SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

MAF huge Yikes

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 27 juill. 2021
Publié: 27 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
VGK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $70 341 714 $452 439 $4 265 000 $11 158 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 42
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Dreger said nothing going to LV.
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
The return is nothing
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,600
Mentions "j'aime": 18,154




Mikkael Mikael Hakkarainen?
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 37
#4
... We're a "Team"..
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,426
Mentions "j'aime": 1,137
Aren't Seabrook and Shaw officially retired? Or are they forever on LTIR?
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
for free. Rare W for stan
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Wadejos123
for free. Rare W for stan


Still costs a lot of cap space. Basically took us out of doing anything in FA.
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 42
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Still costs a lot of cap space. Basically took us out of doing anything in FA.


What would we have done with the money that helps us more than getting the vezina winner though? We can't be allocating cap long term with Jones extention kicking in in a year anyways, plus Cat and Dach extentions coming shortly as well. Who on a one year deal did you want to sign that is better than this? There is no LD that helps us in FA, Martinez signed with Vegas already.
Earth a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,600
Mentions "j'aime": 18,154
There are 8-12 teams seriously looking for goalies....
Did they want the Vezina trophy winner for nothing?
Nope.
They want to hold off for Antti Raanta and Linus freakin' Ullmark.
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 48
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,352
Mentions "j'aime": 2,738
MAF might retire which makes Bowman look even more stupid.
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 48
#10
Not yet trannycided
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 6,607
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
They used him as a cap dump? Are you kidding me?
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 49
#11
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Wadejos123
What would we have done with the money that helps us more than getting the vezina winner though? We can't be allocating cap long term with Jones extention kicking in in a year anyways, plus Cat and Dach extentions coming shortly as well. Who on a one year deal did you want to sign that is better than this? There is no LD that helps us in FA, Martinez signed with Vegas already.


I get that he just won a Vezina, but the chances he plays so well again? In front of the Hawks D? I find it unlikely he will be able to sustain a high level again. I hope I’m wrong if/when he plays.
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 51
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 828
Mentions "j'aime": 715
Quoting: Wadejos123
What would we have done with the money that helps us more than getting the vezina winner though? We can't be allocating cap long term with Jones extention kicking in in a year anyways, plus Cat and Dach extentions coming shortly as well. Who on a one year deal did you want to sign that is better than this? There is no LD that helps us in FA, Martinez signed with Vegas already.


I agree. Wait until next year for big free agency signings. I made a team a while ago where I signed Fleury for the 22-23 season. Acquiring him now increases our chance of resigning him when this deal is over. Fleury/Lankinen tandem is pretty damn good.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 53
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,146
Mentions "j'aime": 199
How is this a "yikes"
This is a great move for the hawks for this coming season. They don't commit to any FA long term with Jones deal coming next year along with resigning Dach, Strome, and Kurashev. It makes perfect sense... for once.
Wadejos123 et Earth a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 53
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I get that he just won a Vezina, but the chances he plays so well again? In front of the Hawks D? I find it unlikely he will be able to sustain a high level again. I hope I’m wrong if/when he plays.


Just wondering what you would have rather done is all. Can't say that it's a bad use of cap if you don't have any better way to use it. Lets assume the rumors that he will retire aern't true for the sake of argument, worst case is we still suck this year and trade him half retained for a pick. Fleury is undoubtedly better than subban. We're better at keeping it out of our own net than we were an hour ago and we got him for free. I'm not complianing
27 juill. 2021 à 11 h 55
#15
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Wadejos123
Just wondering what you would have rather done is all. Can't say that it's a bad use of cap if you don't have any better way to use it. Lets assume the rumors that he will retire aern't true for the sake of argument, worst case is we still suck this year and trade him half retained for a pick. Fleury is undoubtedly better than subban. We're better at keeping it out of our own net than we were an hour ago and we got him for free. I'm not complianing


I wanted to shore up the D some more, like Jake McCabe and resigning the RFA’s would have been nice. MAF had a career year and probably won’t replicate it.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage