SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks Fantasy Retool V1

Créé par: bkuchler23
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 juill. 2021
Publié: 17 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
assuming Brett Connolly picked by SEA. Maybe too overgenerous on Seth Jones trade. Contract values based on Evolving Hockey's projections
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 537 000 $
23 310 000 $
21 032 000 $
21 802 000 $
21 123 000 $
22 892 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 500 000 $
11 100 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Jones, Seth
  2. Laine, Patrik [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
  1. Nylander, Alexander [Droits de RFA]
  2. Strome, Dylan
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
2022 2nd becomes 2022 1st if CHI makes Second Round of Stanley Cup Playoffs.
2.
CHI
SEA
  1. Connolly, Brett
Détails additionnels:
Expansion Draft
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (COL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de NYI
Logo de COL
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2681 500 000 $69 146 881 $452 439 $5 115 000 $12 353 119 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
4 537 000 $4 537 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 310 000 $3 310 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 032 000 $1 032 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 123 000 $1 123 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 802 000 $1 802 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 892 000 $2 892 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juill. 2021 à 21 h 9
#1
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
wait you think too OVERgenerous on the columbus trade?
Friendly_Cannon a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 21 h 12
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
laugh laugh Overgenerous doubtful that gets you Seth jones let alone adding Laine to the deal. Laine's qualifying offer is 1 x $7,500,000 you can't pay him less.
Friendly_Cannon a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 21 h 46
#3
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,633
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
Why is Zadorov taking a pay cut when he clearly wants $4.5-$5M?
17 juill. 2021 à 22 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 3,768
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
That cbj trade is horrendous. I wouldn’t trade Jones alone for that. Dach for bemstrom should be more than fair then.
18 juill. 2021 à 1 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,039
Mentions "j'aime": 369
Quoting: The_Cannon
That cbj trade is horrendous. I wouldn’t trade Jones alone for that. Dach for bemstrom should be more than fair then.


Less obnoxious then Debrincat, Dach, 1st for one year rental Jones
18 juill. 2021 à 10 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 3,768
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Quoting: Breadmanhawks
Less obnoxious then Debrincat, Dach, 1st for one year rental Jones


Well obviously but it wouldn’t be for a rental. He’d sign an extension. Both trades are equally bad.
18 juill. 2021 à 12 h 13
#7
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,026
Mentions "j'aime": 408
That CBJ trade is asinine, come on man...
Friendly_Cannon a aimé ceci.
18 juill. 2021 à 14 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,039
Mentions "j'aime": 369
Quoting: The_Cannon
Well obviously but it wouldn’t be for a rental. He’d sign an extension. Both trades are equally bad.


He only is going to sign an extension with a team that he wants to go to which is why columbus has no leverage
18 juill. 2021 à 14 h 39
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 3,768
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Quoting: Breadmanhawks
He only is going to sign an extension with a team that he wants to go to which is why columbus has no leverage


So we don’t have any leverage, except we don’t need to trade him only to those teams. But those who want to have him extended, will have a bidding war. Dallas, Chicago, Colorado are all teams he’d be interested in extending with with others still unknown.
So you think we’re gonna get pennies on the dollar for him? I’d argue not. Anyone who thinks dach is getting moved for him is kidding themselves, however thinking we have no leverage what so ever, is also kidding themselves. Anyone who is trading for Jones thinks he is a top pairing/ top defenseman. The price will be very high as has been reported. Just not a package around a future 1c ++.

This trade isn’t that. Not even close. You don’t get laine or jones for this trade. It is more outrageous than the dach++ trades. This isn’t nhl 21 where Alex nylander is still a medium elite. He’s exposed to be taken and likely won’t be.
18 juill. 2021 à 16 h 51
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,039
Mentions "j'aime": 369
Quoting: The_Cannon
So we don’t have any leverage, except we don’t need to trade him only to those teams. But those who want to have him extended, will have a bidding war. Dallas, Chicago, Colorado are all teams he’d be interested in extending with with others still unknown.
So you think we’re gonna get pennies on the dollar for him? I’d argue not. Anyone who thinks dach is getting moved for him is kidding themselves, however thinking we have no leverage what so ever, is also kidding themselves. Anyone who is trading for Jones thinks he is a top pairing/ top defenseman. The price will be very high as has been reported. Just not a package around a future 1c ++.

This trade isn’t that. Not even close. You don’t get laine or jones for this trade. It is more outrageous than the dach++ trades. This isn’t nhl 21 where Alex nylander is still a medium elite. He’s exposed to be taken and likely won’t be.


As a hawks fan, I’d rather not even have Laine because he’s really not worth the absurd contract he’s going to ask for. As for Jones, keep him if you want. There’s no point in the Hawks trading a ton of prospects for him. Like the most I can see is Strome, Beaudin, and a 1st and that’s with an extension. I can understand CBJ not wanting that but like it is what it is. Maybe Boqvist and Strome. I get that I’m basing this off potential but like that’s really all I’d feel comfortable trading.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage