SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My Tarasenko attempt and Schmidt

Créé par: kscoop
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2021
Publié: 13 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not sure on the value for Tarasenko. Vancouver trying to offload Schmidt so a 2nd plus Wagner should do it. I also think he would be a terrific partner for Mcavoy. Goodrow takes this deal because of the term. could probably get more aav but the 5 years provides him with stability. If Tarasenko is healthy that is a deep group of forwards. Lethal top 2 lines and line 3 can bring it also.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 250 000 $
35 500 000 $
14 000 000 $
52 500 000 $
32 250 000 $
11 575 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
BOS
    Pray Seattle selects Ritchie
    SEA
    1. Ritchie, Nick [Droits de RFA]
    3.
    VAN
    1. Wagner, Chris
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2023
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $75 929 841 $1 956 507 $182 500 $5 570 159 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 575 000 $1 575 000 $
    DD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 40
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,140
    I can't see goodrow signing that contract. This is his one chance to cash in. Someone will offer him a Taney contract.

    Why are you boxing yourself in with some of these contracts? Gotta pay Charlie and pastrnak in back to back years and make a decision on keeping Bergeron or paying up for a top C
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 41
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 6,694
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
    You can get Hakanpaa for half that, he’s really not that good - 6/7 d, closer to 7D on contending team
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 44
    #3
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 33,053
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
    Both Goodrow and Bernier get far more $$
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 50
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 159
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    I can't see goodrow signing that contract. This is his one chance to cash in. Someone will offer him a Taney contract.

    Why are you boxing yourself in with some of these contracts? Gotta pay Charlie and pastrnak in back to back years and make a decision on keeping Bergeron or paying up for a top C


    Tanev signed before Covid. In this flat cap era Goodrow imo would accept this type of deal. Maybe a team offers a Tanev contract but that would be silly. Lots of money for Charlie and Pasta.
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 51
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 159
    Quoting: vikhodush
    You can get Hakanpaa for half that, he’s really not that good - 6/7 d, closer to 7D on contending team


    I wasn't sure on Hakanpaa tbh. If he's not that good I would pass on him. I did not watch him enough tbh.
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 51
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,140
    Quoting: kscoop
    Tanev signed before Covid. In this flat cap era Goodrow imo would accept this type of deal. Maybe a team offers a Tanev contract but that would be silly. Lots of money for Charlie and Pasta.


    You have 27 million to sign 10 players next offseason and in addition to mcavoy, will have to sign Bergeron/krejci or sign replacements and then do it again the following year with pastrnak
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 58
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 19,650
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
    Blues decline

    Why Schmidt? He was never more than average defensively and he declined significantly the last 2 years. Plays much better on right side. Plays softer game than Reilly. Bad contract. Sure i expect him to bounce back, but you can have Reilly for half the cost and get virtually same production.
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 59
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 159
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    You have 27 million to sign 10 players next offseason and in addition to mcavoy, will have to sign Bergeron/krejci or sign replacements and then do it again the following year with pastrnak


    Bergeron taking less and Krejci may walk.
    13 juill. 2021 à 8 h 59
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 159
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Blues decline

    Why Schmidt? He was never more than average defensively and he declined significantly the last 2 years. Plays much better on right side. Plays softer game than Reilly. Bad contract. Sure i expect him to bounce back, but you can have Reilly for half the cost and get virtually same production.


    Schmidt is better than Reilly.
    13 juill. 2021 à 9 h 0
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 19,650
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
    Quoting: kscoop
    Schmidt is better than Reilly.


    Has not been the last 2 years. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    In name, not in value or production.

    They paid a 3rd and he declined in the same manor Debrusk did. And you want to give them a 2nd andwags with no retention?

    3rd ad Moore maybe.
    13 juill. 2021 à 9 h 2
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,140
    Quoting: kscoop
    Bergeron taking less and Krejci may walk.


    But you have to replace him then.

    You've boxed yourself in with bad contracts
    13 juill. 2021 à 9 h 7
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 159
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    But you have to replace him then.

    You've boxed yourself in with bad contracts


    How? Most of Krejci money would go to Mcavoy. Tarasenko walks after the contract which would free up 7.5 Bergeron is on a year to year deal. I get that Krejci would have to be replaced but that is inevitable.
    13 juill. 2021 à 9 h 9
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 159
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Has not been the last 2 years. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    In name, not in value or production.

    They paid a 3rd and he declined in the same manor Debrusk did. And you want to give them a 2nd andwags with no retention?

    Schmidt plays a way more physical game. Did we watch the same Reilly in the playoffs? He pooped himself every time he had to retrieve a puck behind his net.

    3rd ad Moore maybe.
    13 juill. 2021 à 9 h 15
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 19,650
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
    Quoting: kscoop


    He had 15 hits last year. 25 the year before. Has averaged 43 per 82 for his career. Reilly - 70. Reilly plays soft, Schmidt plays softer.
    13 juill. 2021 à 9 h 22
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,140
    Quoting: kscoop
    How? Most of Krejci money would go to Mcavoy. Tarasenko walks after the contract which would free up 7.5 Bergeron is on a year to year deal. I get that Krejci would have to be replaced but that is inevitable.


    Try to make future teams with these moves. It won't go well
    13 juill. 2021 à 9 h 27
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,101
    Mentions "j'aime": 159
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Try to make future teams with these moves. It won't go well


    You mentioned Mcavoy and Pastrnak. Mcavoy already at 4.9 Bruins will sign him 8x8.25 Pastrnak making 6.6 right now. Bruins sign him 8x9

    Lots of money left. And i'd imagine at some point the cap increases.
    13 juill. 2021 à 9 h 43
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,140
    Quoting: kscoop
    You mentioned Mcavoy and Pastrnak. Mcavoy already at 4.9 Bruins will sign him 8x8.25 Pastrnak making 6.6 right now. Bruins sign him 8x9

    Lots of money left. And i'd imagine at some point the cap increases.


    Wildly undervlauing both.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage