SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade up

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 7 juill. 2021
Publié: 7 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
7th OA

San Jose does not have a 2nd or really very many assets for a rebuilding team. They move back 5 spots targeting one of the goalies who they might just take at 7 anyways and pick up more draft capital.
SJS
  1. Kalynuk, Wyatt
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
11th OA+61 OA

Hawks move up targeting Simon Edvinson
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $56 176 843 $452 439 $4 265 000 $25 323 157 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 juill. 2021 à 20 h 25
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,840
Mentions "j'aime": 5,808
I guess I would do it.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2021 à 20 h 29
#2
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,633
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
This makes some sense if it’s the right player.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2021 à 20 h 29
#3
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,633
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
This makes some sense if it’s the right player.
7 juill. 2021 à 20 h 29
#4
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,633
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
This makes some sense if it’s the right player.
7 juill. 2021 à 20 h 30
#5
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,633
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
This makes some sense if it’s the right player.
7 juill. 2021 à 20 h 34
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
I don’t hate it. Eklund and Guenther, Hughes also would need to be gone though.
7 juill. 2021 à 20 h 51
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,280
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
Quoting: papishark
I don’t hate it. Eklund and Guenther, Hughes also would need to be gone though.


Hypothetically, Powers, Beniers, Hughes, Eklund, Guenther, Clarke are the first 6, I think both teams do it. Anything can happen but those 6 are the best 6 in the draft imo. I really like Edvinson though. Think he's exatcly what the hawks need and a perfect partner for Boqvist on the future top pair
7 juill. 2021 à 21 h 7
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Wadejos123
Hypothetically, Powers, Beniers, Hughes, Eklund, Guenther, Clarke are the first 6, I think both teams do it. Anything can happen but those 6 are the best 6 in the draft imo. I really like Edvinson though. Think he's exatcly what the hawks need and a perfect partner for Boqvist on the future top pair


I think id much rather move back than take Edvinsson but thats the beauty of the draft!
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2021 à 21 h 45
#9
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
I'd replace Kalynuk with Mitchell or another prospect because that's a big price to pay to move up 4 spots, Kalynuk had 9 points in 21 games and is better defensively than Boqvist, Beaudin, and Mitchell
7 juill. 2021 à 21 h 50
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,280
Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
Quoting: Beetlejuice
I'd replace Kalynuk with Mitchell or another prospect because that's a big price to pay to move up 4 spots, Kalynuk had 9 points in 21 games and is better defensively than Boqvist, Beaudin, and Mitchell


In terms of value Boqvist, Mitchell, and Beaudan all are more valuable than Kalynuk. He had a good 20 games but i'm not all in on him being better than any of those 4, let alone all 4 like you are suggesting. I watched every game and though Beaudan was just as good as him when he played. Mitchell was good at the start then hit the rookie slump. I've seen flashes of op pair potential in Boqvist but he just needs to put it all together at once and stay healthy
7 juill. 2021 à 21 h 56
#11
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Quoting: Wadejos123
In terms of value Boqvist, Mitchell, and Beaudan all are more valuable than Kalynuk. He had a good 20 games but i'm not all in on him being better than any of those 4, let alone all 4 like you are suggesting. I watched every game and though Beaudan was just as good as him when he played. Mitchell was good at the start then hit the rookie slump. I've seen flashes of op pair potential in Boqvist but he just needs to put it all together at once and stay healthy


I didn't say he's better than Boqvist, I said he's better defensively, but I don't think Chicago shouldn't trade Kalynuk since he looked really good, I think there are better options to trade Barratt, Regula, or Entwistle,
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2021 à 23 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 979
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: Beetlejuice
I didn't say he's better than Boqvist, I said he's better defensively, but I don't think Chicago shouldn't trade Kalynuk since he looked really good, I think there are better options to trade Barratt, Regula, or Entwistle,


that's a decent trade back proposal. I'd rather have a prospect who's on the same timeline as Wiesblatt, Bordeleau, Robins, etc. like Teply, Kaiser, or Vlasic
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2021 à 8 h 45
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 421
Mentions "j'aime": 225
Quoting: papishark
I think id much rather move back than take Edvinsson but thats the beauty of the draft!


Just worry that Wallstedt is gone by the time that Ottawa picks which makes the whole thing null and void. For a team that hasn't drafted this high since 2003, you have to assure yourselves that you get an impactful prospect that you really like.

The cost to move down from 7 to 11 would cost more than this package. To move from 20 to 18 in 2013, DW gave up 20th overall and 58th overall. That was just to move up 2 spots much later in the 1st round. By most thought processes and more modern draft pick value charts, it would probably take another late 2nd or early 3rd rounder to make up the difference from 7 to 11 (and likely even more given this draft seems to have a very set top 10 and a bigger than normal fall off of uncertainty after that).
papishark a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage