SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Francis is busy tonight

Créé par: gpmack95
Équipe: 2021-22 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 23 juill. 2021
Publié: 23 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
43 250 000 $
2850 000 $
Transactions
1.
SEA
  1. Chytil, Filip [Droits de RFA]
NYR
  1. Soucy, Carson
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
2.
SEA
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
PIT
  1. MacDermid, Kurtis
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
3.
SEA
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. Joseph, Mathieu
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
4.
SEA
  1. Strålman, Anton
  2. Vatrano, Frank
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
FLA
5.
SEA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de SEA
Logo de TBL
Logo de SEA
Logo de FLA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TBL
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de FLA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 944 166 $0 $0 $14 555 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 533 333 $2 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
737 500 $737 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
716 667 $716 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juill. 2021 à 12 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Easy decline from the Rangers. I can see Strome in this deal though.
23 juill. 2021 à 12 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: hero9154
Easy decline from the Rangers. I can see Strome in this deal though.


I find Rangers fans dislike or unappreciation of Strome fascinating. Strome has been way better than chytil the last two years. I know he's played with breadman a bunch (though he was off for a while and Strome kept it up) but still.
23 juill. 2021 à 12 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Quoting: BCAPP
I find Rangers fans dislike or unappreciation of Strome fascinating. Strome has been way better than chytil the last two years. I know he's played with breadman a bunch (though he was off for a while and Strome kept it up) but still.


I don't think Rangers fans dislike or unappreciation Strome (some might) but in this deal Strome is going to cost more $$$ while Chytil is cost controlled and the Rangers need flexibility with Kakko, Fox, Laffy, etc all needing deals in the next few years.
23 juill. 2021 à 12 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,267
Mentions "j'aime": 699
I can see the Leafs taking an interest in blackwell at under league minimum, a 3rd might be a bit much, but I could see the interest
23 juill. 2021 à 13 h 6
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: hero9154
I don't think Rangers fans dislike or unappreciation Strome (some might) but in this deal Strome is going to cost more $$$ while Chytil is cost controlled and the Rangers need flexibility with Kakko, Fox, Laffy, etc all needing deals in the next few years.


Chytil is an RFA so not really cost controlled... But I see your point to a degree.
23 juill. 2021 à 13 h 20
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Quoting: BCAPP
Chytil is an RFA so not really cost controlled... But I see your point to a degree.


Being a non arbitration eligible RFA is literally the definition of cost controlled.
23 juill. 2021 à 13 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,705
Mentions "j'aime": 994
Cap dump for the Penguins? I would think Zucker has some value.
23 juill. 2021 à 14 h 51
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: hero9154
Being a non arbitration eligible RFA is literally the definition of cost controlled.


No being signed for term at a fixed cost is
23 juill. 2021 à 14 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Quoting: BCAPP
No being signed for term at a fixed cost is


And that is what a non arbitration eligible RFA is going to be.
23 juill. 2021 à 14 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: hero9154
And that is what a non arbitration eligible RFA is going to be.


He can refuse to sign and go overseas, he can sign an offersheet, he can out negotiate and get an overly large contract, he can sign a one year deal, etc.

He is what he is. A RESTRICTED free agent.

Are KK and Laf cost controlled because they'll be non arbitration eligible rfas in 1 and 2 years?
23 juill. 2021 à 15 h 0
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Quoting: BCAPP
He can refuse to sign and go overseas, he can sign an offersheet, he can out negotiate and get an overly large contract, he can sign a one year deal, etc.

He is what he is. A RESTRICTED free agent.

Are KK and Laf cost controlled because they'll be non arbitration eligible rfas in 1 and 2 years?


Yes by definition any player under team control (RFA or under contract) is cost controlled because they aren't arbitration eligible so they will receive a qualifying offer with a set cost.
23 juill. 2021 à 15 h 6
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: hero9154
Yes by definition any player under team control (RFA or under contract) is cost controlled because they aren't arbitration eligible so they will receive a qualifying offer with a set cost.


Yeah that's just not true. Look at say Marner. He was an arbitration eligible rfa....
23 juill. 2021 à 15 h 7
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Quoting: BCAPP
Yeah that's just not true. Look at say Marner. He was an arbitration eligible rfa....


You said it yourself..."He was an arbitration eligible rfa". We are talking about a non arbitration eligible player.
23 juill. 2021 à 15 h 9
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: hero9154
You said it yourself..."He was an arbitration eligible rfa". We are talking about a non arbitration eligible player.


Sorry I mean non arbitration eligible. He came right out of elc
23 juill. 2021 à 15 h 32
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,136
Mentions "j'aime": 444
It's going to cost at the most a 2nd to dump Strålman and because of the Yandle buyout, the Panthers don't have a burning need to do that. Now, why would the Panthers give away a 20-goal scorer in Vatrano for free?
23 juill. 2021 à 15 h 52
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Quoting: BCAPP
Sorry I mean non arbitration eligible. He came right out of elc


OK but still his options were limited (and you kind of answered your that in a previous post). The lack of arbitration rights really limits a players options to pretty much doing whatever the team wants him to do or just going overseas until the team would trade their rights. You have them under exclusive control for a while so you essentially eradicate all free market value he may have.
23 juill. 2021 à 18 h 1
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: hero9154
OK but still his options were limited (and you kind of answered your that in a previous post). The lack of arbitration rights really limits a players options to pretty much doing whatever the team wants him to do or just going overseas until the team would trade their rights. You have them under exclusive control for a while so you essentially eradicate all free market value he may have.


You limit options not eliminate. Hence it's not truly cost controlled until signed.
23 juill. 2021 à 19 h 52
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Quoting: BCAPP
You limit options not eliminate. Hence it's not truly cost controlled until signed.


If your options are sign here for x or go play overseas for less than x, you are cost controlled. If x is $2M today, tomorrow or next month, you are cost controlled.
23 juill. 2021 à 19 h 54
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Is Ron Francis awake?! I think he got lost somewhere in Seattle's Skid Row. Those feces spots and random needles are tough to avoid at first
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage