SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

MattyLandyJamie

Créé par: AyAyRon
Équipe: 2021-22 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 14 juill. 2021
Publié: 14 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
According to published reports...
Calgary MAY have interest in Tarasenko, Dunn, & a pick or prospect for Tkachuk, but Tarasenko won't go to Calgary.
Washington would do Kuznetsov-for-Tarasenko straight up, so do that, then send Kuznetsov (800k retained to match salary), Dunn, & 2nd next year for Matthew Tkachuk.
Blues reportedly have major interest in Landeskog if he becomes UFA.
Seattle won't take Scandella willingly, so Blues add Sanford as a sweetner.
Oleksiak is a monster who thrives with puck-moving D partners, like Parayko.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 500 000 $
2900 000 $
2750 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 500 000 $
43 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Dunn, Vince [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kuznetsov, Evgeny (800 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (STL)
3.
STL
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de DET
2022
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 032 182 $306 349 $425 000 $7 467 818 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 8
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
787 500 $787 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juill. 2021 à 22 h 54
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,241
Mentions "j'aime": 10,584
Flames laugh. We have no need/want for Kuzy
flamesfan a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 23 h 4
#2
Always have 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 1,989
Mentions "j'aime": 921
I know the caps called about tarasenko but I do not see a fit in a Kuzy trade. I think STL would need to add
14 juill. 2021 à 23 h 5
#3
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
If Tarasenko won't go to Calgary, neither would Kuznetsov.

If the Flames inquire on Tarasenko it would likely be for Monahan. Something like that.
flamesfan et Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 23 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,217
Mentions "j'aime": 19,489
Lol what? how does swapping Tank with Kuzy make Calgary any more likely to make a horrible trade?
flamesfan et Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 23 h 12
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Good luck outbidding other teams for Gabriel Landeskogs service. Calgary declines and doubtful Caps can do the Tarasenko deal.
flamesfan et Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 23 h 28
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Flames very easily decline that garbage trade, the flames have said many many times tkachuk is untouchable
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2021 à 0 h 8
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 1,103
Mentions "j'aime": 341
Drop the MT trade. Sign landeskog and trade Tarasenko for someone who can play second line winger (i.e. Smith from Vegas or someone from the East). Dunn will get a 1st from DET or NJD
15 juill. 2021 à 2 h 37
#8
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,090
Mentions "j'aime": 2,258
Yeah no the caps absolutely would not do one for one for Tarasenko.
15 juill. 2021 à 9 h 46
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: flamesfan
Flames very easily decline that garbage trade, the flames have said many many times tkachuk is untouchable


Point to one quote that says he's untouchable.

Here's one direct from Treliving :

I’m certainly open to exploring any avenue available to make our team better. We didn’t meet the expectations we had of our team, so we’ve got to look at how we can make it better.”
15 juill. 2021 à 10 h 6
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: brady_t12
Yeah no the caps absolutely would not do one for one for Tarasenko.


"The Capitals are also a possibility for Tarasenko, with the rumored one-for-one swap for Evgeny Kuznetsov being the Caps’ preferred choice. "

I didn't make it up. Jeremy Rutherford got it from someone he believes, & he doesn't just throw random stuff against the wall.
15 juill. 2021 à 10 h 9
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lol what? how does swapping Tank with Kuzy make Calgary any more likely to make a horrible trade?


Because Kuznetsov is a better center than Monahan, who could/should also be moved.
15 juill. 2021 à 10 h 10
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: ItWasIn
If Tarasenko won't go to Calgary, neither would Kuznetsov.

If the Flames inquire on Tarasenko it would likely be for Monahan. Something like that.


How could you know that? He only has a 15 team no trade. That's 16 possibilities. Tarasenko has a full no trade. He gets to choose
15 juill. 2021 à 10 h 12
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,217
Mentions "j'aime": 19,489
Quoting: AyAyRon
Because Kuznetsov is a better center than Monahan, who could/should also be moved.


And Kuzy being slightly better than Monahan makes Calgary consider this awful trade why?
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 18
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
And Kuzy being slightly better than Monahan makes Calgary consider this awful trade why?


Kuznetsov & Monahan both hit the NHL in 13‐14. Since then, they've played 520 games & 591 games, respectively. Here's how they rank for centers (min. 400 GP)

Pts/60 :
EK - 7th (2.21, tied w/ Tavares, just behind Mackinnon)
SM - 30th (1.87, between JT Miller & William Karlsson)

Assists/60
EK - 2nd (1.55, only McJesus is better)
SM - 54th ( 1.00, just ahead of Carl Soderberg)


On-Ice GF%
EK - 6th (57.6, just ahead of Crosby)
SM - 56th (50.4, just ahead of Bryan Little)

Monahan is 2 yrs younger, but also a UFA in 2 yrs. Kuznetsov is signed for 4 more years, and in my trade StL retained 800k in salary to balance things out.

Point is, maybe you don't like the deal, but let's not pretend Kuznetsov isn't a real upgrade over Monahan.
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 27
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,217
Mentions "j'aime": 19,489
Quoting: AyAyRon
Kuznetsov & Monahan both hit the NHL in 13‐14. Since then, they've played 520 games & 591 games, respectively. Here's how they rank for centers (min. 400 GP)

Pts/60 :
EK - 7th (2.21, tied w/ Tavares, just behind Mackinnon)
SM - 30th (1.87, between JT Miller & William Karlsson)

Assists/60
EK - 2nd (1.55, only McJesus is better)
SM - 54th ( 1.00, just ahead of Carl Soderberg)


On-Ice GF%
EK - 6th (57.6, just ahead of Crosby)
SM - 56th (50.4, just ahead of Bryan Little)

Monahan is 2 yrs younger, but also a UFA in 2 yrs. Kuznetsov is signed for 4 more years, and in my trade StL retained 800k in salary to balance things out.

Point is, maybe you don't like the deal, but let's not pretend Kuznetsov isn't a real upgrade over Monahan.


I like how you ignore goals/60 here

Not to mention Kuzy's massive character issues is the last thing Calgary needs
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 47
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I like how you ignore goals/60 here

Not to mention Kuzy's massive character issues is the last thing Calgary needs


I didn't ignore Goals. Monahan is 14th, Kuznetsov is 53rd. A center's responsibility leans more towards puck distribution, (unless you're on the level of Crosby, Mackinnon, McDavid, etc.) though, so setting up teammates tends to be a greater indicator of value there.
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 59
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,217
Mentions "j'aime": 19,489
Quoting: AyAyRon
I didn't ignore Goals. Monahan is 14th, Kuznetsov is 53rd. A center's responsibility leans more towards puck distribution, (unless you're on the level of Crosby, Mackinnon, McDavid, etc.) though, so setting up teammates tends to be a greater indicator of value there.


That doesn't make any sense, a center's responsibility is to play to their strengths, if a center is a natural goal scorer then they play in a way that allows them to score goals. Don't see anyone complaining about Point, Matthews, or Pettersson's style
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 59
#18
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,090
Mentions "j'aime": 2,258
Quoting: AyAyRon
"The Capitals are also a possibility for Tarasenko, with the rumored one-for-one swap for Evgeny Kuznetsov being the Caps’ preferred choice. "

I didn't make it up. Jeremy Rutherford got it from someone he believes, & he doesn't just throw random stuff against the wall.


Didn’t say you made it up. I said it was an awful trade. My point still stands.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 16
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
That doesn't make any sense, a center's responsibility is to play to their strengths, if a center is a natural goal scorer then they play in a way that allows them to score goals. Don't see anyone complaining about Point, Matthews, or Pettersson's style


Because their style leans to distribution. They're all 3 better than Kuznetsov or Monahan. All have more A/60 than G/60, but they're such talented players, that there's not much separation between the stats. Point has nearly as many PRIMARY assists/60 has he does G/60. Pettersson actually has MORE primary assists than goals. Matthews is a unique case, because he shoots more, but he has Marner feeding him who's a pass-1st winger.

Much more often than not, the center is the distributor.

Go look at the list of goal scoring leaders. Almost to a man, they've got more goals than primary assists.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 18
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: brady_t12
Didn’t say you made it up. I said it was an awful trade. My point still stands.


No, you said Caps would not do 1‐for-1. Regardless if you think it's terrible or not, MY point stands that someone put it out there that they would do it.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 35
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,217
Mentions "j'aime": 19,489
Quoting: AyAyRon
Because their style leans to distribution. They're all 3 better than Kuznetsov or Monahan. All have more A/60 than G/60, but they're such talented players, that there's not much separation between the stats. Point has nearly as many PRIMARY assists/60 has he does G/60. Pettersson actually has MORE primary assists than goals. Matthews is a unique case, because he shoots more, but he has Marner feeding him who's a pass-1st winger.

Much more often than not, the center is the distributor.

Go look at the list of goal scoring leaders. Almost to a man, they've got more goals than primary assists.


Ok and what about Seguin and Pavelski, both are known goal scoring centers. Also as for Matthews having Marner, is that not at least somewhat similar to Monahan having Gaudreau? Or Zibanejad having Panarin?

A center's duty isn't to distribute the puck
15 juill. 2021 à 13 h 18
#22
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,539
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: AyAyRon
How could you know that? He only has a 15 team no trade. That's 16 possibilities. Tarasenko has a full no trade. He gets to choose


How many Russian players are on the Flames? How many Russian players have played for the Flames in the past decade?

Most players don’t want to play in Canada, that’s just a fact. There’s a very high chance neither wants to go to Calgary
15 juill. 2021 à 13 h 31
#23
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,090
Mentions "j'aime": 2,258
Quoting: AyAyRon
No, you said Caps would not do 1‐for-1. Regardless if you think it's terrible or not, MY point stands that someone put it out there that they would do it.


Buddy, you said that I said you made it up lmao. I never said you made it up. And no, the capitals are not going to trade Kuznetsov for Tarasenko one for one because some idiot reporter said so. It’s a terrible trade for the caps. That’s why they won’t do it. We don’t need a winger. We need a center coming back. And we’re likely not trading Kuznetsov anyway so it doesn’t even matter.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage