Forums/Armchair-GM

Maybe my favorite options so far

Créé par: alwaysnextyear
Date de création initiale: jui 9, 2021
Publié: 9 jui à 14 h 14
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Explications
1) Bridge both Petey and Hughes. They may get a bit more on 3 year deals, but overall the cap number will be lower than if they signed long term. The expiry of both Myers and Johnson's deals line up nicely with these contracts.

2) Cap/expansion trade with Tampa. It's no secret that TBL would love to shed Johnson's contract, and using Cal Foote as the sweetener to do it makes a ton of sense, as he's eligible to be selected in expansion and the Lightning already have several other Dmen to protect. VAN hopes Johnson can be a decent 3C and they get another young D to build around without giving up good future assets.

3) Expansion Protection List;
- Petey, Horvat, Boeser, Miller, Pearson, Lind, Motte
- Schmidt, Foote, Juolevi
- Demko
VAN hopes Seattle selects a larger salary (Myers, Holtby, Johnson, Virtanen), but they take MacEwen instead. Virtanen is bought out.

4) BOS trade; the Bruins are looking for LHD help and were rumored to be interested in OEL. Schmidt is much more affordable and giving up DeBrusk is a cheap acquisition cost. VAN hopes DeBrusk can be a solid top 9 contributor, but if not it's no big loss, as they've saved some money and term in the trade.

5) Re-signed Hamonic, Edler and Sutter to value deals to fill out the roster. If Edler and Sutter want more money or term they can find it elsewhere.


In summary, the team gets a little better, a little younger, and keeps all of their good picks and prospects to continue the rebuild.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Pettersson, Elias36 750 000 $
Hughes, Quinn36 250 000 $
Juolevi, Olli2900 000 $
Lind, Kole2900 000 $
Foote, Cal21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Hamonic, Travis23 000 000 $
Edler, Alexander11 500 000 $
Sutter, Brandon11 000 000 $
Transactions
VAN
  1. Foote, Cal [Droits de RFA]
  2. Johnson, Tyler
TBL
  1. 2021 6e round pick (WPG)
VAN
    SEA
    1. MacEwen, Zack
    VAN
    1. DeBrusk, Jake
    BOS
    1. Schmidt, Nate
    Rachats de contrats
    • Jake Virtanen: 50 000 $
    Frais appliqués
    • Roberto Luongo: 3 035 212 $
    Enfoui
    • Loui Eriksson: 4 875 000 $ (6 000 000 $)
    ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
    2021
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    CHI
    VAN
    VAN
    2022
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    2023
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2481 500 000 $83 450 659 $648 780 $1 900 000 $-1 950 659 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    VAN
    Miller, J.T.
    5 250 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    VAN
    Pettersson, Elias
    6 750 000 $
    C
    RFA
    VAN
    Höglander, Nils
    891 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    VAN
    Pearson, Tanner
    3 250 000 $
    AG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    VAN
    Horvat, Bo
    5 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    VAN
    Boeser, Brock
    5 875 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    BOS
    DeBrusk, Jake
    3 675 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    TBL
    Johnson, Tyler
    5 000 000 $
    AD, C
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    VAN
    Podkolzin, Vasily
    925 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 3
    VAN
    Motte, Tyler
    1 225 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    VAN
    Sutter, Brandon
    1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    VAN
    Lind, Kole
    900 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    VAN
    Hughes, Quinn
    6 250 000 $
    DG
    RFA
    VAN
    Hamonic, Travis
    3 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    VAN
    Demko, Thatcher
    5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 5
    VAN
    Rathbone, Jack
    925 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    VAN
    Myers, Tyler
    6 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    VAN
    Holtby, Braden
    4 300 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    VAN
    Edler, Alexander
    1 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Foote, Cal
    1 000 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    VAN
    Holtby, Braden
    2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    VAN
    Roussel, Antoine
    3 000 000 $
    AG
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    VAN
    Ferland, Micheal
    3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    VAN
    Highmore, Matthew
    725 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    VAN
    Beagle, Jay
    3 000 000 $
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    VAN
    Juolevi, Olli
    900 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    9 jui à 14 h 17
    #1
    Mac1010
    Rejoint: mar 2018
    Messages: 867
    Mentions "j'aime": 277
    seeing how the reports are that they might protect cal foote over McDonagh I dont see them using him as a sweetner.
    Boltsbeathabs a aimé ceci.
    9 jui à 14 h 18
    #2
    Rejoint: jui 2021
    Messages: 1,201
    Mentions "j'aime": 390
    Makes absolutely no sense to leave Foote unprotected. No Chance McDonagh is going to be selected with the term he has left . TB goes 4x4 4NMC's Point Cirelli Sergechev Cernak Foote
    9 jui à 14 h 20
    #3
    Do I look nervous
    Rejoint: jun 2021
    Messages: 3,073
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    To be honest, might as well buyout Holtby and sign a cheaper goalie like Broissoit.
    9 jui à 14 h 20
    #4
    Rejoint: mar 2017
    Messages: 9,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,502
    Yo what's good alwaysnextyear, wanted to see if you had any interest in hoping back into the GM Game?
    9 jui à 14 h 21
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    alwaysnextyear
    Rejoint: jun 2015
    Messages: 3,962
    Mentions "j'aime": 742
    Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
    Makes absolutely no sense to leave Foote unprotected. No Chance McDonagh is going to be selected with the term he has left . TB goes 4x4 4NMC's Point Cirelli Sergechev Cernak Foote


    Kind of surprising, they'd lose Palat to Seattle for nothing then. I know they want to shed salary, but I assumed they'd want to keep Palat if they could.
    9 jui à 14 h 24
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    alwaysnextyear
    Rejoint: jun 2015
    Messages: 3,962
    Mentions "j'aime": 742
    Quoting: phillyjabroni
    Yo what's good alwaysnextyear, wanted to see if you had any interest in hoping back into the GM Game?


    No thanks man, I'm going to keep my presence here casual for now. Good luck!
    phillyjabroni a aimé ceci.
    9 jui à 14 h 24
    #7
    Rejoint: jun 2016
    Messages: 10,661
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,723
    Bruins decline. Schmidt isn't a $5.95M player.
    pastrnak_is_my_dad a aimé ceci.
    9 jui à 14 h 25
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    alwaysnextyear
    Rejoint: jun 2015
    Messages: 3,962
    Mentions "j'aime": 742
    Quoting: Juiceman
    To be honest, might as well buyout Holtby and sign a cheaper goalie like Broissoit.


    I know Holtby wasn't great last year, but I think he could be just as good as Brossoit this year as a backup. I'm not a fan of the buyout cap penalties unless it's a no-brainer financially like Virtanen's.
    9 jui à 14 h 27
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    alwaysnextyear
    Rejoint: jun 2015
    Messages: 3,962
    Mentions "j'aime": 742
    Quoting: bhavikp27
    Bruins decline. Schmidt isn't a $5.95M player.


    And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.
    9 jui à 14 h 30
    #10
    Rejoint: jun 2021
    Messages: 786
    Mentions "j'aime": 110
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.


    they aren't exactly interested in OEL they are interested in taking on OELs contract to get Garland. Big difference there. Also I'd rather let JD bounce back after covid and personal stuff ruined his season than ship him off to Vancouver for a ok D man making 6 mil.
    9 jui à 14 h 33
    #11
    Rejoint: avr 2021
    Messages: 5,819
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,025
    Can’t see this being an option for boston.
    9 jui à 14 h 33
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    alwaysnextyear
    Rejoint: jun 2015
    Messages: 3,962
    Mentions "j'aime": 742
    Quoting: pastrnak_is_my_dad
    they aren't exactly interested in OEL they are interested in taking on OELs contract to get Garland. Big difference there. Also I'd rather let JD bounce back after covid and personal stuff ruined his season than ship him off to Vancouver for a ok D man making 6 mil.


    Is that the rumor? That's an awefully huge contract to take on just to get Garland!
    9 jui à 14 h 33
    #13
    Rejoint: avr 2021
    Messages: 5,819
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,025
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.

    According to who? I haven’t seen a single thing indicating the bruins are interested.
    9 jui à 14 h 34
    #14
    Rejoint: avr 2021
    Messages: 5,819
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,025
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    Is that the rumor? That's an awefully huge contract to take on just to get Garland!

    There aren’t any rumors.
    9 jui à 14 h 35
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    alwaysnextyear
    Rejoint: jun 2015
    Messages: 3,962
    Mentions "j'aime": 742
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    According to who? I haven’t seen a single thing indicating the bruins are interested.


    I don't remember whether it was one of the TSN or Sportsnet "insiders".
    9 jui à 14 h 36
    #16
    Rejoint: avr 2021
    Messages: 5,819
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,025
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    I don't remember whether it was one of the TSN or Sportsnet "insiders".


    I don’t think there has been anything credible ever. Just maybe some bloggers. Every time a player is reported to be available they generate something saying he’s headed to whatever team they cover, and get clicks. Bloggers stink.
    9 jui à 14 h 38
    #17
    Do I look nervous
    Rejoint: jun 2021
    Messages: 3,073
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,621
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    I know Holtby wasn't great last year, but I think he could be just as good as Brossoit this year as a backup. I'm not a fan of the buyout cap penalties unless it's a no-brainer financially like Virtanen's.


    Well, Holtbys buyout is 500,000 which is a lot better than keeping his 4.3 mil with below 900 save percentage. :/
    9 jui à 14 h 40
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    alwaysnextyear
    Rejoint: jun 2015
    Messages: 3,962
    Mentions "j'aime": 742
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    I don’t think there has been anything credible ever. Just maybe some bloggers. Every time a player is reported to be available they generate something saying he’s headed to whatever team they cover, and get clicks. Bloggers stink.


    Agreed about bloggers, but this was talked about by somewhat credible people at least. Whether it's actually true is a different story.
    9 jui à 14 h 46
    #19
    Rejoint: avr 2021
    Messages: 5,819
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,025
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    Agreed about bloggers, but this was talked about by somewhat credible people at least. Whether it's actually true is a different story.


    That’s the thing, i don’t think it was talked about by credible people, other than last year when OEL said he would only waive for boston and vancouver. Then nothing happened, probably because boston doesn’t have any interest in OEL.
    9 jui à 14 h 46
    #20
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 4,324
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,637
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    Kind of surprising, they'd lose Palat to Seattle for nothing then. I know they want to shed salary, but I assumed they'd want to keep Palat if they could.


    Palat is easily replaced and helps with the cap. Killorn moves up. Ross Colton, Joseph and Barre-Boulet make the 4th line. Keeping Gourde would be a problem. He was great in the post season. Shut down line with Goodrow and Coleman...
    9 jui à 14 h 47
    #21
    Rejoint: jun 2016
    Messages: 10,661
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,723
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.


    Point is if you want to trade for him, you'll need to retain, just like ARI with OEL. Bruins can reject the trade and you keep Schmidt. VAN isn't the one who has the leverage.
    9 jui à 14 h 51
    #22
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 8,648
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,327
    Quoting: alwaysnextyear
    And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.


    They kicked tires on OEL last year but once ARZ said it wasn't willing to retain they walked away.
    alwaysnextyear a aimé ceci.
    9 jui à 17 h 20
    #23
    Rejoint: fév 2017
    Messages: 91
    Mentions "j'aime": 15
    Quoting: mm1010
    seeing how the reports are that they might protect cal foote over McDonagh I dont see them using him as a sweetner.


    Vasi made of been the playoff MVP, but McDonagh was the MVP of the Finals. If they aren't protecting him, I can't see them losing him for nothing. And I think Francis would take him in a heartbeat.
    9 jui à 17 h 34
    #24
    Mac1010
    Rejoint: mar 2018
    Messages: 867
    Mentions "j'aime": 277
    Quoting: gordfish
    Vasi made of been the playoff MVP, but McDonagh was the MVP of the Finals. If they aren't protecting him, I can't see them losing him for nothing. And I think Francis would take him in a heartbeat.


    they would or they trade him just reports i have heard.

    That means CAl foote is out of this deal though
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Supprimer une option
    Soumettre le sondage