SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

lol Vanecek is back as predicted by moi

Créé par: brady_t12
Équipe: 2021-22 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 28 juill. 2021
Publié: 28 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
Transactions
WSH
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Anybody who wants him! Not specifically Anaheim.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WPG
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 462 928 $472 927 $132 500 $14 037 072 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
791 667 $791 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
716 667 $716 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 juill. 2021 à 19 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,516
Mentions "j'aime": 6,127
Not sure why Seattle didn't just ask for a 2nd to not select Vanecek in the first place. Then they could have taken someone else from Washington.
28 juill. 2021 à 19 h 39
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 5,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,659
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Not sure why Seattle didn't just ask for a 2nd to not select Vanecek in the first place. Then they could have taken someone else from Washington.


I’m pretty sure they didn’t know Grubauer was leaving COL
28 juill. 2021 à 19 h 40
#3
Démarrer sujet
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,097
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Not sure why Seattle didn't just ask for a 2nd to not select Vanecek in the first place. Then they could have taken someone else from Washington.


Francis doesn’t really seem to have a good grip on asset management and how this expansion thing works… I’m totally fine with this though.
28 juill. 2021 à 19 h 42
#4
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,628
Mentions "j'aime": 12,355
Really wish the Jets had just sent a later pick over for Schultz then Dillon, Chevy likes paying for other teams problems like Eakin, Stastny, Dillon and Schultz.
28 juill. 2021 à 19 h 48
#5
Démarrer sujet
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,097
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Really wish the Jets had just sent a later pick over for Schultz then Dillon, Chevy likes paying for other teams problems like Eakin, Stastny, Dillon and Schultz.


I wouldn’t call Dillon a problem except for the fact that we couldn’t afford his cap hit. His contract is more than fair, given some of the terrible contracts given out today. But we we’re cap strapped. Agree however that Chevy overpaid.
BIGRUSS62 a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 19 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Quoting: brady_t12
I wouldn’t call Dillon a problem except for the fact that we couldn’t afford his cap hit. His contract is more than fair, given some of the terrible contracts given out today. But we we’re cap strapped. Agree however that Chevy overpaid.


It was an overpayment but I’m not sure I agree that Dillon is a problem, like you said he’s well worth his deal, Washington just couldn’t afford him anymore.
brady_t12 a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 19 h 51
#7
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,628
Mentions "j'aime": 12,355
Quoting: brady_t12
I wouldn’t call Dillon a problem except for the fact that we couldn’t afford his cap hit. His contract is more than fair, given some of the terrible contracts given out today. But we we’re cap strapped. Agree however that Chevy overpaid.


Well, I get that but if you couldn't afford his cap hit he was a problem.

Don't get me wrong, Dillon will help but he's an older version of Stanley and Samberg, don't get why the need for a guy when there's two in house options who are cheaper to pay and cost nothing to acquire.

Schultz would've been a better pickup for the Jets imo.
28 juill. 2021 à 19 h 59
#8
Démarrer sujet
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,097
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Well, I get that but if you couldn't afford his cap hit he was a problem.

Don't get me wrong, Dillon will help but he's an older version of Stanley and Samberg, don't get why the need for a guy when there's two in house options who are cheaper to pay and cost nothing to acquire.

Schultz would've been a better pickup for the Jets imo.


I think its just semantics at this point. We both agree he’s a decent defenseman and that the contract isn’t terrible by any means, but our cap situation was a problem for us.

Agree that Schultz could’ve made more sense especially since you guys got Schmidt right after the Dillon trade.
28 juill. 2021 à 20 h 8
#9
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,628
Mentions "j'aime": 12,355
Quoting: tsyls
It was an overpayment but I’m not sure I agree that Dillon is a problem, like you said he’s well worth his deal, Washington just couldn’t afford him anymore.


The more I think about these two deals the less I like them, I just don't get what they're doing with Heinola and Samberg plus the cap issues this creates next season is concerning.
tsyls a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 21 h 59
#10
MakingHistory
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 4,849
Mentions "j'aime": 447
whats wrong with Justin Schultz?
28 juill. 2021 à 22 h 53
#11
Démarrer sujet
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,097
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
Quoting: MakingHistory
whats wrong with Justin Schultz?


Nothing, we just can't really afford him.
28 juill. 2021 à 22 h 59
#12
MakingHistory
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 4,849
Mentions "j'aime": 447
Quoting: brady_t12
Nothing, we just can't really afford him.


want Kulak for him?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage