SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Hes Available

Créé par: Terry_AkiSauce
Équipe: 2021-22 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 6 juill. 2021
Publié: 6 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
26 500 000 $
55 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
44 500 000 $
21 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Beckman, Adam
  2. Greenway, Jordan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
2.
MIN
SEA
  1. Parise, Zach
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $75 186 667 $0 $132 500 $6 313 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juill. 2021 à 4 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Cant imagine he would be, and that package isnt enough to convince them otherwise
6 juill. 2021 à 4 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Both teams decline
6 juill. 2021 à 4 h 29
#3
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Cant imagine he would be, and that package isnt enough to convince them otherwise


In this scenario they trade for Eichel and decide to keep Strome as their 2C. Won't be able to afford Zib next year so they move on, Minny may need to pay more but he'd just be a rental
6 juill. 2021 à 4 h 32
#4
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Both teams decline


I think Zib would be such a good fit on Minny
6 juill. 2021 à 4 h 36
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
I think Zib would be such a good fit on Minny


Yeah but youre going to a team that wants to compete but is starved for centers and saying give me your 1 legit center for wingers which you have so damn many of. It really doesnt make sense at all. In terms of seattle why would they take 4 years of ~7.5 million of dead cap which is pretty much buyout proof for a late 1st in a crapshoot of a draft.
6 juill. 2021 à 5 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Yeah but youre going to a team that wants to compete but is starved for centers and saying give me your 1 legit center for wingers which you have so damn many of. It really doesnt make sense at all. In terms of seattle why would they take 4 years of ~7.5 million of dead cap which is pretty much buyout proof for a late 1st in a crapshoot of a draft.


Like I said above, this would be if Eichel gets traded to NYR and they wouldn't have the cap space to re-sign Zib beyond this year. You can definitely argue the return but the Wild have enough assets to make a move work.

If Minnesota goes 4/4 and Parise waives, the best available player would be Hartman or Rask
6 juill. 2021 à 5 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Like I said above, this would be if Eichel gets traded to NYR and they wouldn't have the cap space to re-sign Zib beyond this year. You can definitely argue the return but the Wild have enough assets to make a move work.

If Minnesota goes 4/4 and Parise waives, the best available player would be Hartman or Rask


Foligno
6 juill. 2021 à 5 h 41
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Like I said above, this would be if Eichel gets traded to NYR and they wouldn't have the cap space to re-sign Zib beyond this year. You can definitely argue the return but the Wild have enough assets to make a move work.

If Minnesota goes 4/4 and Parise waives, the best available player would be Hartman or Rask


Soucy, talbot/kahkonen
6 juill. 2021 à 5 h 46
#9
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Foligno


Quoting: Islesforthecup
Soucy, talbot/kahkonen


Soucy I guess... Kahkonen is exempt and Foligno would be protected
6 juill. 2021 à 5 h 48
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Soucy I guess... Kahkonen is exempt and Foligno would be protected


If foligno is protected theres foligno, zuc, fiala, greenway, and ek thats too many. Also are you sure kahkonen is exempt, i see everywhere 1 of the goalies exposed (talbot or kaapo)?
6 juill. 2021 à 6 h 38
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,260
Mentions "j'aime": 672
Makes zero sense for the Rangers. They don’t go after Eichel if they don’t think they could retain both as top 2 centers. There are others places they can cut salary if it comes to it long before Mika goes on the block
NYR1983 a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 6 h 40
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,212
Mentions "j'aime": 2,511
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
In this scenario they trade for Eichel and decide to keep Strome as their 2C. Won't be able to afford Zib next year so they move on, Minny may need to pay more but he'd just be a rental


If we got JE we would still keep Zibby and move a winger when needed. Also if needed because to get JE we would likely be giving up assets. Regardless I can’t see us ever moving him or him wanting out.
6 juill. 2021 à 7 h 5
#13
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Islesforthecup
If foligno is protected theres foligno, zuc, fiala, greenway, and ek thats too many. Also are you sure kahkonen is exempt, i see everywhere 1 of the goalies exposed (talbot or kaapo)?


In the expansion draft tool, Fiala doesn't meet exposure reqs and I based it off that. But you are right about Kahkonen, I didn't think he met requirements but he does so you're right that him or Talbot would be more valuable
6 juill. 2021 à 7 h 7
#14
Démarrer sujet
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: NYR1983
If we got JE we would still keep Zibby and move a winger when needed. Also if needed because to get JE we would likely be giving up assets. Regardless I can’t see us ever moving him or him wanting out.


Quoting: aspina25
Makes zero sense for the Rangers. They don’t go after Eichel if they don’t think they could retain both as top 2 centers. There are others places they can cut salary if it comes to it long before Mika goes on the block


That's why the post is called "If he's available". Don't know why you both act like it's impossible for him to be moved if they acquire Eichel since he'll likely want a big payday and could literally walk at the end of the year even if they have the money. I can agree the return might be more but it's a possibility he gets moved
6 juill. 2021 à 7 h 25
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,260
Mentions "j'aime": 672
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
That's why the post is called "If he's available". Don't know why you both act like it's impossible for him to be moved if they acquire Eichel since he'll likely want a big payday and could literally walk at the end of the year even if they have the money. I can agree the return might be more but it's a possibility he gets moved


But it’s really not a possibility that he’s moved. A team doesn’t go “all in” so they can finally have 1A and 1B centers just to trade one of them before they play on the team at the same time.
6 juill. 2021 à 9 h 7
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,212
Mentions "j'aime": 2,511
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
That's why the post is called "If he's available". Don't know why you both act like it's impossible for him to be moved if they acquire Eichel since he'll likely want a big payday and could literally walk at the end of the year even if they have the money. I can agree the return might be more but it's a possibility he gets moved


I’m not sure why you’re overreacting here. I’m simply telling you we would be keeping the better C’s for multiple reasons. Owner wants to compete for a cup and that’s what they would do by acquiring JE. In that event Strome might be available. Also we would just find a way to keep both so we had a strong C lineup. It’s not impossible, but it does make 0 sense with the direction we are going. Maybe that’s why our responses seem like they are shooting your idea out of the sky 🤷🏻‍♂️
6 juill. 2021 à 9 h 15
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
It makes sense. Rangers can't afford both Mika and Eichel so Mika likely has to go.

The package isn't really enough though. Rangers have a lot of winger depth and need C's. Someone like Khusnutdinov would be a definite inclusion. I think if you add him you're pretty close. The 1st/Beckman/Greenway would all likely go to Buffalo in an Eichel deal anyway.
6 juill. 2021 à 13 h 21
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
In the expansion draft tool, Fiala doesn't meet exposure reqs and I based it off that. But you are right about Kahkonen, I didn't think he met requirements but he does so you're right that him or Talbot would be more valuable


Yes theres 2 things
1. Any player who played a certain amount of professional games is eligible to be picked.
2. Every team must expose 2 forwards and 1 defenseman who are under contract for 21-22 who played a certain amount of nhl games.
Fiala might not qualify for number 2 but he certainly does for number 1.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage