SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TSN "insider"

Créé par: MattyMadden28
Équipe: 2016-17 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 9 févr. 2017
Publié: 9 févr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Wtf is wrong with TSN. If they like this trade we should trade them Carrick for rakell.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2018
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2673 000 000 $71 675 333 $512 000 $4 915 000 $1 324 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 2
686 667 $686 667 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
612 500 $612 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 3
675 000 $675 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 févr. 2017 à 16 h 53
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,068
Mentions "j'aime": 22,464
In a crowded news market, everyone has to be an insider to show they are smarter than every one else.
9 févr. 2017 à 16 h 54
#2
VegasGMV2.LeafsGMV1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,918
Mentions "j'aime": 177
That would be a brutal trade...
9 févr. 2017 à 17 h 9
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 274
Mentions "j'aime": 12
People are rating you 1 star without looking at your description
9 févr. 2017 à 17 h 19
#4
NateElder12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 5,736
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: gunshot125
People are rating you 1 star without looking at your description


haha that's because if a deal is bad people can't help themselves but to give it a 1 instead of maybe a 2 or 3 which I use if a trade is halfway there. But yes nobody read what you said and that's happened to me too when i try to start discussions and I get instant 1 stars.
9 févr. 2017 à 17 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 570
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Having listened to that conversation they never said the Leafs should make that trade, they said that would be the cost. If you want a good, young puck moving RD you need to give up a good, young controlable forward in return and until Kapanen shows his NHL potential in the NHL, he's not going to cut it. Nylander is the cheapest price to pay to get that kind of quality on the back end.

That being said, if they make that trade I'm becoming a Habs fan.
9 févr. 2017 à 17 h 54
#6
Démarrer sujet
VeryLeafy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 678
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: Canadian_Rednek
Having listened to that conversation they never said the Leafs should make that trade, they said that would be the cost. If you want a good, young puck moving RD you need to give up a good, young controlable forward in return and until Kapanen shows his NHL potential in the NHL, he's not going to cut it. Nylander is the cheapest price to pay to get that kind of quality on the back end.

That being said, if they make that trade I'm becoming a Habs fan.
. But speculating that it would take a proven 20year old 60pt type player for an UNPROVEN 22 year old RHD doesnt make any sense. Even If Montour played half a season and put up great numbers I still wouldn't do that trade. He is basically Carrick. And Carrick is a PROVEN NHL Dman. And remember that we got Carrick and a pick and a cap dump for a middle six grinder. Lol. Now that Carrick is proven his value should go up. Would they trade Carrick for Drouin? That's how dumb this trade idea is. Lol. Nylander for lindholm I could see. That's about it.
9 févr. 2017 à 18 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 570
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: MattyMadden28
Quoting: Canadian_Rednek
Having listened to that conversation they never said the Leafs should make that trade, they said that would be the cost. If you want a good, young puck moving RD you need to give up a good, young controlable forward in return and until Kapanen shows his NHL potential in the NHL, he's not going to cut it. Nylander is the cheapest price to pay to get that kind of quality on the back end.

That being said, if they make that trade I'm becoming a Habs fan.
. But speculating that it would take a proven 20year old 60pt type player for an UNPROVEN 22 year old RHD doesnt make any sense. Even If Montour played half a season and put up great numbers I still wouldn't do that trade. He is basically Carrick. And Carrick is a PROVEN NHL Dman. And remember that we got Carrick and a pick and a cap dump for a middle six grinder. Lol. Now that Carrick is proven his value should go up. Would they trade Carrick for Drouin? That's how dumb this trade idea is. Lol. Nylander for lindholm I could see. That's about it.


That's not giving Montour credit. He hasn't made the Anaheim lineup because they can't fit him into it. He's significantly better than Carrick. He's easily a top 4 dman right now on Toronto and Carrick is at best a 3rd pairing dman on any other team. But all that aside, it's extremely hard to find a good, young, puck moving RD right now and you need to be willing to take a gamble to acquire outside the draft. I would not make theverything trade either I'm just reinforcing TSN's point that they cost a lot; more than Toronto is probably willing to give up.
9 févr. 2017 à 18 h 56
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 910
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Though Montour hasn't cracked the lineup and he has shown how he can play in about a handful of games this year. I would rather give up Sami Vatanen over Montour. We clear cap space and can add a winger for next year and have a long run next year. Nylander would fit in nicely with Max Jones and Sam Steel. Just my opinion on it. We have the luxury of having 4-5 right shot D-man and the asking price is a little steep.
9 févr. 2017 à 19 h 21
#9
Démarrer sujet
VeryLeafy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 678
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: Canadian_Rednek
Quoting: MattyMadden28
. But speculating that it would take a proven 20year old 60pt type player for an UNPROVEN 22 year old RHD doesnt make any sense. Even If Montour played half a season and put up great numbers I still wouldn't do that trade. He is basically Carrick. And Carrick is a PROVEN NHL Dman. And remember that we got Carrick and a pick and a cap dump for a middle six grinder. Lol. Now that Carrick is proven his value should go up. Would they trade Carrick for Drouin? That's how dumb this trade idea is. Lol. Nylander for lindholm I could see. That's about it.


That's not giving Montour credit. He hasn't made the Anaheim lineup because they can't fit him into it. He's significantly better than Carrick. He's easily a top 4 dman right now on Toronto and Carrick is at best a 3rd pairing dman on any other team. But all that aside, it's extremely hard to find a good, young, puck moving RD right now and you need to be willing to take a gamble to acquire outside the draft. I would not make theverything trade either I'm just reinforcing TSN's point that they cost a lot; more than Toronto is probably willing to give up.
.

I don't get it though. Carrick and Montour are the age and Carrick has played 100 games or so. I'm not saying Montour couldn't make the team. I'm saying he didn't and he hasn't done anything to sow he can play at the NHL level. His trade value would be like a Kapanen. Who could also be like Nylander but we don't know yet. Nylander is 20 and producing well. Would Winnipeg trade an Elhers for Montour if they needed a rd. no. Even if you think Carrick is much worse then Montour (which there is no evidence of ) he is at best worth a similar prospect at a similar value which is more of a Kapanen then Nylander.
9 févr. 2017 à 19 h 34
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,068
Mentions "j'aime": 22,464
Leafs have their own AHL prospects. Yes Montour might be a late bloomer (think Parayko) but the Leafs if they really want to improve their defence it will be for an established Dman. And Nylander might be the Leafs # 2 centre of the future.
9 févr. 2017 à 19 h 54
#11
NBABound
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 1,392
Quoting: MattyMadden28
Quoting: Canadian_Rednek
Having listened to that conversation they never said the Leafs should make that trade, they said that would be the cost. If you want a good, young puck moving RD you need to give up a good, young controlable forward in return and until Kapanen shows his NHL potential in the NHL, he's not going to cut it. Nylander is the cheapest price to pay to get that kind of quality on the back end.

That being said, if they make that trade I'm becoming a Habs fan.
. But speculating that it would take a proven 20year old 60pt type player for an UNPROVEN 22 year old RHD doesnt make any sense. Even If Montour played half a season and put up great numbers I still wouldn't do that trade. He is basically Carrick. And Carrick is a PROVEN NHL Dman. And remember that we got Carrick and a pick and a cap dump for a middle six grinder. Lol. Now that Carrick is proven his value should go up. Would they trade Carrick for Drouin? That's how dumb this trade idea is. Lol. Nylander for lindholm I could see. That's about it.
Montour is soooo much better than Carrick. I've seen him play and he's a really good puck moving D but also very sturdy in the backend.
10 févr. 2017 à 9 h 40
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Dreger said that Anaheim would most likely ask for Nylander. The "ask" versus what they actually got would be quite different. The argument could be made that Leivo is in the same position as Montour, a victim of numbers, and that he would actually be the most probable piece the Ducks could get.
The Ducks ask for Nylander, the Leafs offer Soshnikov, they settle on Leivo.
11 févr. 2017 à 9 h 48
#13
Démarrer sujet
VeryLeafy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 678
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Id do that. Basically I was upset and confused by TSNs brutal take on what it would take. Because that insinuates they believe it to fair and creditable. It's just roasting leaf fans. If they said "leafs need D help and the Ducks have what they need. Good young D. Im sure the Ducks really like these young players and would want a lot for them. There initial ask mat start with m Nylander. But as Nylander has been a super rookie and there is no way leafs management would trade a proving 20yo for anything but Proven young D man with similar upside plus. Leafs are winning enough games to stay the course and part of there electric nightly offense is generated by these young Leafs players and if I'm a Rival gm looking to make a trade for Nylander, I know it's going to take a lot". That's what the context should be. That's the obvious truth. Not this ****.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage