I agree with you completely, however, if a team comes along offering a young RHD for nylander, leafs may entertain the thought

I believe they have a lot of other assets they could use first.

Would Manson + get ANA Nylander? Or we have Vatanen, but I've heard he's too similar to what you have.

Hate to break it to you kid (gunshot) ...anyone can get traded at anytime for anyone. So quit the whining in every Nylander trade.

Highly doubt Manson becomes more a 1st pairing defender. Seems like a high floor / low ceiling player.
As a result no, Nylander doesn't get traded for a 2nd pairing defender.

I have interest in Manson to the leafs but not at the expense of Nylander.

Theres no deal that makes sense involving him

The only type of player that the leafs would want for Nylander if an Ekblad/Parayako type no? The leafs arn't desperate for defence, they arnt going to undersell him for d help

Also thanks for being a condescending douchebag lmao, you must be a really great guy!

Leafs arn't being forced to make a deal so they arnt going to overpay, actually Anaheim would be the ones knocking since there the ones who are gonna be forced to trade a guy unless they wanna lose a dman for free

That's fair. Neither Vatanen or Manson has top pairing potential IMO (Ducks fan). In fact, I think Manson is heavily overrated because of his superb advanced stats. He's good, but he's a fringe top 4 if you ask me.

Nylander is definitely worth a lot more. Any interest in Theodore or Montour?



I never said they would be "forced" to do anything.

Yes, ANA obviously has to move someone, but we're not up against it by any means. Lots of teams looking for young, signed, RHD-men. I suspect Vatanen is moved to TB for Palat with a small + or to NYR for Miller.