's favour if he didn't struggle in his first dozen starts. Then again, they might have been better despite that start, had Koskinen not suffered the performance gaffs mentioned earlier.

The numbers suggest that in comparison to his peers, Koskinen is a league average backup goaltender, capable of starting between 25 and 30 games, and likely to cost his team 3-4 of those games because of his inconsistency. The difficulty in moving his contract stems from a his salary, and the relative availability of comparable goaltenders. On that note, the advanced statistics also suggest that the Oilers might not improve their lot by pursuing Khudobin. While he might be able to start a few more games than Koskinen, and he may not suffer the same wild swings in performance, his overall contribution is likely to be very similar.
BeterChiarelli et SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage