SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New Faces Better Results

Créé par: SadSabres90
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 21 juill. 2021
Publié: 21 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
2021 NHL Draft
Pick 1, 1st Overall: Owen Power, D, Michigan
Pick 2, 9th Overall (Formerly Vancouver): Kent Johnson, C, Michigan
Pick 3, 16th Overall, (Formerly NYR): Sebastian Cossa, G, Edmonton WHL
Pick 4, 33rd Overall, Scott Morrow, D, Shattuck HS
Pick 5, 50th Overall, (Formerly Winnipeg), Shai Buium, D Sioux City USHL
Pick 6, 53rd Overall, (Formerly Boston), Matthew Knies, LW, Tri-City USHL
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 100 000 $
21 100 000 $
2975 000 $
22 100 000 $
55 750 000 $
23 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 600 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 800 000 $
24 750 000 $
11 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel [Droits de RFA]
  2. Miller, K'Andre
  3. Shesterkin, Igor [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
2.
BUF
  1. Lind, Kole [Droits de RFA]
  2. Pearson, Tanner
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Reinhart, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
3.
BUF
  1. Lundmark, Simon
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
4.
BUF
SEA
  1. Borgen, William
Détails additionnels:
Expansion Pick
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
Logo de FLA
Logo de BUF
Logo de MTL
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $63 347 250 $113 916 $1 200 000 $18 152 750 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 050 000 $3 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
889 166 $889 166 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 juill. 2021 à 1 h 0
#1
Breadman likes Bread
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,729
No thanks, huuuuuge overpay. I’m not even sure I’d do Igor for Jack, one-for-one (Shesterkin is more important to the Rangers, obviously Eichel has more value).
21 juill. 2021 à 1 h 2
#2
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
I think 9OA is untouchable. Also, losing a top 6 player for another top 6 player is not the way to go for us. Replace Pearson for Roussel or something
theleano1 a aimé ceci.
21 juill. 2021 à 1 h 14
#3
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,978
Mentions "j'aime": 4,046
Replace Pearson with Roussel and then the canucks say yes
21 juill. 2021 à 1 h 40
#4
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,725
Mentions "j'aime": 2,959
Quoting: theleano1
Replace Pearson with Roussel and then the canucks say yes

Of course they would, Roussel skates like he’s stuck to the ice now. And Because the Sabres need another overpaid Cody Eakin. At least Pearson has term and could actually do something.
21 juill. 2021 à 2 h 7
#5
Mods have power egos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,636
Mentions "j'aime": 1,262
I actually just vomited all over my floor and now I have to clean it up… thanks
21 juill. 2021 à 2 h 22
#6
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 4,978
Mentions "j'aime": 4,046
Quoting: Tjm220
Of course they would, Roussel skates like he’s stuck to the ice now. And Because the Sabres need another overpaid Cody Eakin. At least Pearson has term and could actually do something.


No point in trading a top 9 pick a b+ prospect and a top 6 forward for an average top 6 forward at that point there needs a cap dump going the other way to make this trade fair
21 juill. 2021 à 2 h 25
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 542
Mentions "j'aime": 170
That Eichel trade is one of the funniest things I’ve seen in a very long time
21 juill. 2021 à 2 h 37
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 703
Cute thinking that Igor isn't in the untouchable part of the Rangers future core. Likely not getting Miller either, one of Schneider, Robertson or Jones.
21 juill. 2021 à 8 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 330
Vancouvers is not trading the 9th OA for Sam NOhart
21 juill. 2021 à 12 h 28
#10
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,725
Mentions "j'aime": 2,959
Quoting: theleano1
No point in trading a top 9 pick a b+ prospect and a top 6 forward for an average top 6 forward at that point there needs a cap dump going the other way to make this trade fair

Average top 6 forward? Reinhart will score twice as many points as Pearson next year.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 17
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: KingLundqvist30
No thanks, huuuuuge overpay. I’m not even sure I’d do Igor for Jack, one-for-one (Shesterkin is more important to the Rangers, obviously Eichel has more value).


Last I checked the Rangers were piss poor as well and missed the playoffs....Eichel on your team would have the Rangers in the Top 4 in the Eastern Conference.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 18
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Juiceman
I think 9OA is untouchable. Also, losing a top 6 player for another top 6 player is not the way to go for us. Replace Pearson for Roussel or something


Per Elliot Freidman, Vancouver is willing to move 9 for Reinhart if the deal is right. If Pearson is a Top 6 in Vancouver then the Canucks are in worse shape than I thought. Pearson is a 3rd line forward, all you need to do is compared Reinhart to Pearson stats and is relatively lopsided.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 20
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: theleano1
Replace Pearson with Roussel and then the canucks say yes


Roussel had 1 good year, 5 years ago....we are trying to make trades that both teams find value in. Roussel is worth a bag of pucks and a couple cheap CCM wood sticks.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 22
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: theleano1
No point in trading a top 9 pick a b+ prospect and a top 6 forward for an average top 6 forward at that point there needs a cap dump going the other way to make this trade fair


Once again, if Pearson is a Top 6 in Vancouver, then the Canucks are in horrible shape. Pearson is a Top 9, maybe a 4th line on a great team. Reinhart is a 60-70pt W/C playing on one of the worst teams in hockey. Average is not a word to describe Reinhart.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 22
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: LafreNYR
That Eichel trade is one of the funniest things I’ve seen in a very long time


Funny like how bad the Rangers were last season.....
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 23
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: SadSabres90
Funny like how bad the Rangers were last season.....


All your flashy Top 3 picks have really gotten the Rangers far. Eichel on that Rangers team has you guys as a Top 4 in the East, Top 8 in the league, while producing 100+ points.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 24
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: yztnuK
Vancouvers is not trading the 9th OA for Sam NOhart


Darren Dreger and Elliot Freidman will disagree as both have reported Vancouver has discussed 9 for Reinhart in recent weeks.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 25
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: BroadwayBlueshirts
Cute thinking that Igor isn't in the untouchable part of the Rangers future core. Likely not getting Miller either, one of Schneider, Robertson or Jones.


Igor is untouchable? Were we watching the same goalie last year? The Rangers seem to have a lot of untouchables, yet found a way to suck last season.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 25
#19
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: SadSabres90
Per Elliot Freidman, Vancouver is willing to move 9 for Reinhart if the deal is right. If Pearson is a Top 6 in Vancouver then the Canucks are in worse shape than I thought. Pearson is a 3rd line forward, all you need to do is compared Reinhart to Pearson stats and is relatively lopsided.

Pointless trade now that Lind is going to Seattle
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 27
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 132
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Juiceman
Pointless trade now that Lind is going to Seattle


Buffalo would probably take Pearson, 9 and a 2022 3rd for Reinhart. Lind is an average prospect for the most part.
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 30
#21
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: SadSabres90
Buffalo would probably take Pearson, 9 and a 2022 3rd for Reinhart. Lind is an average prospect for the most part.


I want Reinhart but if we have a chance at Clarke, Hughes, or Johnson or McTavish, I’d rather keep the pick
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 30
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 542
Mentions "j'aime": 170
Quoting: SadSabres90
Funny like how bad the Rangers were last season.....


We were literally in the playoff race with Boston, Washington, Penguins and Isles until the last 2 weeks of the season with the 2nd youngest roster in the entire NHL lol
21 juill. 2021 à 19 h 31
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 542
Mentions "j'aime": 170
Quoting: SadSabres90
All your flashy Top 3 picks have really gotten the Rangers far. Eichel on that Rangers team has you guys as a Top 4 in the East, Top 8 in the league, while producing 100+ points.


Enjoy Buchnevich Chytil Jones and our 1st. All fan favorites at least!
22 juill. 2021 à 16 h 23
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,261
Mentions "j'aime": 703
Quoting: SadSabres90
Igor is untouchable? Were we watching the same goalie last year? The Rangers seem to have a lot of untouchables, yet found a way to suck last season.


.919 from February to May. Not gonna list the jawdropping stats from the KHL and AHL/NHL last season. He's still the goalie of the future. And funny, for a team that sucked, they were the best non-playoff team, as the youngest team in the league. But go off on how they suck!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage