SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Dallas Stars signed Ryan Suter (4 Years / $3,650,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


28 juill. 2021 à 11 h 59
#26
In Zito We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 1,596
Quoting: BCAPP
If he retires whole cap hit stays given 35+ contract


For a buyout i mean
Joe_La_Garnotte a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 2
#27
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 926
Mentions "j'aime": 519
Still an excellent shutdown player but the term is bad.
IconicHawk a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 3
#28
Not yet trannycided
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 6,607
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
It won't be long before two different teams will be paying Suter to not play for them. Yes, he still has some left in the tank, but this is ridiculous.

EDIT: Whoa whoa whoa, it's a 35+ contract? I did not think it could possibly get worse...
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 9
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 8
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I think they will willing to do this term considering a buyout in year 3 or 4 won't go against cap at his age.
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 11
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Morzski
Surprised Suter didn't go for signing with a contender. Guess he wanted more money/term?


Dallas was in the cup finals two years ago and were missing their number 1C last year. They're a dark horse contender
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 11
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 8
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: VijayPatel11
For a buyout i mean


No I believe new rule is a buyout on a 35+ contract does not hit cap, which is why they were willing to do this term. It's not a great contract, but I don't think it's as bad as people think.
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 11
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: VijayPatel11
For a buyout i mean


Planning for a buyout is a really weird way to manage a team
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 13
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 8
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: BCAPP
Planning for a buyout is a really weird way to manage a team


Agreed
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 21
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 12,657
Mentions "j'aime": 17,293
Too much term and AAV
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 27
#35
I want Gourde back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,524
Mentions "j'aime": 2,350
Man Suter is gonna be making a lot of money over the rest of his career
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 53
#36
Let's go Pens!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 382
Modifié 28 juill. 2021 à 13 h 0
Most of you guys didn't understand the point here. To sign for such salary Suter asks for more term. Any team which wanted him for just 1 or 2 years would have to spend something like 5M/year. I think 3 years would be better, but I wouldn't be complaining if I were Dallas fan. Besides, the window to win of the team is almost closed. So, I like it.
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 55
#37
Phil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 70
Mentions "j'aime": 128
Ryan Suter's career has been some of the riskiest contracts in NHL history man
28 juill. 2021 à 13 h 20
#38
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Why didn't the Wild trade Suter to Dallas half retained and save 3M on the cap?

Dallas gave too much term in this deal.


Brilliant.
28 juill. 2021 à 13 h 25
#39
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,560
Mentions "j'aime": 3,043
Quoting: Roysboy72
$3.65 million!? For FOUR years!?!?? Not gonna age well at all.


$3.65m is cheap. He's a legit top 4 D who can handle a top pairing role. Is the 4 years ideal? Probably not but for those complaining about the term, he likely would have gotten $5m for 2years so the extra term was a way to drive the AAV down.
28 juill. 2021 à 13 h 26
#40
Steve Durbano Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 92
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Maybe Suter will get bought out by the Stars in a year or two and he can sign somewhere else and get the salary hat trick that Lecavallier almost achieved.
Joe_La_Garnotte a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 13 h 26
#41
Steve Durbano Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 92
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: VijayPatel11
For a buyout i mean


Every dime counts
28 juill. 2021 à 13 h 38
#42
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 677
Mentions "j'aime": 271
the cap hit is fine- I expected around 4mil per...but for 1 or 2 years. 3 is a stretch....4? ugh.
still a very useful top 4 dman...but for how long is the question.
28 juill. 2021 à 13 h 44
#43
i hope ur hungry now
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 2,411
Mentions "j'aime": 978
Quoting: VijayPatel11
As long as its heavily front loaded it is fine


It's actually heavily back loaded this time
Joe_La_Garnotte a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 14 h 29
#44
yippee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,171
Quoting: JayTea
$3.65m is cheap. He's a legit top 4 D who can handle a top pairing role. Is the 4 years ideal? Probably not but for those complaining about the term, he likely would have gotten $5m for 2years so the extra term was a way to drive the AAV down.

Yeah, the money is only a problem when considering regression, but the term goes until when his original contract ended before the buyout, which certainly isn't optimal.
28 juill. 2021 à 14 h 37
#45
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,560
Mentions "j'aime": 3,043
Quoting: Roysboy72
Yeah, the money is only a problem when considering regression, but the term goes until when his original contract ended before the buyout, which certainly isn't optimal.


It isn't ideal, but it's not an albatross either. Honestly when both Suter and Parise were on the Wild, I expected Suter to be able to play out the entire deal so he may still be a decent bottom pairing guy at 40.
28 juill. 2021 à 17 h 22
#46
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,102
Mentions "j'aime": 830
Quoting: VijayPatel11
As long as its heavily front loaded it is fine


It looks heavily rear loaded ...
28 juill. 2021 à 22 h 30
#47
Western Champs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2015
Messages: 272
Mentions "j'aime": 251
Modifié 28 juill. 2021 à 22 h 36
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Why didn't the Wild trade Suter to Dallas half retained and save 3M on the cap?

Dallas gave too much term in this deal.


Because Suter can block the trade from Minnesota with is NMC and sign a brand new deal to make more money and yeah term is to long
8 août 2021 à 17 h 44
#48
Bruins r the
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 73
Mentions "j'aime": 4
just y??
1 oct. 2022 à 16 h 9
#49
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,925
Mentions "j'aime": 10,165
Quoting: justaBoss
Cap and player is fine, but THAT TERM IS FRIGGING RIDICULOUS


You said it yourself buddy,
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2023 à 21 h 48
#50
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,201
Mentions "j'aime": 13,729
Might just be the worst thing to ever happen to this franchise…
kdawg32086 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage