SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Id like this too

Créé par: aecliptic
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 25 juill. 2021
Publié: 25 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
45 350 000 $
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Chytil, Filip [Droits de RFA]
  2. Georgiev, Alexandar
  3. Jones, Zachary
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Soucy, Carson
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de SEA
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $66 045 635 $0 $7 950 000 $15 454 365 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Rangers de New York
737 500 $737 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juill. 2021 à 15 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 216
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Tbh i think Barclay playing RW with Bread and Dvoark would be a good lineup. Also Crouse should be playing 3rd line with Gauthier is HS and also weeee need centers and this ins't it my dude.... I would suggest signing like a Tyler Bozack or Luke Glending or I have heard them going for Jordan Martihook.
25 juill. 2021 à 15 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 245
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Question, is Dvorak an upgrade over strome? I think a better target should be danault or Cirelli, they are both clearly better then strome
25 juill. 2021 à 15 h 37
#3
Démarrer sujet
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: Forbesy
Question, is Dvorak an upgrade over strome? I think a better target should be danault or Cirelli, they are both clearly better then strome


Dvorak is most definitely an upgrade over Strome. Hes better defensively and on faceoffs. The Panarin factor will obviously give him a significant boost in points as it did for Strome.
TBL wont trade Cirelli, forget that.
Danault may be better defensively, but hes pretty much the same on faceoffs as Dvorak. What Danault isnt is anything offensive. Hes a 3C who is going to get paid and to play 2C.

What youre also getting by trading for Dvorak is a cost controlled contract for 4 years during which we will have to resign all of the core pieces to this team.
25 juill. 2021 à 15 h 39
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,990
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: Forbesy
Question, is Dvorak an upgrade over strome? I think a better target should be danault or Cirelli, they are both clearly better then strome


I think Danault is going to get signed for way more than he's worth (duration and AAV). Given what Drury gave Goodrow, that scares the Hell out of me.

Cirelli would definitely be preferred over Dvorak. But even with their Cap crunch, Tampa would be reluctant to part with him (especially after losing Gourde down the middle). Would still require a hefty package for him. And after the Buchnevich trade, Drury scares me there, as well.
25 juill. 2021 à 15 h 46
#5
Démarrer sujet
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: mboss618
Tbh i think Barclay playing RW with Bread and Dvoark would be a good lineup. Also Crouse should be playing 3rd line with Gauthier is HS and also weeee need centers and this ins't it my dude.... I would suggest signing like a Tyler Bozack or Luke Glending or I have heard them going for Jordan Martihook.


Drury was interviewed and spoke about he Buch trade and how it was not just cost bust also about there not being enough time to get everyone the ice they deserved. This is a full fledged commitment to Kakko and Krav in the top 6.

Secondly, Goodrow has and can play center. You can take all those attributes that make him such an important depth player for a team and add in his career 52% faceoff win percentage. So going after Bozak is pointless.

Glendenning is a specialist who will cost us extra cash and will likely want some term. Rooney is meant to play the 4C spot this year with Barron on deck.

I have Gauthier on the 3rd line as a show me something. I think Gallant can do with Gauthier what he did with Alex Tuch.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage