SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Something unexpected is gonna happen

Créé par: GirouxCrew
Équipe: 2021-22 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2021
Publié: 13 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
65 250 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
54 500 000 $
34 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
    Expansion Draft
    2.
    3.
    4.
    PHI
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
    SEA
    1. Gostisbehere, Shayne (2 000 000 $ retained)
    5.
    TBL
    1. Aubé-Kubel, Nicolas
    2. Braun, Justin
    3. Frost, Morgan
    4. Myers, Philippe
    5. Ratcliffe, Isaac
    6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
    Détails additionnels:
    TB sheds much needed salary, gets quality young replacements, replacement experience on the blue line for losing mcdonagh and some grit/energy for the bottom 6 for losing one or both of barclay/goodrow
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    2022
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de STL
    2023
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de PHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $66 361 428 $0 $1 950 000 $15 138 572 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
    AD, C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    G
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 4
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 juill. 2021 à 21 h 17
    #1
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,465
    Actually value wise, I like the trades. But McDonagh's NTC kills that deal. That's too much term for Larsson IMO
    GirouxCrew a aimé ceci.
    13 juill. 2021 à 21 h 23
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 281
    Mentions "j'aime": 86
    Quoting: palhal
    Actually value wise, I like the trades. But McDonagh's NTC kills that deal. That's too much term for Larsson IMO

    My guess is Larsson is offered quite a few 4x4 so someone is going to offer more. Flyers are desperate to be better defensively so I wouldn’t be shocked to see them be the ones to overpay. As for McDonagh, there’s so many guys with clauses, they’re gonna have to convince someone to go. Since he has 2 cups now he might be more willing
    13 juill. 2021 à 21 h 26
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 10,386
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,880
    I like the idea behind the Coyotes deal. I'd rather try to just do Soderstrom for Sanhiem straight up but that's a really interesting deal that is pretty fair on both sides.

    I don't really wanna touch Larsson but everything else is pretty solid. The Lightning deal I'd do that in a heartbeat.
    GirouxCrew a aimé ceci.
    13 juill. 2021 à 21 h 30
    #4
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,465
    Quoting: GirouxCrew
    My guess is Larsson is offered quite a few 4x4 so someone is going to offer more. Flyers are desperate to be better defensively so I wouldn’t be shocked to see them be the ones to overpay. As for McDonagh, there’s so many guys with clauses, someone they’re gonna have to convince someone to go. Since he has 2 cups now he might be more willing


    Sorry I disagree with your McDonagh logic. He is more motivated to stay in Tampa more than ever. Johnson, McDonagh, Gourde, Stamkos, Kutcherov, Valiesky have no motivation to waive their trade clauses.
    Killorn and Palat have M NTCs are the most logical to go. And I don't know why there are so many don't want to put Sergachev or another good young player with cap on the trading block...if needed.
    GirouxCrew a aimé ceci.
    13 juill. 2021 à 21 h 51
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 281
    Mentions "j'aime": 86
    Quoting: palhal
    Sorry I disagree with your McDonagh logic. He is more motivated to stay in Tampa more than ever. Johnson, McDonagh, Gourde, Stamkos, Kutcherov, Valiesky have no motivation to waive their trade clauses.
    Killorn and Palat have M NTCs are the most logical to go. And I don't know why there are so many don't want to put Sergachev or another good young player with cap on the trading block...if needed.


    Well if TB is 18 mil over the cap, even if they traded mcdonagh, cirelli, Killorn and Palat that’s almost 21.5 million. And that’s with taking no salary back. They’re gonna have to make a lot of moves. I think that’s also where the stamkos talk is coming from. They have a lot of work to do. And who knows who Seattle is going to take from them and how much relief they get from that alone. It will be interesting for sure
    palhal a aimé ceci.
    13 juill. 2021 à 23 h 8
    #6
    Drumman44
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 695
    Mentions "j'aime": 259
    What would you want from the Blackhawks for Voracek? We have protection space
    14 juill. 2021 à 5 h 31
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 281
    Mentions "j'aime": 86
    Quoting: DrumMan44
    What would you want from the Blackhawks for Voracek? We have protection space


    Idk what deal would make sense between them but the list of players I’d be interested in from the blackhawks are: Kane, Kubalik, Strome, Debrincat, Boqvist, Dach, Murphy and Reichel. Any of those you’d be willing to part with?
    14 juill. 2021 à 10 h 41
    #8
    Drumman44
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 695
    Mentions "j'aime": 259
    Quoting: GirouxCrew
    Idk what deal would make sense between them but the list of players I’d be interested in from the blackhawks are: Kane, Kubalik, Strome, Debrincat, Boqvist, Dach, Murphy and Reichel. Any of those you’d be willing to part with?


    I mean no but you have him going to Seattle for nothing. Figured you'd be interested in getting some value back. I know I would
    14 juill. 2021 à 12 h 25
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 281
    Mentions "j'aime": 86
    Quoting: DrumMan44
    I mean no but you have him going to Seattle for nothing. Figured you'd be interested in getting some value back. I know I would


    You don’t want to take something back just for the sake of taking something back. Will it be a challenge to replace Voraceks production? Sure. But I would rather lose him and get only cap space in return than take back a contract and a player that we don’t think fits the team and the direction they want to go. 8+ million in cap space is an extremely valuable asset in and of itself
    14 juill. 2021 à 12 h 26
    #10
    Drumman44
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 695
    Mentions "j'aime": 259
    Quoting: GirouxCrew
    You don’t want to take something back just for the sake of taking something back. Will it be a challenge to replace Voraceks production? Sure. But I would rather lose him and get only cap space in return than take back a contract and a player that we don’t think fits the team and the direction they want to go. 8+ million in cap space is an extremely valuable asset in and of itself


    Okay then take draft picks and prospects?
    14 juill. 2021 à 13 h 15
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 281
    Mentions "j'aime": 86
    Quoting: DrumMan44
    Okay then take draft picks and prospects?


    Ok what do you propose is adequate value? Normally when Jake or JVR is mentioned in trade proposals it’s usually taking a contract back ( usually a bad one) or as a throw in as part of a bigger trade to make the dollars work.
    Nonetheless, I would most definitely take back picks and prospects for Jake. I just don’t know enough about your prospects to have a preference other than the one guy I mentioned
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage