SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

reset

Créé par: klaw2
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2021
Publié: 5 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 300 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
1750 000 $
2950 000 $
22 000 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
11 700 000 $
12 200 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Chytil, Filip [Droits de RFA]
  2. Schneider, Braden
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
2.
SJS
SEA
  1. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
3.
SJS
  1. Malgin, Denis [Droits de RFA]
TOR
  1. Donato, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
4.
SJS
  1. Sissons, Colby [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
5.
SJS
  1. Strome, Dylan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de CHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de NJD
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $60 005 363 $0 $557 500 $21 494 637 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juill. 2021 à 12 h 46
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
These are all terrible but thanks.
5 juill. 2021 à 12 h 53
#2
Démarrer sujet
Dubas intern
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 856
Mentions "j'aime": 116
Quoting: papishark
These are all terrible but thanks.


I dont see the problem with any of these trades. The Sharks get for Hertl a 3rd line C who is still only 22 and is established in the NHL already, 2 picks, and a pretty good defensive prospect for a rental in Hertl. I see it being similar to the Pacioretty trade from a few years ago. Obviously its not a perfect comparison but thats my logic in this trade. For the Labanc trade, its basically a wash, as they get someone who can play 3C and is younger and has more upside, and its sort of a change of scenery swap, with Chicago giving up a 2nd to balance it out, as I would say Labanc is more established at this point. The Simek trade is a cap dump, Malgin/Donato swap is 2 guys who may not get Qualified, and I can see Malgin doing well in SJ, as he played well under Boughner in Florida and is a similar player to Barabanov.
5 juill. 2021 à 12 h 57
#3
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,684
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
The general agreement is that Schneider should be replaced with Jones, and the 2nd should be made this years 1st.

Definite nope on trading Donato for Malgin. Malgin is worth nothing more than a 6th.

Better for Sharks to hang on to Simek in that scenario.

Labanc one I could consider.
5 juill. 2021 à 12 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 31
I know some Rangers fans like trading Chytil for Hertl but the Rangers aren't going to trade their only cost controlled center for another guy who is a UFA next year. Last thing the team needs is all three of their top 9 centers to hit UFA at the same time.
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 16
#5
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Quoting: Klara
The general agreement is that Schneider should be replaced with Jones, and the 2nd should be made this years 1st.

Definite nope on trading Donato for Malgin. Malgin is worth nothing more than a 6th.

Better for Sharks to hang on to Simek in that scenario.

Labanc one I could consider.


Not sure what general consensus u think ur getting Jones chytil and a 1st for him. Chytil and a 1st is what is the “general” consensus
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 18
#6
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: WuWuWuKennyWu
I know some Rangers fans like trading Chytil for Hertl but the Rangers aren't going to trade their only cost controlled center for another guy who is a UFA next year. Last thing the team needs is all three of their top 9 centers to hit UFA at the same time.


Its not ideal, but if we trade for Hertl, Strome is almost certainly gone one way or another. Also, its likely that Buchnevich will get traded as his extension wont fit in.
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 19
#7
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: Nikolay_Zherdev
Not sure what general consensus u think ur getting Jones chytil and a 1st for him. Chytil and a 1st is what is the “general” consensus


Honestly, if Jones is the make or break part of the trade, Ill throw Jones in.
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 20
#8
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,684
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
Quoting: Nikolay_Zherdev
Not sure what general consensus u think ur getting Jones chytil and a 1st for him. Chytil and a 1st is what is the “general” consensus


that's just what I've seen the most, obviously Chytil and the 1st are the framework.
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 21
#9
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Quoting: aecliptic
Honestly, if Jones is the make or break part of the trade, Ill throw Jones in.


I have no issue trading Jones this offseason but I won’t just throw him into a trade for a 2C that won’t be costing that much.
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 22
#10
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
Quoting: Klara
that's just what I've seen the most, obviously Chytil and the 1st are the framework.


That’s fine but Jones is worth close to a 1st (maybe 2 2nd) and will progress into being worth more.
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 23
#11
Démarrer sujet
Dubas intern
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 856
Mentions "j'aime": 116
Quoting: Klara
The general agreement is that Schneider should be replaced with Jones, and the 2nd should be made this years 1st.

Definite nope on trading Donato for Malgin. Malgin is worth nothing more than a 6th.

Better for Sharks to hang on to Simek in that scenario.

Labanc one I could consider.


I dont know if Donato is being qualified anyways and their value is probably around the same. Also the Malgin Boughner connection is why I think this makes sense.
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 30
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Honestly wouldn't trade Chytil for Hertl straight up given the cost/value difference.

So yeah that makes it a pretty easy decline.
5 juill. 2021 à 13 h 42
#13
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Quoting: Nikolay_Zherdev
I have no issue trading Jones this offseason but I won’t just throw him into a trade for a 2C that won’t be costing that much.


I highly doubt Jones is in the long term plans of the Rangers. I wouldnt let him be the rate limiting step in a trade for a bonafide 2C.
5 juill. 2021 à 19 h 39
#14
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: klaw2
I dont see the problem with any of these trades. The Sharks get for Hertl a 3rd line C who is still only 22 and is established in the NHL already, 2 picks, and a pretty good defensive prospect for a rental in Hertl. I see it being similar to the Pacioretty trade from a few years ago. Obviously its not a perfect comparison but thats my logic in this trade. For the Labanc trade, its basically a wash, as they get someone who can play 3C and is younger and has more upside, and its sort of a change of scenery swap, with Chicago giving up a 2nd to balance it out, as I would say Labanc is more established at this point. The Simek trade is a cap dump, Malgin/Donato swap is 2 guys who may not get Qualified, and I can see Malgin doing well in SJ, as he played well under Boughner in Florida and is a similar player to Barabanov.


The Sharks didn't get a first or a high second so the prospect pool continues to middle. Hertl without a first is laughable, think Hall to Arizona or Duchene to Columbus as comparables.
6 juill. 2021 à 11 h 8
#15
Démarrer sujet
Dubas intern
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 856
Mentions "j'aime": 116
Quoting: jfrojelin
The Sharks didn't get a first or a high second so the prospect pool continues to middle. Hertl without a first is laughable, think Hall to Arizona or Duchene to Columbus as comparables.


Or think Pacioretty as a comparison, as Schnieder was just a first round pick last year, played in both the Worlds and World Juniors and has upside. I dont see it being a given the Sharks get a first.
7 juill. 2021 à 15 h 26
#16
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,325
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: klaw2
Or think Pacioretty as a comparison, as Schnieder was just a first round pick last year, played in both the Worlds and World Juniors and has upside. I dont see it being a given the Sharks get a first.


Suzuki was a former first round pick in that trade... thats basically a first
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage