SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trying To Fit In A Center

Créé par: CowSaysMoo
Équipe: 2021-22 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 14 juill. 2021
Publié: 14 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
47 000 000 $
1971 250 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
22 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
SEA
  1. Soucy, Carson
Détails additionnels:
Expansion Draft
2.
BUF
  1. Boldy, Matthew
  2. Fiala, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
  3. Johansson, Filip [Liste de réserve]
  4. Rask, Victor
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 521 505 $0 $215 000 $7 978 495 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
894 167 $894 167 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
825 833 $825 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
971 250 $971 250 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
800 000 $800 000 $
D
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juill. 2021 à 17 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,117
Mentions "j'aime": 459
Yeah, I agree. I think if we're going to fit in Eichel we have to let Fiala go. We're not going to trade Dumba now and go from 4 top D down to 2 top D in one off-season.
14 juill. 2021 à 17 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 76
Mentions "j'aime": 30
I don't envy the Wild... if you look at the long-term outlook of your team next year when the buyouts of suter and parise rise, the Wild don't have enough cap space to cover those. And that's with Greenway and Kakkonen as RFA... rough.

Such a strange decision to buy out Suter. Wouldn't the Wild just be better off keeping him instead of having to sign someone like McCabe?
CowSaysMoo et Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 17 h 32
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 331
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
Yeah, I agree. I think if we're going to fit in Eichel we have to let Fiala go. We're not going to trade Dumba now and go from 4 top D down to 2 top D in one off-season.


Absolutely. There is no way to keep Fiala if Eichel is here. Bill can't bank on the salary cap increasing by much in years 2-4 of the buyouts. If Fiala isn't included in the Eichel trade, then another trade would have to be made for a cheap young player or futures.

Dumba is here to stay...for now. I agree there is no way they go into next season without four top-6 defensemen from last season (Dumba, Suter, Cole, Soucy). They will have to address the situation again because he only has two years left until unrestricted free agency and will command a raise. They might not be able to afford him.
Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 17 h 33
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 331
Quoting: Jphaxx
I don't envy the Wild... if you look at the long-term outlook of your team next year when the buyouts of suter and parise rise, the Wild don't have enough cap space to cover those. And that's with Greenway and Kakkonen as RFA... rough.

Such a strange decision to buy out Suter. Wouldn't the Wild just be better off keeping him instead of having to sign someone like McCabe?


Players on entry-level deals will make or break the WIld in the next four seasons.
Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 17 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,631
Mentions "j'aime": 1,891
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
Yeah, I agree. I think if we're going to fit in Eichel we have to let Fiala go. We're not going to trade Dumba now and go from 4 top D down to 2 top D in one off-season.


Quoting: CowSaysMoo
Absolutely. There is no way to keep Fiala if Eichel is here. Bill can't bank on the salary cap increasing by much in years 2-4 of the buyouts. If Fiala isn't included in the Eichel trade, then another trade would have to be made for a cheap young player or futures.

Dumba is here to stay...for now. I agree there is no way they go into next season without four top-6 defensemen from last season (Dumba, Suter, Cole, Soucy). They will have to address the situation again because he only has two years left until unrestricted free agency and will command a raise. They might not be able to afford him.


Well we’d have the cap for Fiala and Eichel this coming year. Then Zucc can be moved next summer. If you can get Fiala for 6M, I think it’s worth it to keep him around. You might have to pay a bit to move Zucc, but IMO it would be worth it to keep Fiala.
14 juill. 2021 à 17 h 54
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,117
Mentions "j'aime": 459
Quoting: CowSaysMoo
Absolutely. There is no way to keep Fiala if Eichel is here. Bill can't bank on the salary cap increasing by much in years 2-4 of the buyouts. If Fiala isn't included in the Eichel trade, then another trade would have to be made for a cheap young player or futures.

Dumba is here to stay...for now. I agree there is no way they go into next season without four top-6 defensemen from last season (Dumba, Suter, Cole, Soucy). They will have to address the situation again because he only has two years left until unrestricted free agency and will command a raise. They might not be able to afford him.


They definitely can't afford Dumba's next contact either way.
14 juill. 2021 à 17 h 55
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,117
Mentions "j'aime": 459
Quoting: drmantalban
Well we’d have the cap for Fiala and Eichel this coming year. Then Zucc can be moved next summer. If you can get Fiala for 6M, I think it’s worth it to keep him around. You might have to pay a bit to move Zucc, but IMO it would be worth it to keep Fiala.


Isn't it a 10 team NTC for Zuccarello next year? He might be able to block alot of our trading partners.
14 juill. 2021 à 17 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,631
Mentions "j'aime": 1,891
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
Isn't it a 10 team NTC for Zuccarello next year? He might be able to block alot of our trading partners.


Right it’s next summer, that’s my point. You’d have the room this coming year due to the buyouts but you’d need to ditch Zucc after. He could block some, but he’d be moveable. Not enough of a barrier to just surrender on Fiala IMO
Wildwinswhen et CowSaysMoo a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 18 h 0
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,117
Mentions "j'aime": 459
Quoting: drmantalban
Right it’s next summer, that’s my point. You’d have the room this coming year due to the buyouts but you’d need to ditch Zucc after. He could block some, but he’d be moveable. Not enough of a barrier to just surrender on Fiala IMO


I hope we can keep Fiala. But this is why I could never be a real GM. That was such a strong move by BG. I'm just waiting for what's next.
MNCountryClub a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 18 h 3
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 557
Mentions "j'aime": 331
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
I hope we can keep Fiala. But this is why I could never be a real GM. That was such a strong move by BG. I'm just waiting for what's next.


What’s next could be even bigger than what transpired yesterday. Bill wouldn’t pull off something like that if he wasn’t planning other big moves.
Wildwinswhen et MNCountryClub a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2021 à 18 h 4
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,631
Mentions "j'aime": 1,891
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
I hope we can keep Fiala. But this is why I could never be a real GM. That was such a strong move by BG. I'm just waiting for what's next.


Lol well I sure as heck couldn’t either. It was a stunner of a move.

It definitely wouldn’t be easy to keep Fiala and bring in Eichel, but I think if you assume that you can dump Zucc the following year, it at least becomes possible. Bottom 6 would need to be very cheap plugs though.
Wildwinswhen a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage