SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tarasenko and Hamilton

Créé par: SaskCanesFan
Équipe: 2021-22 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 9 juill. 2021
Publié: 9 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If the Canes want to take the next step to Cup contender, they need to add some more scoring punch and upgrade the bottom 6. These moves leave them with very little cap room and some tough choices to make in 2022-23, but with an improved roster that has the depth and firepower to make a Cup run. Svech and Nedjelkovic get bridge deals, pushing off the long term big $ contracts to when the Cap is hopefully rising. After the season at least one of Nino or Trochek will have to go to make room for Necas' raise, but a prospect like Jarvis or Drury should be able to step in and contribute after another year of development.

Hamilton re-signing is dependent on him liking the fit in Carolina above anywhere else, and the Canes being able to offer an 8th year to spread the money out. If he just wants the highest AAV possible it'll come from somewhere else.

Canes are taking a potential risk on Tarasenko, but for the right price I think its a high upside gamble that's worth the move. Foegele is a solid middle 6 winger right now and a good play driver looking for a bigger role that just doesn't seem to fit the Canes plans. I think Foegele, Suzuki, and a 1st is somwhat of an overpay for Tarasenko right now considering the circumstances around him being moved, so added salary retention and a Scandella for Skjei swap to balance things out and allows the Canes to make some other moves. If the Blues hate the D swap it could be eliminated but I'd probably downgrade either the pick or Suzuki in that scenario.

Nino being pushed down the chart and the addition of Tatar creates a really deep top 9 that should be able to hang with anyone. Bit of a youth movement on the 4th line, I like keeping McGinn around for the veteran presence and PK ability plus he can move up the lineup in a pinch. I like the D better with $5-6M spread out on Scandella and a Miller/Montour type instead of Skjei and a depth guy like Hakanpaa. In this scenario I got enough retention on Miller to make signing Mrazek possible, but if a person wants to save on a cheaper goalie then there's more money to spend on the D instead.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3825 000 $
3825 000 $
3825 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
2950 000 $
36 500 000 $
11 050 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 250 000 $
87 750 000 $
22 250 000 $
23 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
CAR
    Expansion Draft deal to take Gardiner
    SEA
    1. Fast, Jesper
    2. Gardiner, Jake
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
    2.
    CAR
    1. Scandella, Marco
    2. Tarasenko, Vladimir (1 750 000 $ retained)
    STL
    1. Foegele, Warren [Droits de RFA]
    2. Skjei, Brady
    3. Suzuki, Ryan
    4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
    Détails additionnels:
    Foegele is looking for an expanded role and has good underlying numbers, but the Canes need more scoring. Swapped Scandella-Skjei to help the Canes with the cap and the Blues get a bit younger
    3.
    CAR
    1. Miller, Colin (1 875 000 $ retained)
    BUF
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
    Détails additionnels:
    This might be a deal with Seattle instead of Buffalo depending on the expansion draft. 2nd is mainly for the high salary retention.
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de STL
    2022
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CBJ
    2023
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de CAR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $77 548 583 $0 $537 500 $3 951 417 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    725 000 $725 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    3 275 000 $3 275 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    9 juill. 2021 à 19 h 59
    #1
    STL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 3,619
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,637
    I would take this in a heartbeat. SEA would likely have to choose between Dunn and Skjei (they still take Dunn I think). Whoever we’re left with would be our second-pairing LD. Scandella is nice to just be rid of the contract so that leaves Tarasenko for Foegele, Suzuki and a 1st. Way more than I would expect.
    SaskCanesFan et A_K a aimé ceci.
    9 juill. 2021 à 20 h 1
    #2
    Your Mom’s Aho
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 673
    Mentions "j'aime": 69
    i like this a lot
    SaskCanesFan a aimé ceci.
    9 juill. 2021 à 20 h 3
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 52
    Mentions "j'aime": 15
    Quoting: jwg314
    I would take this in a heartbeat. SEA would likely have to choose between Dunn and Skjei (they still take Dunn I think). Whoever we’re left with would be our second-pairing LD. Scandella is nice to just be rid of the contract so that leaves Tarasenko for Foegele, Suzuki and a 1st. Way more than I would expect.


    Cool, good to know! Maybe I'm over rating Scandella if you'd be happy just to be rid of his contract lol. Has his play really fallen off, I thought he'd be decent in that role? Maybe a slight downgrade from Skjei and a bit older, but the cap savings facilitate other moves for the Canes which is the main thing to me.
    9 juill. 2021 à 20 h 9
    #4
    STL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 3,619
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,637
    Quoting: SaskCanesFan
    Cool, good to know! Maybe I'm over rating Scandella if you'd be happy just to be rid of his contract lol. Has his play really fallen off, I thought he'd be decent in that role? Maybe a slight downgrade from Skjei and a bit older, but the cap savings facilitate other moves for the Canes which is the main thing to me.


    He’s not bad but he’s more suitable as a bottom-pairing guy and should be paid as such. Defensive-minded and can play PK.
    SaskCanesFan a aimé ceci.
    9 juill. 2021 à 21 h 42
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 9,212
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,956
    Huge pass on spending that much for tarasenko or paying Seattle that much to take Gardiner and Fast.
    9 juill. 2021 à 22 h 21
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 6,694
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
    I like the concept and really well thought out but I think including Suzuki is unnecessary in the Tara deal. Would imagine the next couple of guys just below Suzuki would still be enough.

    I also don’t mind the idea of moving Skjei but would probably have a couple of other deals to move him for assets and then acquire another second pairing guy via a different trade.
    SaskCanesFan a aimé ceci.
    13 juill. 2021 à 14 h 58
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 52
    Mentions "j'aime": 15
    Quoting: jwg314
    He’s not bad but he’s more suitable as a bottom-pairing guy and should be paid as such. Defensive-minded and can play PK.


    Thanks. Honestly that's not a bad thing, I think that style would fit in well with the Canes other D. Out of curiosity would you think the deal is still acceptable with Dunn in place of Scandella or not?
    13 juill. 2021 à 18 h 51
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 52
    Mentions "j'aime": 15
    Quoting: vikhodush
    I like the concept and really well thought out but I think including Suzuki is unnecessary in the Tara deal. Would imagine the next couple of guys just below Suzuki would still be enough.

    I also don’t mind the idea of moving Skjei but would probably have a couple of other deals to move him for assets and then acquire another second pairing guy via a different trade.


    Thanks for the feedback!

    Yeah I think the trade is probably an overpayment, especially considering the reaction of a Blues fan in the first comment saying he'd take it in a heartbeat. I didn't want to be a Canes homer and throw a lowball offer in though, and this way I think it kinda shows that even in a worst case, overpayment scenario the Canes system is capable of absorbing the loss. But ideally sub in someone like Rees for Suzuki or downgrade the pick to a 2nd.

    As to your couple other trades idea to replace Skjei with a different second pairing guy, I don't disagree, just wonder if you have any specific names in mind? I'm sure there's probably a better combination of trades with other teams out there, I just didn't have anyone specific coming to me and had seen a Scandella/Skjei swap in another one of these mocks and liked the simplicity of it. If someone suggested a series of moves that netted out better in the end I'll gladly run another Armchair GM with those moves instead.
    vikhodush a aimé ceci.
    13 juill. 2021 à 20 h 16
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 6,694
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
    Quoting: SaskCanesFan
    Thanks for the feedback!

    Yeah I think the trade is probably an overpayment, especially considering the reaction of a Blues fan in the first comment saying he'd take it in a heartbeat. I didn't want to be a Canes homer and throw a lowball offer in though, and this way I think it kinda shows that even in a worst case, overpayment scenario the Canes system is capable of absorbing the loss. But ideally sub in someone like Rees for Suzuki or downgrade the pick to a 2nd.

    As to your couple other trades idea to replace Skjei with a different second pairing guy, I don't disagree, just wonder if you have any specific names in mind? I'm sure there's probably a better combination of trades with other teams out there, I just didn't have anyone specific coming to me and had seen a Scandella/Skjei swap in another one of these mocks and liked the simplicity of it. If someone suggested a series of moves that netted out better in the end I'll gladly run another Armchair GM with those moves instead.


    Yeah that’s fair. In terms of trade targets maybe Graves, Gavrikov, Schmidt (would have to be the right offer since it’s a higher cap, maybe retention although they don’t want to do that on his deal or a package that clears Gardiner) or Dunn. UFAs maybe Martinez or I really like oleksiak. Suter if the price is right - think playing with Pesce would be great for him.

    Fleury would’ve been a good option had we kept him honestly.

    It gets complicated bc of expansion draft but I guess if you’re moving Skjei and potentially Bean you could take on a D in a trade that you’d protect.
    SaskCanesFan a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage