SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Maybe my favorite options so far

Créé par: alwaysnextyear
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 9 juill. 2021
Publié: 9 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
1) Bridge both Petey and Hughes. They may get a bit more on 3 year deals, but overall the cap number will be lower than if they signed long term. The expiry of both Myers and Johnson's deals line up nicely with these contracts.

2) Cap/expansion trade with Tampa. It's no secret that TBL would love to shed Johnson's contract, and using Cal Foote as the sweetener to do it makes a ton of sense, as he's eligible to be selected in expansion and the Lightning already have several other Dmen to protect. VAN hopes Johnson can be a decent 3C and they get another young D to build around without giving up good future assets.

3) Expansion Protection List;
- Petey, Horvat, Boeser, Miller, Pearson, Lind, Motte
- Schmidt, Foote, Juolevi
- Demko
VAN hopes Seattle selects a larger salary (Myers, Holtby, Johnson, Virtanen), but they take MacEwen instead. Virtanen is bought out.

4) BOS trade; the Bruins are looking for LHD help and were rumored to be interested in OEL. Schmidt is much more affordable and giving up DeBrusk is a cheap acquisition cost. VAN hopes DeBrusk can be a solid top 9 contributor, but if not it's no big loss, as they've saved some money and term in the trade.

5) Re-signed Hamonic, Edler and Sutter to value deals to fill out the roster. If Edler and Sutter want more money or term they can find it elsewhere.


In summary, the team gets a little better, a little younger, and keeps all of their good picks and prospects to continue the rebuild.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
36 750 000 $
36 250 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Foote, Cal [Droits de RFA]
  2. Johnson, Tyler
TBL
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
2.
3.
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 775 659 $648 780 $1 900 000 $3 724 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 17
#1
Mac1010
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,679
Mentions "j'aime": 718
seeing how the reports are that they might protect cal foote over McDonagh I dont see them using him as a sweetner.
Boltsbeathabs a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 18
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,596
Mentions "j'aime": 2,486
Makes absolutely no sense to leave Foote unprotected. No Chance McDonagh is going to be selected with the term he has left . TB goes 4x4 4NMC's Point Cirelli Sergechev Cernak Foote
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 20
#3
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
To be honest, might as well buyout Holtby and sign a cheaper goalie like Broissoit.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,392
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
Yo what's good alwaysnextyear, wanted to see if you had any interest in hoping back into the GM Game?
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 21
#5
Démarrer sujet
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,521
Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Makes absolutely no sense to leave Foote unprotected. No Chance McDonagh is going to be selected with the term he has left . TB goes 4x4 4NMC's Point Cirelli Sergechev Cernak Foote


Kind of surprising, they'd lose Palat to Seattle for nothing then. I know they want to shed salary, but I assumed they'd want to keep Palat if they could.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 24
#6
Démarrer sujet
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,521
Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
Quoting: phillyjabroni
Yo what's good alwaysnextyear, wanted to see if you had any interest in hoping back into the GM Game?


No thanks man, I'm going to keep my presence here casual for now. Good luck!
phillyjabroni a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 24
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,573
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Bruins decline. Schmidt isn't a $5.95M player.
pastrnak_is_my_dad a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 25
#8
Démarrer sujet
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,521
Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
Quoting: Juiceman
To be honest, might as well buyout Holtby and sign a cheaper goalie like Broissoit.


I know Holtby wasn't great last year, but I think he could be just as good as Brossoit this year as a backup. I'm not a fan of the buyout cap penalties unless it's a no-brainer financially like Virtanen's.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 27
#9
Démarrer sujet
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,521
Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
Quoting: bhavikp27
Bruins decline. Schmidt isn't a $5.95M player.


And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 30
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 798
Mentions "j'aime": 113
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.


they aren't exactly interested in OEL they are interested in taking on OELs contract to get Garland. Big difference there. Also I'd rather let JD bounce back after covid and personal stuff ruined his season than ship him off to Vancouver for a ok D man making 6 mil.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 33
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Can’t see this being an option for boston.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 33
#12
Démarrer sujet
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,521
Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
Quoting: pastrnak_is_my_dad
they aren't exactly interested in OEL they are interested in taking on OELs contract to get Garland. Big difference there. Also I'd rather let JD bounce back after covid and personal stuff ruined his season than ship him off to Vancouver for a ok D man making 6 mil.


Is that the rumor? That's an awefully huge contract to take on just to get Garland!
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 33
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.

According to who? I haven’t seen a single thing indicating the bruins are interested.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 34
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Is that the rumor? That's an awefully huge contract to take on just to get Garland!

There aren’t any rumors.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 35
#15
Démarrer sujet
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,521
Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
According to who? I haven’t seen a single thing indicating the bruins are interested.


I don't remember whether it was one of the TSN or Sportsnet "insiders".
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 36
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
I don't remember whether it was one of the TSN or Sportsnet "insiders".


I don’t think there has been anything credible ever. Just maybe some bloggers. Every time a player is reported to be available they generate something saying he’s headed to whatever team they cover, and get clicks. Bloggers stink.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 38
#17
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
I know Holtby wasn't great last year, but I think he could be just as good as Brossoit this year as a backup. I'm not a fan of the buyout cap penalties unless it's a no-brainer financially like Virtanen's.


Well, Holtbys buyout is 500,000 which is a lot better than keeping his 4.3 mil with below 900 save percentage. :/
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 40
#18
Démarrer sujet
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,521
Mentions "j'aime": 1,566
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
I don’t think there has been anything credible ever. Just maybe some bloggers. Every time a player is reported to be available they generate something saying he’s headed to whatever team they cover, and get clicks. Bloggers stink.


Agreed about bloggers, but this was talked about by somewhat credible people at least. Whether it's actually true is a different story.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 46
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Agreed about bloggers, but this was talked about by somewhat credible people at least. Whether it's actually true is a different story.


That’s the thing, i don’t think it was talked about by credible people, other than last year when OEL said he would only waive for boston and vancouver. Then nothing happened, probably because boston doesn’t have any interest in OEL.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 46
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 5,062
Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
Kind of surprising, they'd lose Palat to Seattle for nothing then. I know they want to shed salary, but I assumed they'd want to keep Palat if they could.


Palat is easily replaced and helps with the cap. Killorn moves up. Ross Colton, Joseph and Barre-Boulet make the 4th line. Keeping Gourde would be a problem. He was great in the post season. Shut down line with Goodrow and Coleman...
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 47
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,573
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.


Point is if you want to trade for him, you'll need to retain, just like ARI with OEL. Bruins can reject the trade and you keep Schmidt. VAN isn't the one who has the leverage.
9 juill. 2021 à 14 h 51
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
And OEL isn't an $8.25M player, but apparently they're interested in him. And the acquisition cost would likely be higher for OEL. Just throwing out a cheaper option.


They kicked tires on OEL last year but once ARZ said it wasn't willing to retain they walked away.
alwaysnextyear a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2021 à 17 h 20
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 441
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: mm1010
seeing how the reports are that they might protect cal foote over McDonagh I dont see them using him as a sweetner.


Vasi made of been the playoff MVP, but McDonagh was the MVP of the Finals. If they aren't protecting him, I can't see them losing him for nothing. And I think Francis would take him in a heartbeat.
9 juill. 2021 à 17 h 34
#24
Mac1010
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,679
Mentions "j'aime": 718
Quoting: gordfish
Vasi made of been the playoff MVP, but McDonagh was the MVP of the Finals. If they aren't protecting him, I can't see them losing him for nothing. And I think Francis would take him in a heartbeat.


they would or they trade him just reports i have heard.

That means CAl foote is out of this deal though
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage