SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(CHI/TBL) - Seabrook for Johnson + 2nd

Who won the trade?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


28 juill. 2021 à 9 h 28
#76
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Chances Johnson will be bought out before his contract is up?
28 juill. 2021 à 9 h 46
#77
Watches no games
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,268
Mentions "j'aime": 976
Johnson is still a good player. Give him a spot as 2nd line C and he will score in accordance with it. His problem has been usage rather than the suggested narrative of rapid decline.

Chicago has made some questionable-to-terrible moves this off-season. This isn't one of them.
Boltsbeathabs a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 9 h 49
#78
Canes fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 4,475
Mentions "j'aime": 4,578
Time for more LTIR. Johnson will be missed in Tampa.
Boltsbeathabs a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2021 à 11 h 20
#79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,038
Mentions "j'aime": 541
A lot of arguing about the salary cap and LTIR here, but I want to talk about the trade. The benefits for Tampa are obvious -- they were desperate to get rid of Johnson's cap hit and Seabrook's won't count against them -- but I'm surprised that Chicago was interested. With the moves they've made over the last couple of weeks it's clear that they're going for it, so why are they giving up most of their remaining cap space for another team's salary dump and only a 2nd round pick two years out? This puts them within $2.5M of the cap with still a couple of RFAs to sign, so they can't really afford to be taking other teams' salary dumps. Johnson did play well in the playoffs this year, so the Hawks must think he's still worth $15M over the next 3 years; otherwise they would have been better off to spend that cap space on something else.
28 juill. 2021 à 16 h 18
#80
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,460
Mentions "j'aime": 2,421
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
so salty lmao. Pens went back to back, and did it even better lmao


JBB BEST GM IN SPORTS POINT SIGNS
28 juill. 2021 à 16 h 23
#81
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,489
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
JBB BEST GM IN SPORTS POINT SIGNS


Lmao and? A 2 year old could’ve signed point 😂
29 juill. 2021 à 17 h 41
#82
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,386
Mentions "j'aime": 2,880
Quoting: BCAPP
Make an actual two level cap.

Above the first level pay a luxury tax can't go above the next level. Make it like 20% above the first one.

For every aav 5% over the cap pay a dollar in luxury tax, every $ 5-10% over pay $2 in luxury tax, 10-15% $3, and 15-20% $4

Money goes to the small revenue or something teams so they can afford to spend and compete.

Or something like that.

So roughly
Min cap 60 mil
Luxury tax cap 84 mil
Max 100 mil


Luxury taxes hurt small market teams more than big market teams, as seen in the MLB. It will allow reach teams to spend up and quality players will leave for better money offered from the top market teams
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2021 à 17 h 55
#83
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: phillyjabroni
Luxury taxes hurt small market teams more than big market teams, as seen in the MLB. It will allow reach teams to spend up and quality players will leave for better money offered from the top market teams


I think (I am happy to be corrected) that is because they don't have the second ceiling.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2021 à 16 h 38
#84
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
You know what, I say fair deal. While that cap hit isn't ideal, Tyler Johnson is still a good player and will contribute positively to the Blackhawks, plus they get a 2nd round pick as a nice bonus, while the Lightning get some much needed LTIR cap relief
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage