SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

All in

Créé par: Traptor
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2021
Publié: 13 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
1750 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
11 750 000 $
1900 000 $
68 000 000 $
33 250 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
2.
CGY
  1. Bemström, Emil
  2. Peeke, Andrew [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 412 500 $0 $850 000 $7 087 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juill. 2021 à 10 h 43
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Arizona declines IMO
13 juill. 2021 à 10 h 47
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Gmonwy
Arizona declines IMO


Value is off or it's not what they need?

I feel like Arizona needs to start from scratch so a package of picks gets the ball rolling.
Value-wise I think it is close. The third could be changed to a second. It is better value than we are getting for Monahan since the first is 12th vs 24th.

Another package I would consider would be around one of our young players/prospects and a second (dube/zary/pelt + 2nd)
13 juill. 2021 à 11 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 741
Mentions "j'aime": 297
Quoting: Gmonwy
Arizona declines IMO


Really? Thats a pretty high pick.
Traptor a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2021 à 11 h 1
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,449
Mentions "j'aime": 2,962
We still do not want Monahan. Certainly not for a 1st and our only NHL-ready RD prospect.
13 juill. 2021 à 11 h 16
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Viqsi
We still do not want Monahan. Certainly not for a 1st and our only NHL-ready RD prospect.


That's like... your opinion man...

I can understand not wanting to give up your only RD ready prospect. Could remove him and ruzizka but I would want a small add from CBJ.
I think a late first and a middle 6 forward for a 26 year old top 6C on contract is a steal personally.

This trade doesn't even have to be with Columbus. I just wanted a decent cheap young middle 6 forward and a late first, or something equivalent, to make this roster work. Columbus has picks to spare and desperately needs a top 6 C.
13 juill. 2021 à 11 h 37
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 530
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: MyBaby
Value is off or it's not what they need?

I feel like Arizona needs to start from scratch so a package of picks gets the ball rolling.
Value-wise I think it is close. The third could be changed to a second. It is better value than we are getting for Monahan since the first is 12th vs 24th.

Another package I would consider would be around one of our young players/prospects and a second (dube/zary/pelt + 2nd)


I'll try to chime in as a Coyotes fan. I agree with everything that you said. The value makes it hard to say no and they need picks, as well as having said they are going into a rebuild/retool. He is also on the verge of not fitting the age range and has a lot of value. But at the same time he is still rather young and signed to a great contract and is by fair Arizona's most reliable center and their depth at the center position is really bad, making it quite difficult to move him, hence why one poster maybe said we would decline. Another reason could be that Arizona's beat writer yesterday said that Dvorak may be our best chance at getting a top 4 RHD and perhaps in this case that could be our preferred target in any trade for him, while our other trade baits will most likely be for picks and futures, as you said. A long answer without a definitive answer, but I think we are in a peculiar place with him.
13 juill. 2021 à 11 h 55
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Kartana
I'll try to chime in as a Coyotes fan. I agree with everything that you said. The value makes it hard to say no and they need picks, as well as having said they are going into a rebuild/retool. He is also on the verge of not fitting the age range and has a lot of value. But at the same time he is still rather young and signed to a great contract and is by fair Arizona's most reliable center and their depth at the center position is really bad, making it quite difficult to move him, hence why one poster maybe said we would decline. Another reason could be that Arizona's beat writer yesterday said that Dvorak may be our best chance at getting a top 4 RHD and perhaps in this case that could be our preferred target in any trade for him, while our other trade baits will most likely be for picks and futures, as you said. A long answer without a definitive answer, but I think we are in a peculiar place with him.


Yea that all makes sense. Coyotes in general are in a peculiar place so it will be fascinating to see what they do. They have some really good young pieces but they need to keep adding to it through the draft. The loss of draft picks really hurts and I believe they need to recoup some. Like you said though, from Arizona's perspective maybe Dvorak isn't the place to start recouping picks. I do think he is one of Arizonas more desirable players because of his age, cap hit and skill set.
Kartana a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2021 à 12 h 33
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,851
Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
Quoting: MyBaby
That's like... your opinion man...

I can understand not wanting to give up your only RD ready prospect. Could remove him and ruzizka but I would want a small add from CBJ.
I think a late first and a middle 6 forward for a 26 year old top 6C on contract is a steal personally.

This trade doesn't even have to be with Columbus. I just wanted a decent cheap young middle 6 forward and a late first, or something equivalent, to make this roster work. Columbus has picks to spare and desperately needs a top 6 C.


Columbus has picks to spare. Lmfao. Columbus needs all the picks they can get after having arguably the worst prospect pool in the league.

Also Monahan isn’t worth a top 20 pick and Bremstrom to Columbus, with 2 year left on his contract and Columbus likely starting a rebuild. They would be smart to keep what they have as Monahan will be gone by the time they are competitive again.
13 juill. 2021 à 13 h 44
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Ajp_18
Columbus has picks to spare. Lmfao. Columbus needs all the picks they can get after having arguably the worst prospect pool in the league.

Also Monahan isn’t worth a top 20 pick and Bremstrom to Columbus, with 2 year left on his contract and Columbus likely starting a rebuild. They would be smart to keep what they have as Monahan will be gone by the time they are competitive again.


I don't really care if it is CBJ. I was just looking at a team that needs a top 6 C, has picks and a good/cheap/young middle 6 player.
I guess it depends on what Columbus is trying to do. If they are burning it down, then you're right it doesn't make sense.

If that's the direction, does Bjorkstrand become available?
13 juill. 2021 à 13 h 48
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,449
Mentions "j'aime": 2,962
Quoting: MyBaby
I don't really care if it is CBJ. I was just looking at a team that needs a top 6 C, has picks and a good/cheap/young middle 6 player.
I guess it depends on what Columbus is trying to do. If they are burning it down, then you're right it doesn't make sense.

If that's the direction, does Bjorkstrand become available?

There is literally no circumstance on this Earth under which Bjorkstrand becomes available to the Flames.
13 juill. 2021 à 13 h 50
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Modifié 13 juill. 2021 à 14 h 0
Quoting: Viqsi
There is literally no circumstance on this Earth under which Bjorkstrand becomes available to the Flames.


Literally?!11! That's too bad
13 juill. 2021 à 14 h 21
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,851
Mentions "j'aime": 6,441
Quoting: MyBaby
I don't really care if it is CBJ. I was just looking at a team that needs a top 6 C, has picks and a good/cheap/young middle 6 player.
I guess it depends on what Columbus is trying to do. If they are burning it down, then you're right it doesn't make sense.

If that's the direction, does Bjorkstrand become available?


No, Bjorkstrand is almost untouchable at this point. Columbus has a hard time getting players to stay and signing your best player to a long term extension and trading him before he plays a game on said extension is kinda shooing yourself in the foot, yes you get a good return for him, but you also show other players why stay there if they are just going to trade me after signing an extension.
Traptor a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2021 à 14 h 26
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Ajp_18
No, Bjorkstrand is almost untouchable at this point. Columbus has a hard time getting players to stay and signing your best player to a long term extension and trading him before he plays a game on said extension is kinda shooing yourself in the foot, yes you get a good return for him, but you also show other players why stay there if they are just going to trade me after signing an extension.


That's a logical perspective
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage