Modifié 23 juill. 2021 à 0 h 5
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
A 24 year old with one year in the mid 3’s is a lot different than a 30 year old with four years left a shade under 6, and a goalie thats 32 and has ranged from bad to mediocre over the last four years.
To clarify, I never stated Holtby wasn't a cap dump.
Honestly im confused...
Schimdt was a top pairing defenseman two seasons ago with great positive cap value. Last year he was a top four, one worse season (not a bad one) and he's now a cap dump? Did you watch Schmidt play or is this just looking on DB?
So Schmidt is not a positive asset, but Debrusk who is a middle six forward who had a bad season is still a positive asset? Debrusk turns 25 at the start of the season, so there's a 5 year age gap between him and Schmidt. So what age is it no longer a cap dump? Is it 25?
Since we are going back and fourth between two threads I think this goes with my statement in the other thread,
"I'll accept my designation into the delusional category. Heck looking at comments on this site it's either 95% of people making AGM teams are delusional, or 95% of comments are coming from people who are bias towards their team".
We have different opinions on it. You are likely bias towards Boston and have seen them play more than I have, most of the comments in the other thread are from Boston fans and seem to support your view. I am likely biases towards Vancouver and have likely seen them play more than you have, most of the comments in this thread are from Vancouver fans and seem to support my opinion. Im guessing the values were debating likely fall somewhere in-between our two views.